Activation of learning strategies in writing learning journals the specificity of prompts matters;Aktivierung von lernstrategien beim schreiben von lerntagebüchern: Wie spezifisch müssen prompts sein?

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 95-104

  Glogger, Inga ^a   Holzäpfel, Lars ^a   Schwonke, Rolf ^a   Nückles, Matthias ^a   Renkl, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Learning strategies; Prompts; Writing learning journals

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651114005     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.95     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
2. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective meta-cognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147-179.
3. Artelt, C. (2000). Wie prädiktiv sind retrospektive Selbstberichte über den Gebrauch von Lernstrategien für strategisches Lernen? [How predictive are self-reported strategies for their actual use?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 14, 72-84.
4. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
5. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29-58.
6. Bannert, M. (2007). Metakognition beim Lernen mit Hypermedia. Erfassung, Beschreibung und Vermittlung wirksamer metakognitiver Lernstrategien und Regulationsaktivitäten [Metacognition in learning with hypermedia. Assessment, description and mediation of effective metacognitive learning strategies and regulation activities]. Münster: Waxmann.
7. Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (1996). Lernstrategien und schulische Leistungen [Learning strategies and school performance]. In J. Möller & O. Köller (Eds.), Emotionen, Kognitionen und Schulleistung [Emotions, cognitions, and school performance] (pp. 137-154). Weinheim: Beltz.
8. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes. The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564-577.
10. Borasi, R., & Rose, B. J. (1989). Journal writing and mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 347-365.
11. Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2002). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation for social scientists]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
13. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.
15. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Erlbaum.
16. Connolly, P., & Vilardi, T. (Eds.). (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91-142.
18. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83-87.
19. Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Structural/process theories of complex human behavior (pp. 213-245). The Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
20. Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R., & Chinsky, J. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal memory tasks as a function of age. Child Development, 37, 283-289.
21. Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted κ and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 613-619.
22. Gallin, P., & Ruf, U. (1998). Sprache und Mathematik in der Schule [Language and mathematics in school]. Seelze: Kallmeyer.
23. Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2009). Writing learning journals: Instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instructions, doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.12.001.
24. Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychological Review, 19, 509-539
25. King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note-taking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 303-323.
26. Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with Cognitive Tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239-264.
27. Langer, I., & Schulz von Thun, F. (1974). Messung komplexer Merkmale in Psychologie und Pädagogik - Ratingverfahren [Measuring complex attributes in psychology and pedagogy - rating procedures]. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.
28. Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2002). Der Einsatz von Lernstrategien in einer konkreten Lernsituation bei Schülern unterschiedlicher Jahrgangsstufen [The use of learning strategies in a specific learning situation in students of different grades]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45. Beiheft, 240-258.
29. Leutner, D., & Leopold, C. (2006). Selbstregulation beim Lernen aus Sachtexten [Self-regulation during learning from expository texts]. In H. Mandl & F. Friedrich (Eds.), Handbuch Lernstrategien [Handbook learning strategies] (pp. 145-154). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
30. McCrindle, A., & Christensen, C. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performances. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167-185.
31. Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). The pitfalls of overprompting in writing-to-learn. In R. Sun, N. Miyake, & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2575). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
32. Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259-271.
33. Nückles, M., Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2004). The use of public learning diaries in blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 49-66.
34. Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91-109.
35. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1-29.
36. Renkl, A. (1999). Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 477-488.
37. Schiefele, U., Streblow, L., Ermgassen, U., & Moschner, B. (2003). Lernmotivation und Lernstrategien als Bedingungen der Studienleistung: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittstudie [The influence of learning motivation and learning strategies on college achievement: Results of a longitudinal analysis]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 185-198.
38. Staub, F. C. (2006). Notizenmachen: Funktionen, Formen und Werkzeugcharakter von Notizen [Note-taking: Functions, forms and the tool-character of notes]. In H. Mandl & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Handbuch Lernstrategien [Handbook learning strategies] (pp. 59-71). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
39. Schwonke, R., Hauser, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2006). Enhancing computer-supported writing of learning protocols by adaptive prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 77-92.
40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
41. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In C. M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
42. Wild, K.-P., & Schiefele, U. (1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens [Learning strategies in studying: Results of factor structure and reliability of a new questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 185-200.
43. Wong, R. M. F., Lawson, M. J., & Keeves, J. (2002). The effects of self-explanation training on students' problem solving in highschool mathematics. Learning and Instruction, 12, 233-262.