Spatial segregation of adaptation and predictive sensitization in retinal ganglion cells

Neuron

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 541-554

  Kastner, David B ^a   Baccus, Stephen A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; GABAERGIC SYSTEM; MOUSE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RABBIT; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA RECEPTIVE FIELD; SALAMANDER; SENSITIZATION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SENSORY SYSTEM; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AMBYSTOMA; AMINOBUTYRATES; ANIMALS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID AGONISTS; GABA ANTAGONISTS; GLYCINE AGENTS; LARVA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PICROTOXIN; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETINA; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; STRYCHNINE; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84881485319     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Asari H., Meister M. Divergence of visual channels in the inner retina. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:1581-1589.
2. Atick J. Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?. Network 1992, 3:213-251.
3. Baccus S.A., Meister M. Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 2002, 36:909-919.
4. Barlow H.B. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J.Physiol. 1953, 119:69-88.
5. Barlow H.B., Fitzhugh R., Kuffler S.W. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J.Physiol. 1957, 137:338-354.
6. Beaudoin D.L., Borghuis B.G., Demb J.B. Cellular basis for contrast gain control over the receptive field center of mammalian retinal ganglion cells. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:2636-2645.
7. Berry M.J., Brivanlou I.H., Jordan T.A., Meister M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 1999, 398:334-338.
8. Blakemore C., Campbell F.W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J.Physiol. 1969, 203:237-260.
9. Bonin V., Mante V., Carandini M. The suppressive field of neurons in lateral geniculate nucleus. J.Neurosci. 2005, 25:10844-10856.
10. Bower T. Development of object-permanence: some studies of existence constancy. Percept. Psychophys. 1967, 2:411-418.
11. Bölinger D., Gollisch T. Closed-loop measurements of iso-response stimuli reveal dynamic nonlinear stimulus integration in the retina. Neuron 2012, 73:333-346.
12. Brown S.P., Masland R.H. Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:44-51.
13. Camp A.J., Tailby C., Solomon S.G. Adaptable mechanisms that regulate the contrast response of neurons in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:5009-5021.
14. Chance F.S., Abbott L.F., Reyes A.D. Gain modulation from background synaptic input. Neuron 2002, 35:773-782.
15. Chichilnisky E.J., Kalmar R.S. Functional asymmetries in ON and OFF ganglion cells of primate retina. J.Neurosci. 2002, 22:2737-2747.
16. de Vries S.E.J., Baccus S.A., Meister M. The projective field of a retinal amacrine cell. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:8595-8604.
17. DeWeese M., Zador A.M. Asymmetric dynamics in optimal variance adaptation. Neural Comput. 1998, 10:1179-1202.
18. Fairhall A.L., Lewen G.D., Bialek W., de Ruyter Van Steveninck R.R. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 2001, 412:787-792.
19. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J.Opt. Soc. Am. A 1987, 4:2379-2394.
20. Field G.D., Rieke F. Nonlinear signal transfer from mouse rods to bipolar cells and implications for visual sensitivity. Neuron 2002, 34:773-785.
21. Frazor R.A., Geisler W.S. Local luminance and contrast in natural images. Vision Res. 2006, 46:1585-1598.
22. Garvert M.M., Gollisch T. Local and global contrast adaptation in retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 2013, 77:915-928.
23. Geisler W.S., Perry J.S. Contour statistics in natural images: grouping across occlusions. Vis. Neurosci. 2009, 26:109-121.
24. Gollisch T., Meister M. Eye smarter than scientists believed: neural computations in circuits of the retina. Neuron 2010, 65:150-164.
25. Graziano M.S., Hu X.T., Gross C.G. Coding the locations of objects in the dark. Science 1997, 277:239-241.
26. Heidelberger R., Matthews G. Calcium influx and calcium current in single synaptic terminals of goldfish retinal bipolar neurons. J.Physiol. 1992, 447:235-256.
27. Hosoya T., Baccus S.A., Meister M. Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 2005, 436:71-77.
