Sensory adaptation within a Bayesian framework for perception

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1289-1296

  Stocker, Alan A ^a   Simoncelli, Eero P ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ESTIMATORS; BAYESIAN FRAMEWORKS; DISCRIMINABILITY; HUMAN MOTIONS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; OPERATIONAL RANGE; PERCEPTUAL EFFECTS; PRIOR DISTRIBUTION;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 84864055997     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. K. Körding and D. Wolpert. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427(15):244-247, January 2004.
2. D C Knill and W Richards, editors. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
3. Y. Weiss, E. Simoncelli, and E. Adelson. Motion illusions as optimal percept. Nature Neuroscience, 5(6):598-604, June 2002.
4. H.B. Barlow. Vision: Coding and Efficiency, chapter A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects, pages 363-375. Cambridge University Press., 1990.
5. M.J. Wainwright. Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Research, 39:3960-3974, 1999.
6. N. Brenner, W. Bialek, and R. de Ruyter van Steveninck. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron, 26:695-702, June 2000.
7. S.M. Smirnakis, M.J. Berry, D.K. Warland, W. Bialek, and M. Meister. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature, 386:69-73, March 1997.
8. P. Thompson. Velocity after-effects: the effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli. Vision Research, 21:337-345, 1980.
9. A.T. Smith. Velocity coding: evidence from perceived velocity shifts. Vision Research, 25(12):1969-1976, 1985.
10. P. Schrater and E. Simoncelli. Local velocity representation: evidence from motion adaptation. Vision Research, 38:3899-3912, 1998.
11. C.W. Clifford. Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(3):136-143, March 2002.
12. C. Clifford and P.Wenderoth. Adaptation to temporal modulaton can enhance differential speed sensitivity. Vision Research, 39:4324-4332, 1999.
13. A. Kristjansson. Increased sensitivity to speed changes during adaptation to first-order, but not to second-order motion. Vision Research, 41:1825-1832, 2001.
14. R.E. Phinney, C. Bowd, and R. Patterson. Direction-selective coding of stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion. Vision Research, 37(7):865-869, 1997.
15. N.M. Grzywacz and R.M. Balboa. A Bayesian framework for sensory adaptation. Neural Computation, 14:543-559, 2002.
16. A.A. Stocker and E.P. Simoncelli. Constraining a Bayesian model of human visual speed perception. In Lawrence K. Saul, Yair Weiss, and Léon Bottou, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems NIPS 17, pages 1361-1368, Cambridge, MA, 2005. MIT Press.
17. D. Tranchina, J. Gordon, and R.M. Shapley. Retinal light adaptation - evidence for a feedback mechanism. Nature, 310:314-316, July 1984.
18. S. Deneve. Bayesian inference in spiking neurons. In Lawrence K. Saul, Yair Weiss, and Léon Bottou, editors, Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS*04), vol 17, Cambridge, MA, 2005. MIT Press.
19. R. Rao. Hierarchical Bayesian inference in networks of spiking neurons. In Lawrence K. Saul, Yair Weiss, and Léon Bottou, editors, Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS*04), vol 17, Cambridge, MA, 2005. MIT Press.