Estimation of effective population size in continuously distributed populations: There goes the neighborhood

Heredity

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 189-199

  Neel, M C ^a   McKelvey, K ^b   Ryman, N ^c   Lloyd, M W ^a   Short Bull, R ^d   Allendorf, F W ^d   Schwartz, M K ^b   Waples, R S ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^e NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

genetic monitoring; inbreeding; isolation by distance; linkage disequilibrium; wahlund effect; wright neighborhood

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INBREEDING; MONITORING; NEIGHBORHOOD; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84882448979     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.37     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson EC (2005). An efficient Monte Carlo method for estimating Ne from temporally spaced samples using a coalescent-based likelihood. Genetics 170: 955-967.
2. Antao T, Perez-Figueroa A, Luikart G (2011). Early detection of population declines: high power of genetic monitoring using effective population size estimators. Evol Appl 4: 144-154.
3. Balloux F (2004). Heterozygote excess in small populations and the heterozygote-excess effective population size. Evolution 58: 1891-1900.
4. Barton NH, Wilson I (1995). Genealogies and geography. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 349: 49-59.
5. Bazinet AL, Myers DS, Fuetsch J, Cummings MP (2007). Grid services base library: a high-level, procedural application program interface for writing Globus-based grid services. Future Gener Comp Syst 23: 517-522.
6. Boessenkool S, Star B, Seddon PJ, Waters JM (2010). Temporal genetic samples indicate small effective population size of the endangered yellow-eyed penguin. Conserv Genet 11: 539-546.
7. Bradbury IR, Bentzen P (2007). Non-linear genetic isolation by distance: implications for dispersal estimation in anadromous and marine fish populations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 340: 245-257.
8. Charlesworth B (2009). Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat Rev Genet 10: 195-205.
9. Crow JF, Denniston C (1988). Inbreeding and variance effective population numbers. Evolution 42: 482-495.
10. England PR, Luikart G, Waples RS (2010). Early detection of population fragmentation using linkage disequilibrium estimation of effective population size. Conserv Genet 11: 2425-2430.
11. Felsenstein J (1975). Pain in the torus - some difficulties with models of isolation by distance. Am Nat 109: 359-368.
12. Franckowiak RP, Sloss BL, Bozek MA, Newman SP (2009). Temporal effective size estimates of a managed walleye Sander vitreus population and implications for geneticbased management. J Fish Biol 74: 1086-1103.
13. Frantz AC, Cellina S, Krier A, Schley L, Burke T (2009). Using spatial Bayesian methods to determine the genetic structure of a continuously distributed population: clusters or isolation by distance? J Appl Ecol 46: 493-505.
14. Guillot G, Leblois R, Coulon A, Frantz AC (2009). Statistical methods in spatial genetics. Mol Ecol 18: 4734-4756.
15. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (1999). Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models. Heredity 83: 145-154.
16. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002). SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 618-620.
17. Hauser L, Carvalho GR (2008). Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts. Fish Fisheries 9: 333-362.
18. Hedgecock D (1994). Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population size of marine organisms? In: Beaumont AR (ed). Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms. Chapman and Hall: London, pp 122-135.
19. Hedrick PW (2005). A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59: 1633-1638.
20. Hill WG (1981). Estimation of effective population size from data on linked genes. Adv Appl Probability 13: 4-4.
21. Kawata M (1995). Effective population size in a continuously distributed population. Evolution 49: 1046-1054.
22. Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Murphy M, Luikart G (2010). Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19: 4179-4191.
23. Leblois R, Estoup A, Streiff R (2006). Genetics of recent habitat contraction and reduction in population size: does isolation by distance matter? Mol Ecol 15: 3601-3615.
24. Leblois R, Rousset F, Estoup A (2004). Influence of spatial and temporal heterogeneities on the estimation of demographic parameters in a continuous population using individual microsatellite data. Genetics 166: 1081-1092.
25. Luikart G, Ryman N, Tallmon DA, Schwartz MK, Allendorf FW (2010). Estimation of census and effective population sizes: the increasing usefulness of DNA-based approaches. Conserv Genet 11: 355-373.
26. Malécot G (1975). Heterozygosity and relationship in regularly subdivided populations. Theor Popul Biol 8: 212-241.
27. Maruyama T (1972). Rate of decrease of genetic variability in a 2-dimensional continuous population of finite size. Genetics 70: 639-651.
28. Meirmans PG, Hedrick PW (2011). Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 5-18.
29. Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH (2004). GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 792-794.
30. Meirmans PG (2012). The problem with isolation by distance. Mol Ecol 21: 2839-2846.
