Open innovation activities to foster corporate en trepreneurshi p

Entrepreneurship and Technological Change

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 287-247

  Mortara, Letizia ^a   Napp, Johann ^a   Ford, Simon ^a   Minshall, Tim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882027689     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781002018.00024     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Ahuja, G. and C. M. Lampert (2001). 'Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established fimts create breakthrough inventions'. Slrategic Mallagemelll JOt/mal. 22 (6-7), 521-543.
2. Alvarez, S. A. and J. B. Barney (2001). 'How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from aJ1ifinc- with large partners'. Academy oj Management Execuli\'e, 15 (l), 139-148.
3. Ansoff. H.I. (1968), 'The innovative finn'. Lollg Rallge Plallllillg, 1 (2),26-27.
4. Antonic, B. (2001). 'Organizational processes in inlrapreneurshlp: A conceptual integraLioṅ. Journal oj Emerprisi"8 Culfure,9 (2), 221-235.
5. Auber. R. P. (1965), 'Outside ideas -dynamite', Research MOllogemem. 8 (3).183-190.
6. AudrelSch. O. B. (2002). 'Entrepreneurship: a survey of the litemture', Prepared for the European Commission. Enterprise Directorate Geneml. London. Institute for Development Strategies. Indiana University & Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
7. Azeredo, O. (2007), 'Knowledge sharing within open innovation networks: An analysis of the high tech campus Eindhoven ecosystem'. Faculty or Technology Management, Innovalion Management Master Program. Eindhoven. Eindhoven Technical University Master of Science in Innovation Management. 7 1.
8. Birkinshaw, J., S. A. lIill and G. C. Murray (2004), 'Corporate cntrepreneun.hip: Nothing ventured, nothing gainedT, AIM Research Paper 006.
9. Brown. J. S. (2003) 'Innovating innovation'. in H. W. Chesbrough. Open Innovation: The New Imperalh'e Jor erea/in8 and Profiting Jrom Tedmology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Brown. J. S. and J. Hagel (2006). 'Crclilion nets: Getling Lhe moll rrom open innovation', McKinsey Quarterly, 2,40-51.
11. Burgelman. R. A. (1983), 'Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study'. Managemem Science. 29 (12), 1349-1364.
12. Chesbrough. H. W. (2oo3a). Open innol'Otion: Ihe new imperali-e Jor crearifl8 and profiling/rom lechnology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). A better way to innovate', Harvard Business Re\̇jew. 81 (7).12-13.
14. Chesbrough. H. W. (2003c). 'The era of open innovation'. MIT SIOlUl Management Revie", 44 (3). 35-41.
15. Chesbrough, H. W. (2004). 'Managing open innovation', Research Technology Mallugemem. 47 (1).23-26.
16. Chesbrough. Ii. W. (2006), Open Business Models. Boston. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17. Chiaroni. 0.. V. Chiesa and F. Frattini (2010), 'Unravelling the process from closed to open innovation: Evidence from mature. asset-intensive industries'. R&D MWlQgemenl.40 (3),222-245.
18. Chiaroni, D., V. Chiesa and F. Frauini (2011), 'The open innovation journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm.' Technovatioll.3J (1},34-43.
19. Christensen. C. M. (1997). The InlJovator's Dilemma. Boslon, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Christensen. K. S. (2004).. A classification of the corporate entrepreneurship umbrella: Labels and perspectives', Interna/jollal Journal of Management Enterprise Developmelll. I (4),301-315.
21. Covin, J. G. and M. P. Miles (1999), 'Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage' I ElIlreprelleurship Theory alld Practice. 23 (3).47-63.
22. Czemich. C. H. (2003), 'When do ideas survive in organizations? Variable demands on resource-relatedness and framing efforts of the intrapreneur'. Democracy in a Kllowledge Economy: Annual Meeting a/the Academy of Maflagemenr. SeanJe.
23. Dahlander, L. and D. Gann (2010), 'How open is innovation?', Research Policy, 39, 699-709.
24. De Meyer, A. (1999), 'Using strategic partnerships to create a sustainable competitive position for high tech stan-up finns', R&D Management, 29 (4), 323-328.
