Structure-based characterization of the binding of peptide to the human endophilin-1 Src homology 3 domain using position-dependent noncovalent potential analysis

Journal of Molecular Modeling

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 2153-2161

  Fu, Chunjiang ^a   Wu, Gang ^a   Lv, Fenglin ^b   Tian, Feifei ^b  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Noncovalent interaction; Peptide2; Src homology 3 domain; Statistical modeling

Indexed keywords

ENDOPHILIN; PROTEIN SH3;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MUTAGENESIS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATIC ELECTRICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ACYLTRANSFERASES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; THERMODYNAMICS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84861232310     PISSN: 16102940     EISSN: 09485023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-011-1197-y     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Neduva V, Linding R, Su Angrand I, Stark A, de Masi F, Gibson TJ, Lewis J, Serrano L, Russell RB (2005) Systematic discovery of new recognition peptides mediating protein interaction networks. PLoS Biol 3:e405
2. Petsalaki E, Russell RB (2008) Peptide mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:344-350
3. Vanhee P, Stricher F, Baeten L, Verschueren E, Lenaerts T, Serrano L, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J (2009) Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds. Structure 17:1128-1136
4. Hou T, Chen K, McLaughlin WA, Lu B, Wang W (2006) Computational analysis and prediction of the binding motif and protein interacting partners of the Abl SH3 domain. PLoS Comput Biol 2:e1
5. Sparks AB, Rider JE, Hoffman NG, Fowlkes DM, Quillam LA, Kay BK (1996) Distinct ligand preferences of Src homology 3 domains from Src, Yes, Abl, Cortactin, p53bp2, PLCgamma, Crk, and Grb2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:1540-1544 (Pubitemid 26075160)
6. Lim WA, Richards FM, Fox RO (1997) Structural determinants of peptide-binding orientation and of sequence specificity in SH3 domains. Nature 372:375-379
7. Rickles RJ, Botfield MC, Zhou XM, Henry PA, Brugge JS, Zoller MJ (1995) Phage display selection of ligand residues important for Src homology 3 domain binding specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:10909-10913
8. Tong AH, Drees B, Nardelli G, Bader GD, Brannetti B (2002) A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295:321-324 (Pubitemid 34074361)
9. Frank R (1992) Spot-synthesis: an easy technique for the positionally addressable, parallel chemical synthesis on a membrane support. Tetrahedron 48:9217-9232
10. Reineke U, Volkmer-Engert R, Schneider-Mergener J (2001) Applications of peptide arrays prepared by the SPOT-technology. Curr Opin Biotech 12:59-64 (Pubitemid 32843145)
11. Reiss DJ, Schwikowski B (2004) Predicting protein-peptide interactions via a network-based motif sampler. Bioinformatics 20(suppl 1):i274-i282 (Pubitemid 41296699)
12. Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bockler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, Lassmann T, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer ELL, Bateman A (2006) Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D247-D251
13. Ferraro E, Via A, Ausiello G, Helmer-Citterich M (2005) A neural strategy for the inference of SH3 domain-peptide interaction specificity. BMC Bioinformatics 6(Suppl 4):S13
14. Hou T, Zhang W, Case DA, Wang W (2008) Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. J Mol Biol 376:1201-1214
15. Ivanciuc O (2009) Machine learning quantitative structure- activity relationships (QSAR) for peptides binding to the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. Curr Proteomics 6:289-302
16. Hou T, McLaughlin W, Lu B, Chen K, Wang W (2006) Prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using homology modeling, molecular dynamics and molecular field analysis. J Proteome Res 5:32-43 (Pubitemid 43100795)
17. Hou T, Xu Z, Zhang W, McLaughlin WA, Case DA, Xu Y, Wang W (2009) Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:639-649
18. Zhou P, Tian F, Chen X, Shang Z (2008) Modeling and prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using genetic algorithm-Gaussian processes. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 90:792-802
19. He P, Wu W, Yang K, Jing T, Liao K, Zhang W, Wang H, Hua X (2011) Exploring the activity space of peptides binding to diverse SH3 domains using principal property descriptors derived from amino acid rotamers. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 96:288-301