31. Nei M, Li WH (1973). Linkage disequilibrium in subdivided populations. Genetics 75: 213-219.
32. Nei M, Tajima F (1981). Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. Genetics 98: 625-640.
33. Nikolic N, Butler JRA, Bagliniere JL, Laughton R, McMyn IAG, Chevalet C (2009). An examination of genetic diversity and effective population size in Atlantic salmon populations. Genet Res 91: 395-412.
34. Novembre J, Stephens M (2008). Interpreting principal component analyses of spatial population genetic variation. Nat Genet 40: 646-649.
35. Okello JBA, Wittemyer G, Rasmussen HB, Arctander P, Nyakaana S, Douglas-Hamilton I et al. (2008). Effective population size dynamics reveal impacts of historic climatic events and recent anthropogenic pressure in African elephants. Mol Ecol 17: 3788-3799.
36. Palstra FP, Fraser DJ (2012). Effective/census population size ratio estimation: a compendium and appraisal. Ecol Evol 2: 2357-2365.
37. Palstra FP, O'Connell MF, Ruzzante DE (2009). Age structure, changing demography and effective population size in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Genetics 182: 1233-1249.
38. Pudovkin AI, Zaykin DV, Hedgecock D (1996). On the potential for estimating the effective number of breeders from heterozygote-excess in progeny. Genetics 144: 383-387.
39. Purcell JFH, Cowen RK, Hughes CR, Williams DA (2006). Weak genetic structure indicates strong dispersal limits: a tale of two coral reef fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273: 1483-1490.
40. Purcell JFH, Cowen RK, Hughes CR, Williams DA (2009). Population structure in a common Caribbean coral-reef fish: implications for larval dispersal and early life-history traits. J Fish Biol 74: 403-417.
41. Robertson A (1965). The interpretation of genotypic ratios in domestic animal populations. Anim Prod 7: 319-324.
42. Rohlf FJ, Schnell GD (1971). An investigation of the isolation-by- distance model. Am Nat 105: 295-324.
43. Rousset F, Leblois R (2012). Likelihood-based inferences under isolation by distance: twodimensional habitats and confidence intervals. Mol Biol Evol 29: 957-973.
44. Rousset F (1997). Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145: 1219-1228.
45. Rousset F (2000). Genetic differentiation between individuals. J Evol Biol 13: 58-62.
46. Rousset F (2008). GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106.
47. Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS (2009). Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conserv Genet 10: 441-452.
48. Schwartz MK, Mills LS, Ortega Y, Ruggiero LF, Allendorf FW (2003). Landscape location affects genetic variation of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis). Mol Ecol 12: 1807-1816.
49. Schwartz MK, Tallmon DA, Luikart G (1998). Review of DNA-based census and effective population size estimators. Anim Conserv 1: 293-299.
50. Sinnock P (1975). Wahlund effect for the two-locus model. Am Nat 109: 565-570.
51. Tallmon DA, Draheim HM, Mills LS, Allendorf FW (2002). Insights into recently fragmented vole populations from combined genetic and demographic data. Mol Ecol 11: 699-709.
52. Tallmon DA, Gregovich D, Waples RS, Baker CS, Jackson J, Taylor BL et al. (2010). When are genetic methods useful for estimating contemporary abundance and detecting population trends? Mol Ecol Resour 10: 684-692.
53. Tallmon DA, Koyuk A, Luikart G, Beaumont MA (2008). ONeSAMP: a program to estimate effective population size using approximate Bayesian computation. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 299-301.
54. Wang JL (2005). Estimation of effective population sizes from data on genetic markers. Phil Trans R Soc 360: 1395-1409.
55. Wang JL (2009). A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes. Mol Ecol 18: 2148-2164.
56. Waples RS, Do C (2008). LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 753-756.
57. Waples RS, Do C (2010). Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary Ne using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evol Appl 3: 244-262.
58. Waples RS, England PR (2011). Estimating contemporary effective population size on the basis of linkage disequilibrium in the face of migration. Genetics 189: 633-644.
59. Waples RS, Yokota M (2007). Temporal estimates of effective population size in species with overlapping generations. Genetics 175: 219-233.
60. Waples RS (2005). Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? Mol Ecol 14: 3335-3352.
61. Watts PC, Rousset F, Saccheri IJ, Leblois R, Kemp SJ, Thompson DJ (2007). Compatible genetic and ecological estimates of dispersal rates in insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata: Zygoptera) populations: analysis of 'neighbourhood size' using a more precise estimator. Mol Ecol 16: 737-751.
62. Weir BS (1996). Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer: Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
63. Wilkins JF (2004). A separation-of-timescales approach to the coalescent in a continuous population. Genetics 168: 2227-2244.
64. Wright S (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
65. Wright S (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 23: 114-138.
66. Wright S (1946). Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31: 39-59.
67. Zhdanova OL, Pudovkin AL (2008). The program NB-HETEXCESS to estimate small Nb from genotype frequencies in the progeny. J Hered 99: 694-695.