Potential reproductive rate of a sex-role reversed pipefish over several bouts of mating

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 747-753

  Scobell, Sunny K ^a   Fudickar, Adam M ^a   Knapp, Rosemary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

gulf pipefish; life history theory; ovarian morphology; pipefish; potential reproductive rate; sex role reversal; sexual selection; Syngnathidae; Syngnathus scovelli

Indexed keywords

LIFE HISTORY THEORY; MORPHOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE PRODUCTIVITY; SEX REVERSAL; SEX ROLE; SEXUAL SELECTION; TELEOST; TRADE-OFF;

SYNGNATHIDAE; SYNGNATHUS SCOVELLI;

EID: 69249213924     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.036     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahnesjö I. Temperature affects male and female potential reproductive rates differently in the sex-role reversed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle. Behavioral Ecology 6 (1995) 229-233
2. Ahnesjö I., Kvarnemo C., and Merilaita S. Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate. Behavioral Ecology 12 (2001) 397-401
3. Andersson M. Sexual Selection (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
4. Begovac P.C., and Wallace R.A. Ovary of the pipefish, Syngnathus scovelli. Journal of Morphology 193 (1987) 117-133
5. Begovac P.C., and Wallace R.A. Stages of oocyte development in the pipefish, Syngnathus scovelli. Journal of Morphology 197 (1988) 353-369
6. Berglund A., and Rosenqvist G. Sex role reversal in pipefish. Advances in the Study of Behavior 32 (2003) 131-167
7. Berglund A., Rosenqvist G., and Svensson I. Multiple matings and paternal brood care in the pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Oikos 51 (1988) 184-188
8. Berglund A., Rosenqvist G., and Svensson I. Reproductive success of females limited by males in two pipefish species. American Naturalist 133 (1989) 506-516
9. Brown, J. D. 1972. A comparative life history study of four species of pipefishes (family Syngnathidae) in Florida. Ph.D. thesis, Univeristy of Florida, Gainesville.
10. Brown H., and Prescott R. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine (1999), J. Wiley, West Sussex
11. Clutton-Brock T.H. The Evolution of Parental Care (1991), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
12. Clutton-Brock T.H. Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour 77 (2009) 3-11
13. Clutton-Brock T.H., and Parker G.A. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 67 (1992) 437-456
14. Clutton-Brock T.H., and Vincent A.C.J. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351 (1991) 58-60
15. Dearborn D.C., Anders A.D., and Parker P.G. Sexual dimorphism, extrapair fertilizations, and operational sex ratio in great frigatebirds (Fregata minor). Behavioral Ecology 12 (2001) 746-752
16. Emlen S.T., and Oring L.W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197 (1977) 215-223
17. Evermann B.W., and Kendall W.C. Description of a new species of pipefish (Siphostoma scovelli) from Corpus Christi, Texas. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 18 (1896) 113-115
18. Forsgren E., Amundsen T., Borg A.A., and Bjelvenmark J. Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 3429 (2004) 551-554
19. Foster S.J., and Vincent A.C.J. Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Fish Biology 65 (2004) 1-61
20. Heubel K.U., Lindström K., and Kokko H. Females increase current reproductive effort when future access to males is uncertain. Biology Letters 4 (2008) 224-227
21. Jones A.G., and Avise J.C. Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal. Molecular Ecology 6 (1997) 203-213
22. Jones A.G., Walker D., and Avise J.C. Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268 (2001) 2531-2535
23. Jones A.G., Moore G.I., Kvarnemo C., Walker D., and Avise J.C. Sympatric speciation as a consequence of male pregnancy in seahorses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 100 (2003) 6598-6603
24. Joseph, E. B. 1957. A study of the systematics and life history of the gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli (Evermann and Kendall). Ph.D. thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
25. Kokko H., and Monaghan P. Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecology Letters 4 (2001) 159-165
26. Kvarnemo C. Temperature differentially affects male and female reproductive rates in the sand goby: consequences for operational sex ratio. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 256 (1994) 151-156
27. Kvarnemo C., and Ahnesjö I. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11 (1996) 404-408
28. Kvarnemo C., and Simmons L.W. Male potential reproductive rate influences mate choice in a bushcricket. Animal Behaviour 55 (1998) 1499-1506
29. Masonjones H.D., and Lewis S.M. Differences in potential reproductive rates of male and female seahorses related to courtship roles. Animal Behaviour 59 (2000) 11-20
30. Preston B.T., Stevenson I.R., Pemberton J.M., Coltman D.W., and Wilson K. Male mate choice influences promiscuity in Soay sheep. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272 (2005) 365-373
31. Reid G.K. An ecological study of the Gulf of Mexico fishes, in the vicinity of Cedar Key, Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean 4 (1954) 1-94
32. Roff D.A. Life History Evolution (2002), Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts
33. Rosenqvist G. Male mate choice and female-female competition for mates in the pipefish Nerophis ophidian. Animal Behaviour 39 (1990) 1110-1115
34. Selman K., Wallace R.A., and Player D. Ovary of the seahorse, Hippocampus erectus. Journal of Morphology 209 (1991) 285-304
35. Silva K., Vieira M.N., Almada V.C., and Monteiro N.M. Can the limited marsupium space be a limiting factor for Syngnathus abaster females? Insights from a population with size-assortative mating. Journal of Animal Ecology 77 (2008) 390-394
36. Sogabe A., and Yanagisawa Y. Sex-role reversal of a monogamous pipefish without higher potential reproductive rate in females. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274 (2007) 2959-2963
37. Sogabe A., Matsumoto K., and Yanagisawa Y. Mate change reduces the reproductive rate of males in a monogamous pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus: the benefit of long-term pair bonding. Ethology 113 (2007) 764-771
38. Sogabe A., Matsumoto K., Ohashi M., Watanabe A., Takata H., Murakami Y., Omori K., and Yanagisawa Y. A monogamous pipefish has the same type of ovary as observed in monogamous seahorses. Biology Letters 4 (2008) 362-365
39. Stearns S.C. The Evolution of Life Histories (1992), Oxford University Press, Oxford
40. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B. (Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (1972), Aldine, Chicago 136-179
41. Vincent A.C.J., and Sadler L.M. Faithful pair bonds in wild seahorses, Hippocampus whitei. Animal Behaviour 50 (1995) 1557-1569
42. Vincent A.C.J., Ahnesjö I., Berglund A., and Rosenqvist G. Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7 (1992) 237-241
43. Vincent A.C.J., Ahnesjö I., and Berglund A. Operational sex ratios and behavioral sex differences in a pipefish population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34 (1994) 435-442
44. Wallace R.A., and Selman K. Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. American Zoologist 21 (1981) 325-343
45. Watanabe S., Hara M., and Watanabe Y. Male internal fertilization and introsperm-like sperm of the seaweed pipefish (Syngnathus schlegeli). Zoological Science 17 (2000) 759-767
46. Wiklund C., Kaitala A., and Wedell N. Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly. Behavioral Ecology 9 (1998) 20-25
47. Wilson A.B. Fecundity selection predicts Bergmann's rule in syngnathid fishes. Molecular Ecology 18 (2009) 1263-1272
48. Zera A.J., and Harshman L.G. Physiology of life history trade-offs in animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32 (2001) 95-126