28. Jarsky T., Cembrowski M., Logan S.M., Kath W.L., Riecke H., Demb J.B., Singer J.H. A synaptic mechanism for retinal adaptation to luminance and contrast. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:11003-11015.
29. Kastner D.B., Baccus S.A. Coordinated dynamic encoding in the retina using opposing forms of plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:1317-1322.
30. Körding K.P., Wolpert D.M. Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:319-326.
31. Kuffler S.W. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J.Neurophysiol. 1953, 16:37-68.
32. Laughlin S.B. A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z Naturforsch. C. Biosci. 1981, 36:910-912.
33. Li G.-L., Vigh J., von Gersdorff H. Short-term depression at the reciprocal synapses between a retinal bipolar cell terminal and amacrine cells. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:7377-7385.
34. Logothetis N.K., Sheinberg D.L. Visual object recognition. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1996, 19:577-621.
35. Lukasiewicz P.D., Maple B.R., Werblin F.S. A novel GABA receptor on bipolar cell terminals in the tiger salamander retina. J.Neurosci. 1994, 14:1202-1212.
36. Manookin M.B., Demb J.B. Presynaptic mechanism for slow contrast adaptation in mammalian retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 2006, 50:453-464.
37. Manu M., Baccus S.A. Disinhibitory gating of retinal output by transmission from an amacrine cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:18447-18452.
38. Nikolaev A., Leung K.-M., Odermatt B., Lagnado L. Synaptic mechanisms of adaptation and sensitization in the retina. Nat. Neurosci. 2013.
39. Olveczky B.P., Baccus S.A., Meister M. Segregation of object and background motion in the retina. Nature 2003, 423:401-408.
40. Olveczky B.P., Baccus S.A., Meister M. Retinal adaptation to object motion. Neuron 2007, 56:689-700.
41. Ozuysal Y., Baccus S.A. Linking the computational structure of variance adaptation to biophysical mechanisms. Neuron 2012, 73:1002-1015.
42. Pitkow X., Meister M. Decorrelation and efficient coding by retinal ganglion cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:628-635.
43. Rieke F. Temporal contrast adaptation in salamander bipolar cells. J.Neurosci. 2001, 21:9445-9454.
44. Ringach D.L., Malone B.J. The operating point of the cortex: neurons as large deviation detectors. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:7673-7683.
45. Sagdullaev B.T., Eggers E.D., Purgert R., Lukasiewicz P.D. Nonlinear interactions between excitatory and inhibitory retinal synapses control visual output. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:15102-15112.
46. Schwartz G., Rieke F. Perspectives on: information and coding in mammalian sensory physiology: nonlinear spatial encoding by retinal ganglion cells: when 1+ 1 ≠ 2. J.Gen. Physiol. 2011, 138:283-290.
47. Schwartz O., Hsu A.A., Dayan P.P. Space and time in visual context. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:522-535.
48. Solomon S.G., White A.J.R., Martin P.R. Extraclassical receptive field properties of parvocellular, magnocellular, and koniocellular cells in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. J.Neurosci. 2002, 22:338-349.
49. Stocker A., Simoncelli E.P. Sensory adaptation within a Bayesian framework for perception. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2006, 18:1289.
50. Thoreson W.B., Mangel S.C. Lateral interactions in the outer retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2012, 31:407-441.
51. van Hateren J.H. Processing of natural time series of intensities by the visual system of the blowfly. Vision Res. 1997, 37:3407-3416.
52. Victor J.D., Shapley R.M. The nonlinear pathway of Y ganglion cells in the cat retina. J.Gen. Physiol. 1979, 74:671-689.
53. Wark B., Fairhall A.L., Rieke F. Timescales of inference in visual adaptation. Neuron 2009, 61:750-761.
54. Werblin F.S. Lateral interactions at inner plexiform layer of vertebrate retina: antagonistic responses to change. Science 1972, 175:1008-1010.
55. Wissig S.C., Kohn A.A. The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex. J.Neurophysiol. 2012, 107:3370-3384.
56. Yuille A., Kersten D. Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:301-308.
57. Zaghloul K.A., Boahen K., Demb J.B. Different circuits for ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells cause different contrast sensitivities. J.Neurosci. 2003, 23:2645-2654.
58. Zhang Y., Kim I.-J., Sanes J.R., Meister M. The most numerous ganglion cell type of the mouse retina is a selective feature detector. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:E2391-E2398.