Structure-based prediction of domain-peptide binding affinity by dissecting residue interaction profile at complex interface: A case study on CAL PDZ domain

Protein and Peptide Letters

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1018-1028

  Jin, Rongzhong ^a   Ma, Yili ^a   Qin, Lifeng ^a   Ni, Zhong ^b  

^a GUILIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b JIANGSU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics analysis; Domain peptide binding; Machine learning; Residue pair interaction

Indexed keywords

CAL PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVALENT BOND; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PDZ DOMAIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOM FOREST; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84882336075     PISSN: 09298665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/0929866511320090008     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Reimand, J.; Hui, S.; Jain, S.; Law, B.; Bader, G.D. Domainmediated protein interaction prediction: from genome to network. FEBS Lett., 2012, 586, 2751-2763.
2. Petsalaki, E.; Stark, A.; Garcia-Urdiales, E.; Russell, R.B. Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2009, 5, e1000335.
3. Kuriyan, J.; Cowburn, D. Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 1997, 26, 259-288.
4. Petsalaki, E.; Russell, R.B. Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 2008, 19, 344-350.
5. Vanhee, P.; Stricher, F.; Baeten, L.; Verschueren, E.; Lenaerts, T.; Serrano, L.; Rousseau, F.; Schymkowitz, J. Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds. Structure, 2009, 17, 1128-1136.
6. Hou, T.; Zhang, W.; Case, D.A.; Wang, W. Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. J. Mol. Biol., 2008, 376, 1201-1214.
7. Santonico, E.; Castagnoli, L.; Cesareni, G. Methods to reveal domain networks. Drug Discov. Today, 2005, 10, 1111-1117.
8. Reineke, U.; Volkmer-Engert, R.; Schneider-Mergener, J. Applications of peptide arrays prepared by the SPOT.-Technology. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 2001, 12, 59-64.
9. Landgraf, C.; Panni, S.; Montecchi-Palazzi, L.; Castagnoli, L.; Schneider-Mergener, J.; Volkmer-Engert, R.; Cesareni, G. Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol., 2004, 2, e14.
10. Hou, T.; McLaughlin, W.; Lu, B.; Chen, K.; Wang, W. Prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using homology modeling, molecular dynamics and molecular field analysis. J. Proteome Res., 2006, 5, 32-43.
11. Ren, Y.; Tian, F.; Zhou, P. Computational peptidology. Prog. Chem., 2012, 9, 1674-1682.
12. Tian, F.; Lv, F.; Zhou, P. ; Yang, Q.; Jalbout, A.F. Toward prediction of binding affinities between the MHC protein and its peptide ligands using quantitative structure-Affinity relationship approach. Protein Pept. Lett., 2008, 15, 1033-1043.
13. Zhou, P.; Tian, F.; Chen, X.; Shang, Z. Modeling and prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using genetic algorithm-Gaussian processes. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.), 2008, 90, 792-802.
14. Tian, F.; Yang, L.; Lv, F.; Luo, X.; Pan, Y. Why OppA protein can bind sequence-independent peptides? A combination of QM/MM, PB/SA, and structure-based QSAR analyses. Amino Acids, 2011, 40, 493-503.
15. Zhou, P.; Zeng, H.; Tian, F.; Li B.; Li, Z. Applying novel molecular electronegativity-interaction vector (MEIV) to QSPR study on collision cross section of singly protonated peptides. QSAR Comb. Sci., 2007, 26, 117-121.
16. Zhou, P.; Chen, X.; Shang, Z. Side-chain conformational space analysis (SCSA): a multi conformation-based QSAR approach for modeling and prediction of protein-peptide binding affinities. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 2009, 23, 129-141.
17. Ren, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, P. Gaussian process: a promising approach for the modeling and prediction of peptide binding affinity to MHC proteins. Protein Pept. Lett., 2011, 18, 670-678.
18. Zhou, P.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Shang, Z. Gaussian process: an alternative approach for QSAM modeling of peptides. Amino Acids, 2010, 38, 199-212.
