The fate of augments to treat-type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 195-199

  Patel, J V ^a,b   Masonis, J L ^a   Guerin, J ^a   Bourne, R B ^a   Rorabeck, C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION;

EID: 1642276052     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.13564     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bertin KC, Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Ratcliffe SS, Todd RC. Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1985;67-B:242-8.
2. Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE, Sobel M. The results of revisional total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988;226:86-92.
3. Elia EA, Lotke PA. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty associated with significant bone loss. Clin Orthop 1991;271:114-21.
4. Friedman RJ, Hirst P, Poss R, Kelley K, Sledge CB. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty performed for aseptic loosening. Clin Orthop 1990;255:235-41.
5. Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994;309:116-23.
6. Hartford JM, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Knoblick G. Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: An average 5-year follow-up. Arthroplasty 1998;13:380-7.
7. Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W 3rd, Windsor RE. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:1700-7.
8. Takahashi Y, Gustilo RB. Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994;309:156-62.
9. Bugbee WD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. Does implant selection affect outcome of revision knee arthroplasty? J Arthoplasty 2001;16:581-5.
10. Chen F, Krackow KA. Management of tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty: A bio-mechanical study. Clin Orthop 1994;305:249-57.
11. Fehring TK, Peindl RD, Humble RS, Harrow ME, Frick SL. Modular tibial augmentations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996;327:207-17.
12. Brooks PJ, Walker PS, Scott RD. Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop 1984;184:302-8.
13. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA. Tibial wedge augmentation for bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty: A follow-up study. Clin Orthop 1995;321:151-5.
14. Rand JA. Bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty: Use of metal wedge augmentation. Clin Orthop 1991;271:63-71.
15. Jeffery RS, Orton MA, Denham RA. Wedged tibial components for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:381-7.
16. Brand MG, Daley RJ, Ewald FC, Scott RD. Tibial tray augmentation with modular metal wedges for tibial bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop 1989;248:71-9.
17. Engh GA. Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH, eds. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1997:63-120.
18. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:9-12.
19. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-4.
20. Kaplan EJ, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1959;53:457-81.
21. Harada Y, Wevers HW, Cooke TD. Distribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia. J Arthroplasty 1988;3:167-75.
22. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999;367:165-71.
23. Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB, Surprenant HP. Corrosion between the components of modular femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:511-7.
24. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO. Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses: Particule microanalysis and histopathological findings. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76-A:1345-59.
25. Rand JA. Modular augments in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:347-53.
26. Lim LA, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD. Failure of the stem-condyle junction of a modular femoral stem in revision total knee arthroplasty: A report of five cases. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:128-32.
27. Rand JA. Augmentation of a total knee arthroplasty with a modular metal wedge: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995;77-A:266-8.
28. Bourne RB, Finlay JR. The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1986;208:95-9.
29. Albrektsson BEJ, Ryd L, Carlsson LV et al. The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990;72-B:252-8.
30. Rand JA, Sculco TP, Miric A, Klein JDS, MacCauley W. The use of prosthetic augments is the optimal way to correct for bone defects during total knee replacement. In: Laskin RS, ed. Controversies in total knee replacement. Oxford University Press, 2001:41-71.