Linking the Computational Structure of Variance Adaptation to Biophysical Mechanisms

Neuron

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1002-1015

  Ozuysal, Yusuf ^a,c   Baccus, Stephen A ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHANNEL GATING; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA BIPOLAR GANGLION CELL; SALAMANDER; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYNAPSE VESICLE; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AMACRINE CELLS; ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; RETINAL BIPOLAR CELLS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; URODELA; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84858036313     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.029     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Atick J.J. Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?. Network 1992, 3:213-251.
2. Baccus S.A. From a whisper to a roar: adaptation to the mean and variance of naturalistic sounds. Neuron 2006, 51:682-684.
3. Baccus S.A., Meister M. Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 2002, 36:909-919.
4. Baccus S.A., Olveczky B.P., Manu M., Meister M. A retinal circuit that computes object motion. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:6807-6817.
5. Baylor D.A., Hodgkin A.L. Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. J. Physiol. 1974, 242:729-758.
6. Beaudoin D.L., Borghuis B.G., Demb J.B. Cellular basis for contrast gain control over the receptive field center of mammalian retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2636-2645.
7. Beaudoin D.L., Manookin M.B., Demb J.B. Distinct expressions of contrast gain control in parallel synaptic pathways converging on a retinal ganglion cell. J. Physiol. 2008, 586:5487-5502.
8. Bonin V., Mante V., Carandini M. The statistical computation underlying contrast gain control. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:6346-6353.
9. Borst A., Flanagin V.L., Sompolinsky H. Adaptation without parameter change: Dynamic gain control in motion detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:6172-6176.
10. Burkhardt D.A., Fahey P.K., Sikora M.A. Retinal bipolar cells: temporal filtering of signals from cone photoreceptors. Vis. Neurosci. 2007, 24:765-774.
11. Burrone J., Lagnado L. Synaptic depression and the kinetics of exocytosis in retinal bipolar cells. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:568-578.
12. Chander D., Chichilnisky E.J. Adaptation to temporal contrast in primate and salamander retina. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:9904-9916.
13. Chichilnisky E.J. A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network 2001, 12:199-213.
14. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A.G. Relaxation and fluctuations of membrane currents that flow through drug-operated channels. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1977, 199:231-262.
15. Cook P.B., McReynolds J.S. Lateral inhibition in the inner retina is important for spatial tuning of ganglion cells. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1:714-719.
16. Demb J.B. Functional circuitry of visual adaptation in the retina. J. Physiol. 2008, 586:4377-4384.
17. DeVries S.H. Bipolar cells use kainate and AMPA receptors to filter visual information into separate channels. Neuron 2000, 28:847-856.
18. DeVries S.H., Schwartz E.A. Kainate receptors mediate synaptic transmission between cones and 'Off' bipolar cells in a mammalian retina. Nature 1999, 397:157-160.
19. DeWeese M., Zador A. Asymmetric dynamics in optimal variance adaptation. Neural Comput. 1998, 10:1179-1202.
20. Dunn F.A., Lankheet M.J., Rieke F. Light adaptation in cone vision involves switching between receptor and post-receptor sites. Nature 2007, 449:603-606.
21. Fairhall A.L., Lewen G.D., Bialek W., de Ruyter Van Steveninck R.R. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 2001, 412:787-792.
22. Fairhall A.L., Burlingame C.A., Narasimhan R., Harris R.A., Puchalla J.L., Berry M.J. Selectivity for multiple stimulus features in retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:2724-2738.
23. Friedlander T., Brenner N. Adaptive response by state-dependent inactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:22558-22563.
24. Gaudry K.S., Reinagel P. Contrast adaptation in a nonadapting LGN model. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:1287-1296.
25. Gollisch T., Meister M. Eye smarter than scientists believed: neural computations in circuits of the retina. Neuron 2010, 65:150-164.