20. Reutens AT, Begley CG (2002) Endophilin-1: a multifunctional protein. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34:1173-1177 (Pubitemid 34804352)
21. Zhou P, Tian F, Wu Y, Li Z, Shang Z (2008) Quantitative sequence-activity model (QSAM): applying QSAR strategy to model and predict bioactivity and function of peptides, proteins and nucleic acids. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 4:311-321
22. Landgraf C, Panni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Castagnoli L, Schneider-Mergener J, Volkmer-Engert R, Cesareni G (2004) Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol 2:94-103
23. Cestra G, Castagnoli L, Dente L, Minenkova O, Petrelli A (1999) The SH3 domains of endophilin and amphiphysin bind to the proline-rich region of synaptojanin 1 at distinct sites that display an unconventional binding specificity. J Biol Chem 274:32001-32007
24. Lim WA, Richards FM, Fox RO (1994) Structural determinants of peptidebinding orientation and of sequence specificity in SH3 domains. Nature 372:375-379 (Pubitemid 24363441)
25. Ryckaert J, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23:327-341
26. Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM (2005) The AMBER biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26:1668-1688 (Pubitemid 43076180)
27. Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL Jr (2009) Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 77:778-795
28. Word JM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (1999) Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol 285:1735-1747
29. Knapp B, Omasits U, Schreiner W (2008) Side chain substitution benchmark for peptide/MHC interaction. Protein Sci 17:977-982 (Pubitemid 351749203)
30. Zhou P, Tian F, Lv F, Shang Z (2009) Geometric characteristics of hydrogen bonds involving sulfur atoms in proteins. Proteins 76:151-163
31. Hu L, Ai Z, Liu P, Xiong Q, Min M, Lan C, Wang J, Fan L, Chen D (2010) Predicting the binding affinity of epitope peptides with HLA-A*0201 by encoding atom-pair non-covalent interaction information between receptor and ligands. Chem Biol Drug Des 75:597-606
32. He P, Wu W, Wang H, Yang K, Liao K, Zhang W (2010) Toward quantitative characterization of the binding profile between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain and its peptide ligands. Amino Acids 38:1209-1218
33. Zhou P, Tian F, Li Z (2007) A structure-based, quantitative structureactivity relationship approach for predicting H.L.A.A. 0201-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes. Chem Biol Drug Des 69:56-67 (Pubitemid 46277786)
34. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD (1986) Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 319:199-203 (Pubitemid 16128783)
35. Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Spehner JC (1996) Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 38:305-320
36. Tian F, Zhang C, Fan X, Yang X, Wang X, Liang H (2010) Predicting the flexibility profile of ribosomal RNAs. Mol Inf 29:707-715
37. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L (2001) PLS regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 58:109-130 (Pubitemid 33033283)
38. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273-293
39. Zhou P, Tian F, Lv F, Shang Z (2009) Comprehensive comparison of eight statistical modelling methods used in quantitative structure-retention relationship studies for liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides generated by protease digestion of the Escherichia coli proteome. J Chromatogr A 1216:3107-3116
40. Hellberg S, Sjostrom M, Skagerberg B, Wold S (1987) Peptide quantitative structure-activity relationships, a multivariate approach. J Med Chem 30:1126-1135 (Pubitemid 17117970)
41. Tian F, Yang L, Lv F, Yang Q, Zhou P (2009) In silico quantitative prediction of peptides binding affinity to human MHC molecule: an intuitive quantitative structure-activity relationship approach. Amino Acids 36:535-554
42. Tian F, Lv F, Zhou P, Yang Q, Jalbout AF (2008) Toward prediction of binding affinities between the MHC protein and its peptide ligands using quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach. Protein Pept Lett 15:1033-1043
43. Liang G, Chen G, Niu W, Li Z (2008) Factor analysis scales of generalized amino acid information as applied in predicting interactions between the human amphiphysin-1 SH3 domains and their peptide ligands. Chem Biol Drug Des 71:345-351 (Pubitemid 351347792)