19. Lee, M.J.; de Jong, S.; Gäde, G.; Poulos, C.; Goldsworthy, G.J. Mathematical modelling of insect neuropeptide potencies. Are quantitatively predictive models possible? Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 2000, 30, 899-907.
20. Zhou, P.; Tian, F.; Wu, Y.; Li, Z.; Shang, Z. Quantitative sequenceactivity model (QSAM): applying QSAR strategy to model and predict bioactivity and function of peptides, proteins and nucleic acids. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des., 2008, 4, 311-321.
21. Wang, T.; Wade, R.C. Comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis of OppA.-peptide complexes to relate structure to binding thermodynamics. J. Med. Chem., 2002, 45, 4828-4837.
22. Hou, T.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, W.; McLaughlin, W.A.; Case, D.A.; Xu, Y.; Wang, W. Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2009, 8, 639-649.
23. He, P.; Wu, W.; Wang, H.D.; Yang, K.; Liao, K.L.; Zhang, W. Toward quantitative characterization of the binding profile between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands. Amino Acids, 2010, 38, 1209-1218.
24. Hellberg, S.; Sjöström, M.; Skagerberg, B.; Wold, S. Peptide quantitative structure-Activity relationships, a multivariate approach. J. Med. Chem., 1987, 30, 1126-1135.
25. Doytchinova, I.A.; Blythe, M.J.; Flower, D.R. Additive method for the prediction of protein-peptide binding affinity. Application to the MHC class I molecule HLA.-A. 0201. J. Proteome Res., 2002, 1, 263-272.
26. Lee, H.J.; Zheng, J.J. RDZ domains and their binding partners: structure, specificity, and modification. Cell Commun. Signal., 2010, 8, 8.
27. Dev, K.K. Making protein interactions druggable: targeting PDZ domains. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2004, 3, 1047-1056.
28. Cushing, P.R.; Vouilleme, L.; Pellegrini, M.; Boisguerin, P.; Madden, D.R. A stabilizing inuence: CAL PDZ inhibition extends the half-life of dF508-CFTR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2010, 49, 9907-9911.
29. Aasland, R.; Abrams, C.; Ampe, C.; Ball, L.J.; Bedford, M.T.; Cesareni, G.; Gimona, M.; Hurley, J.H.; Jarchau, T.; Lehto, V.P.; Lemmon, M.A.; Linding, R.; Mayer, B.J.; Nagai, M.; Sudol. M.; Walter, U.; Winder, S.J. rmalization of nomenclature for peptide motifs as ligands of modular protein domains. FEBS Lett., 2002, 513, 141-144.
30. Roberts, K.E.; Cushing, P.R.; Boisguerin, P.; Madden, D.R.; Donald, B.R. Computational design of a PDZ domain peptide inhibitor that rescues CFTR activity. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2012, 8, e1002477.
31. Vouilleme, L.; Cushing, P.R.; Volkmer, R.; Madden, D.R.; Boisguerin, P. Engineering Peptide inhibitors to overcome PDZ binding promiscuity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2010, 122, 10108-10112.
32. Wu, G.; Zhang, Z.L.; Fu, C.J.; Lv, F.L.; Tian, F.F. Proteome-wide inference of human endophilin 1-binding peptides. Protein Pept. Lett., 2012, 19, 1094-1102.
33. Piserchio, A.; Fellows, A.; Madden, D.R.; Mierke, D.F. Association of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator with CAL: structural features and molecular dynamics. Biochemistry, 2005, 44, 16158-16166.
34. Saro, D.; Li, T.; Rupasinghe, C.; Paredes, A.; Caspers, N.; Spaller, M.R. A thermodynamic ligand binding study of the third PDZ domain (PDZ3) from the mammalian neuronal protein PSD.-95. Biochemistry, 2007, 46, 6340-6352.
35. Chen, J.R.; Chang, B.H.; Allen, J.E.; Stiffler, M.A.; MacBeath, G. Predicting PDZ domain-peptide interactions from primary sequences. Nat. Biotechnol., 2008, 26, 1041-1045.
36. Tian, F.; Lv, Y.; Zhou, P. ; Yang, L. Characterization of PDZ domain-peptide interactions using an integrated protocol of QM/MM, PB/SA, and CFEA analyses. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 2011, 25, 947-958.
37. Wang, Q.; Canutescu, A.A.; Dunbrack Jr, R.L. SCWRL and Mol-IDE: computer programs for side-chain conformation prediction and homology modeling. Nat. Protoc., 2008, 3, 1832-1847.
38. Vriend, G. WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph., 1990, 8, 52-56.
39. Ponder, J.W.; Richards, F.M. An efficient newton-like method for molecular mechanics energy minimization of large molecules. J. Comput. Chem., 1987, 8, 1016-1024.