25. den Ouden, E., D. Ec and N. Goh, (2008), 'The Philips lnnoHub -generating breakthrough innovation in an open innovation sening'. pdma Visions, 20-21. Available at http://www.thesource.pdma.org/philips-innohub%E2%80%94 general i ng -breakLhrough-j "novalion -.open -in novation -sell i ng (accessed 20 October 2010).
26. Dess, O. Goo R. D. Ireland, S. A. Zahra. S. W. Floyd, J. J. Janney and P. J. Lane (2003), 'Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship'. lournal of Management. 29 (3), 351-378.
27. Dess, G. G., G. T. Lumpkin and J. G. Covin (1997), 'Entrepreneurial strategy making and finn performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models'. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9), 677-695.
28. Docheny. M. (2006), 'Primer on open innovation: Principles and practice'. pdmll Visions, 13-17, avaiJabJe at hup:/Iwww,lhesource.pdma.orglprimer% E2%80%9Copen-innovalion-principlcs-and-practice (accessed 20 October 2010).
29. Dodgson. Moo D. Gann and A. Salter (2006), 'The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble', R&D MOfJQgement, 36 (3),333-346.
30. Doppen, C.S. (2008). 'Research on the role of MiPlaza within the open innovation R&D community'. School of Management and Governance. Business Administration. Innovation Managemenl track. Enschede. ND. Twente University, Master of Science in Business Administration. 76.
31. Drake. M. P., N. Sakkab and R. Jonash (2006), 'Mltltimising return on innovation investment', Research Technology Managemem, 49 (6).32-41.
32. Dyer, J. H. and H. Singh (1998), 'The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage', Academy of Management Review, 23 (4),660-679.
33. Ecsley, D. T. and C. O. Longenecker (2006). 'Gateways to intrapreneurship', Indus/rilll Management, 48 (I), 18-23.
34. Eisenhardt. K. M. (1989), 'Building theories from case study research', Academy of Maflagemelll Review, 14 (4), 532-550.
35. Eisenhardt. K. M. and C. B. Schoonhoven (1996). 'Resource-based view of slralegic aJliance [onnation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms', Organi;;(1Iion Sciellce, 7 (2).136-150.
36. Enkel. E., O. Gassmann and H. W. Chesbrough (2009). 'Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon'. R&D Managemelll. 39 (4),311-316.
37. Ferreira. J. (2002), 'Corporate entrepreneurship: A strategic and structura1 perspective'. International Council for SmaJJ Business 47th World Conference. San Juan, Puerto Rico.
38. Ford, S. J. E. W. Garnsey and D. R. Probert (2010). 'Evolving corporale entrepreneurship strategy: Technology incubation at Philips'. R&D Managemem, 40 (I), 81-90.
39. Ford. S. J. and D. R. Probert (2009), 'Radical innovation through intrapreneurship: Surveying large technology-based firms in the UK I, R&D Management Conference.
40. Ford, S. J. and D. R. Probert (2010), 'Trial by market: The Brightstar incubation experiment',IIIlemafim.oJ JoumaJ of Entrepreneurial Venwrillg, 2 (2), 185-200.
41. Garnsey E. W. E. Starn and B. Thomas (2010), 'The emergence and development of the Cambridge ink jet printing indusrry'. in D. Fomahl. S. Hen and M. Menzel (eds), Emerging Clusters, Thoeretical. Empirical and Political Perspectil.'es 011 the Illitial Stage of Cluster Evolution, Cheltenham. UK and Nonhhamplon. MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
42. Ganner. W, B, (1988). '''Who is an entrepreneur?" Is the wrong question', American Journal o/SIII(1I1 BlIsintss.12 (4),11-32.
43. Gartner, W. B. (1990), 'What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship?'. Journal of Business Venturing,S (1), 15-28.
44. Granstrand. 0.. E. Bohlin, C. Oskarsson and N. Sjoberg (1992), 'EXlernaltechnology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations'. R&D Management. 22 (2). 111 -133.
45. Henderson, R, M, (1993), 'Underinvesunent and i.ncompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry'. RAND JOllrnal 0/ ECOllOlIlics, 24 (2), 248-270.