26. Gomis A., Burrone J., Lagnado L. Two actions of calcium regulate the supply of releasable vesicles at the ribbon synapse of retinal bipolar cells. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19:6309-6317.
27. He Y., Zorumski C.F., Mennerick S. Contribution of presynaptic Na(+) channel inactivation to paired-pulse synaptic depression in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 87:925-936.
28. Heidelberger R., Matthews G. Calcium influx and calcium current in single synaptic terminals of goldfish retinal bipolar neurons. J. Physiol. 1992, 447:235-256.
29. Hodgkin A.L., Huxley A.F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 1952, 117:500-544.
30. Hosoya T.H., Baccus S.A., Meister M. Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 2005, 436:71-77.
31. Jolivet R., Lewis T.J., Gerstner W. Generalized integrate-and-fire models of neuronal activity approximate spike trains of a detailed model to a high degree of accuracy. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92:959-976.
32. Keat J., Reinagel P., Reid R.C., Meister M. Predicting every spike: a model for the responses of visual neurons. Neuron 2001, 30:803-817.
33. Kim K.J., Rieke F. Temporal contrast adaptation in the input and output signals of salamander retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:287-299.
34. Kim K.J., Rieke F. Slow Na+ inactivation and variance adaptation in salamander retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:1506-1516.
35. Laughlin S.B. The role of sensory adaptation in the retina. J. Exp. Biol. 1989, 146:39-62.
36. Luenberger D.G. Introduction to Dynamic Systems: Theory, Models and Applications 1979, Wiley, New York.
37. Ma W., Trusina A., El-Samad H., Lim W.A., Tang C. Defining network topologies that can achieve biochemical adaptation. Cell 2009, 138:760-773.
38. Manookin M.B., Demb J.B. Presynaptic mechanism for slow contrast adaptation in mammalian retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 2006, 50:453-464.
39. Mante V., Frazor R.A., Bonin V., Geisler W.S., Carandini M. Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1690-1697.
40. Mante V., Bonin V., Carandini M. Functional mechanisms shaping lateral geniculate responses to artificial and natural stimuli. Neuron 2008, 58:625-638.
41. Mennerick S., Matthews G. Ultrafast exocytosis elicited by calcium current in synaptic terminals of retinal bipolar neurons. Neuron 1996, 17:1241-1249.
42. Nagel K.I., Doupe A.J. Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain. Neuron 2006, 51:845-859.
43. Neves G., Lagnado L. The kinetics of exocytosis and endocytosis in the synaptic terminal of goldfish retinal bipolar cells. J. Physiol. 1999, 515:181-202.
44. Ohzawa I., Sclar G., Freeman R.D. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J. Neurophysiol. 1985, 54:651-667.
45. Olveczky B.P., Baccus S.A., Meister M. Retinal adaptation to object motion. Neuron 2007, 56:689-700.
46. Pillow J.W., Paninski L., Uzzell V.J., Simoncelli E.P., Chichilnisky E.J. Prediction and decoding of retinal ganglion cell responses with a probabilistic spiking model. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:11003-11013.
47. Rabl K., Cadetti L., Thoreson W.B. Paired-pulse depression at photoreceptor synapses. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:2555-2563.
48. Rea R., Li J., Dharia A., Levitan E.S., Sterling P., Kramer R.H. Streamlined synaptic vesicle cycle in cone photoreceptor terminals. Neuron 2004, 41:755-766.
49. Rieke F. Temporal contrast adaptation in salamander bipolar cells. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21:9445-9454.
50. Rizzoli S.O., Betz W.J. Synaptic vesicle pools. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6:57-69.
51. Rudd M.E., Brown L.G. Noise adaptation in integrate-and fire neurons. Neural Comput. 1997, 9:1047-1069.
52. Shapley R.M., Victor J.D. The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. J. Physiol. 1978, 285:275-298.
53. Shapley R., Victor J.D. The contrast gain control of the cat retina. Vision Res. 1979, 19:431-434.
54. Smirnakis S.M., Berry M.J., Warland D.K., Bialek W., Meister M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature 1997, 386:69-73.
55. Van Hateren J.H. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of early vision. Vision Res. 1993, 33:257-267.
56. Victor J.D. The dynamics of the cat retinal X cell centre. J. Physiol. 1987, 386:219-246.
57. Wark B., Fairhall A., Rieke F. Timescales of inference in visual adaptation. Neuron 2009, 61:750-761.
58. Zaghloul K.A., Boahen K., Demb J.B. Contrast adaptation in subthreshold and spiking responses of mammalian Y-type retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:860-868.