40. Qiu, D.; Shenkin, P.S.; Hollinger, F.P.; Still, W.C. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation. A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate Born radII. J. Phys. Chem., 1997, 101(16), 3005-3014.
41. Jorgensen, W.L.; Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS force field for proteins. Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 1657-1666.
42. Chowdry, A.B.; Reynolds, K.A.; Hanes, M.S.; Voorhies, M.; Pokala, N.; Handel, T.M. An object-oriented library for computational protein design. J. Comput. Chem., 2007, 28, 2378-2388.
43. Jorgensen, W.L.; Maxwell, D.S.; Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-Atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 11225-11236.
44. Kaminski, G., Jorgensen, W.L. Performance of the AMBER94, MMFF94, and OPLS.-AA force fields for modeling organic liquids. J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 18010-18013.
45. Boulesteix, A.L.; Strimmer, K. Partial least squares: a versatile tool for the analysis of high-dimensional genomic data. Brief. Bioinform., 2007, 8, 32-44.
46. Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45, 5-32.
47. Tian, F.; Yang, L.; Lv, F.; Zhou, P. Predicting liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides from the Drosophila melanogaster proteome by machine learning approaches. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2009, 644, 10-16.
48. ChemoAC Calibration Toolbox. Virtual Institute of Chemometrics and Industrial Metrology. Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
49. randomForest. Breiman and Cutler's random forests for classification and regression. UC Berkeley, CA, 2012.
50. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Beware of q 2? J. Mol. Graph. Model., 2002, 20, 269-276.
51. Tropsha, A.; Gramatica, P.; Gombar, V.K. The Importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb. Sci., 2003, 22, 69-77.
52. Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y.D.; Lee, K.H.; Tropsha, A. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 2003, 17, 241-253.
53. Stuart M. Rothstein, William D. Bell, Jayne A. Patrick and Harry Miller. A jackknife test of homogeneity of variance with paired replicates data. Psychometrika, 1981, 46, 35-40.
54. Kandaswamy, K.K.; Chou, K.C.; Martinetz, T.; Moller, S.; Suganthan, P.N.; Sridharan, S.; Pugalenthi, G. AFP.-Pred: a random forest approach for predicting antifreeze proteins from sequence-derived properties. J. Theor. Biol., 2011, 270, 56-62.
55. Ren, Y.; Chen, S.; Zou, X.; Tian, F.; Zhou, P. Use of Gaussian process to model and predict domain-peptide recognition and interaction. Sci. China Chem., 2012, 42, 1179-1189.
56. Tian, F.; Yang, L.; Lv, F.; Luo, X.; Pan, Y. Why OppA protein can bind sequence-independent peptides? A combination of QM/MM, PB/SA, and structure-based QSAR Analyses. Amino Acids, 2011, 40, 493-503.
57. Fu, C.; Wu, G.; Lv, F.; Tian, F. Structure-based characterization of the binding of peptide to the human endophilin-1 Src homology 3 domain using position-dependent noncovalent potential analysis. J. Mol. Model., 2012, 18, 2153-2161.
58. Yuan, Z.; Bailey, T.L.; Teasdale, R.D. Prediction of protein Bfactor profiles. Proteins, 2005, 58, 905-912.
59. Zhou, P.; Tian, F.; Lv, F.; Shang, Z. Comprehensive comparison of eight statistical modelling methods used in quantitative structureretention relationship studies for liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides generated by protease digestion of the Escherichia coli proteome. J. Chromatogr. A, 2009, 1216, 3107-3116.
60. Siggers, T.W.; Silkov, A.; Honig, B. Structural alignment of protein-DNA interfaces: insights into the determinants of binding specificity. J. Mol. Biol., 2005, 345, 1027-1045.
61. Harris, B.Z.; Lim, W.A. Mechanism and role of PDZ domains in signaling complex assembly. J. Cell Sci., 2001, 114, 3219-3231.
62. Nourry, C.; Grant, S.G.; Borg, J.P. PDZ domain proteins: plug and play? Sci. STKE, 2003, 2003, RE7.
63. London, N.; Movshovitz-Attias, D.; Schueler-Furman, O. The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. Structure, 2010, 18, 188-199.