46. Huston, L. and N. Sallab (2006), 'Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation', Harvard Busi,ress Review, 84 (3), 58-66,
47. Kerr. C. I. V., L. Mortara, R. Phaal and D. R. Probert (2006). 'A conceptual roodel for technology intelligence'. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Pla/millg, I (2).7:-93.
48. Khandwalla. P. N. (1987), 'GeneratOrs of pioneering-innovat.ive management: Some Indian evidence'. Organi:ation Swdies. 8 (1).39-59.
49. Klein. P. G.. A. M. McGahan. C. N. Pitelis and J. T. Mahoney (2010). 'Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship', European Management Re"jew, 7. 1-15,
50. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), 'Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development". Strategic Management Journal. t3. 111-125.
51. Levitt. B. and J. G. March (1988), 'Organizational learning', Annual Review 0/ Sociology, 14,319-340.
52. Lewin, K. (1943), 'Defining lhe field "at a given time'''. Psychological Review. SO (3), 292-310.
53. Lichtenthalcr, E. (2005), 'The choice of technology intelligence methods in multinationals: Towards a contingency approach', Inremmional Journal of Technology Mallagemelli. 32 (3-4), 388-405.
54. Lichtenthnler, E. (2006), 'Technology intelligence: Identificntion of technological opportunities and threats by fIrms'. IlIIernmional Journal of Technology itlielliMet/ce and Planning. 2 (3). 2 9-323.
55. Lichtcnthalcr, U. (2008), 'Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions'. E"gineenng Management. IEEE Transaclions, 55 (I). 148-157.
56. Lichlelllhaler, U. (2009). 'Outbound open innovation and ItS effect on fLJ1Tl performance: Examining environmental innuences', R&D Mwrogemellf, 39 (4), 317-330.
57. Low, M. B. nnd I. C. MacMillan (1988), 'Entrepreneurship: Past research and future ch.llenges', Joumal of Managemenl. 14 (2). 139-161.
58. Ullhje. C. and C. Herstan (2004). 'The lead user method: an outline of empirical findings and issues for future research'. R&D Managemem, 34, 553-568.
59. March. J. G. (1991), 'Exploration and ex.ploitation in organizational learning', Organi:'aliOfI Science, 2 (1),71-87.
60. Menlel. H. C., I. Aaltio and J.M. Ulijn (2007), 'On the way to creativity: Engineers as intrapreneun. in organizations'. Technomt;oll. 27 (12).732-743.
61. Miller. D. (1983), 'The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of finns', Mllllagemem Science, 29 (7), 770-791.
62. Monara, L., C. I. V. Kerr. R. Phanl and D. R. Proben (2009.), 'Technology IOtelligence practice in UK technOlogy-based companies', Imtrnational Journal of Technology Managemem, 48 (I), 115-135.
63. Morolfn. L.. C. I. V. Kerr. R. Phaal and D. R. Proben (2009b), 'A toolbox of elements to build technology inlelligence systems'. Imerna/;onal Journal of Technology MII/Jagemenl, 47 (4),322-345.
64. Monaro. L., J. J. Napp, I. Slacik and T. Min,hall (2009c). How do Large Mf41tinational Companies Implement Ope" Imlm'ation? Institute for Manufacturing -University of Cambridge, Cnmbridge (UK). Available at http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/service/books/form_oi09.htmlaccessed 20 October 2010.
65. Monara, L., J. J. Napp, I. Slacik and T. Min'hall (2010a), 'Implementing open innovmion (01): cultural issues', InternatiOfUlI Journal oj Entrepreneurship and ImlOl'atioll Matfllgemefll. l1 (4),369-397.
66. Monara, L., R. Tho"""n, C. Moore, K. Annara, C. Kerr. R. Ph.al and D. Proben (2010b), 'Developing a technology intelligence slrntegy at Kod.k European Research: Scan and target'. Research Techflology Managemelll. S3 (4), 27-38.
67. Napp, J. J., T. Minshall and D. Proben (2009). 'External corporate venture capital IIlvestment: Towards a framework for capturing and measuring strategic vaJue', PICMET '09 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, Ponland. OR, IEEE.
68. Narayanan, V. K.. Y. Yang and S. A. Zahra (2009). 'Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework'. Research Polic)" 38 (1).58-76.
69. Neyer, A.-K.. A. C. Bullinger and K. M. Moeslein (2009), 'Integrating inside and outside innovators: A sociotechnical systems perspective', R&D Management, 39 (4),41-19.
70. Pennings, J. nnd F. t1arianto (1992). 'Technological networking and innovation implemelllniion', Organization Science. 3 (3). 356-382.
71. Phan, P. H.. M. Wright, D. Ucbasar.n and L. W. Tan (2009), 'Corporate entrepreneurShip: Current research and future directions'. Journal oj Business Venturing, 24 (3).197-205.
72. Pinchot. G. (1985), /nlraprenellr;ng: Why ),ou DolI't HO\'-to uO\'e Ihe Corporation 10 Become an Elllrepreneur, New York: Harper & Row.
73. Rivette. K. G. and Kline, D. (2000). 'Discovering new value in Intellectual property'. Harvard Business Review, I, 54-66.
74. Roberts. E. B. (1988), 'Managing invention and innovation', Research Technology MlIIwcelllent. 31 (I), 11-29.
75. Romijn, H. and N. Albu (2002). 'Innovation. networking and proximity: Lessons from small high technology firms in the UK'. Regional Stlldies. 36 (1),81-86.
76. Rosenberg, N. and R. R. Nelson (1994). 'American universities and technical advance in industries'. Researcll Policy, 23 (3). 323-348.
77. Ryhilnen. T.. M. A. Uusitalo, O. Ildeala (eds) (2010). Nanoterllnologies for FlItllre Mobile Devices, Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
78. Schumpcter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic De\'eiopmem, New Brunswick. NJ: Transaction Publishers.
79. Shane. S. A. and S. Venkataraman (2000). 'The promise of enlrepreneurship as a field of research'. Academy oj Mmwgemellt Review, 25 (1),2 I 7-226.
80. Sharnm. P. and J. J. Chrisman (1999), 'Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues tn the field of corporate entrepreneurship', Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. 23 (3),11-21.
81. Stevenwn, H. H. and J. C. Jarillo (1990), 'A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial managemeṁ. Strategic Managemelll Joumal. 11 (4). 17-27.
82. Slopford, J. M. and C. W. F. Baden-Fuller (1994), 'Creating corporate entrepreneurship'. Strategic Managemelll Journal. 15 (7), 521-536.
83. Teece, D. J. (1986), 'Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration. collaboration. licensing and public policy'. Research Policy, 15 (6), 285-305.
84. Teng, B. S. (2007). 'Corporate entrepreneurship activities through SLralcgic alliances: A resource-based approach toward competitive advantage'. Journal of Managemellt Studies. 44 (1),119-142.
85. Van Dc Ven, A. I-I. (2007). Engaged Scho"lf.'-hip. A Guide Jor OrganizatiOTUll ami Social Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. von Hippel, E. (1988), The SOllrces of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford UniversilY Press.
87. von Hippel. E. (2005), Democrali:.ing Innovation, Boston: The MIT Press.
88. Wagner, 1-1. K. (1991), 'The opeo corporation'. CaliJornia Managemenl ReView. 33 (4).46-50.
89. Wince-Smith. D. L. (1993). 'Driving competitiveness through pannerships', Economic De\'elopmem Quarterly, 7 (1),12-17.
90. Wissema. J. G. and L. Euser (1991), 'Succ-sful innovation through inler-company networks', Long Range Planning, 24 (6), 33-39.
91. Wiueman. S.. G. Slowinski. R. Dirkx, L. Gollob, J. Tao, S. Ward, and S. Miraglia (2006). 'Harnessing external technology for innovation'. Research Technology Managemellf.49 (3).19-27.
92. Zahra. S. A. (1991). 'Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship -An explomtory study'. Journal of Business Venturing. 6 (4), 259-285.
93. Zahra. S. A. (1995), 'Corporate entrepreneurship and financial perfomlance: The case of management leveraged buyouts'. Journal of Busirless Venturillg. JO (3), 225-247