Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework

Corporate Governance: An International Review

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 468-494

  Ntim, Collins G ^a   Soobaroyen, Teerooven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Corporate financial performance; Corporate governance; Corporate social responsibility; Neo institutional theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881362401     PISSN: 09648410     EISSN: 14678683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12026     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Adams, C. A. 2002. Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15: 223-250.
2. Aguilera, R. V. & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2004. Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25: 415-443.
3. Aguilera, R. V. & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2009. Codes of good governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 376-387.
4. Aguilera, R. V. & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management, 28: 447-462.
5. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C., & Granapathi, J. 2007. Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836-863.
6. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. 2006. Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 147-158.
7. Andres, C. 2008. Large shareholders and firm performance - An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14: 431-445.
8. Arora, P. & Dharwadkar, R. 2011. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19: 136-152.
9. Ashforth, B. E. & Gibbs, B. W. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1: 177-193.
10. Barako, D. G. & Brown, A. M. 2008. Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12: 309-324.
11. Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. 2006. Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 107-125.
12. Barnea, A. & Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97: 71-86.
13. Becchetti, L. & Ciciretti, R. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Applied Financial Economics, 19: 1283-1293.
14. Beekes, W. & Brown, P. 2006. Do better-governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33: 424-450.
15. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M. M., & Zimmermann, H. 2006. An integrated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management, 12: 249-283.
16. Bird, R., Hall, A. D., Momente, F., & Reggiani, F. 2007. What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market? Journal of Business Ethics, 76: 189-206.
17. Bozec, R. & Bozec, Y. 2012. The use of governance indexes in the governance-performance relationship literature: International evidence. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29: 79-98.
18. Brammer, S. & Pavelin, S. 2008. Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy & the Environment, 17: 120-136.
19. Branco, M. C. & Rodrigues, L. L. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69: 111-132.
20. Branco, M. C. & Rodrigues, L. L. 2008. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosures by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 685-701.
21. Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. 2012. Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108: 53-72.
22. Callado-Munoz, J. & Ultrero-Gonzalez, N. 2011. Does it pay to be socially responsible? Evidence from Spain's retail banking sector. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 755-787.
23. Campbell, D., Craven, B., & Shrives, P. 2003. Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16: 558-581.
24. Campbell, D., Moore, G., & Shrives, P. 2006. Cross-sectional effects in community disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19: 96-114.
25. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38: 33-53.
26. Chen, J. C. & Roberts, R. W. 2010. Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization-society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics, 97: 651-665.
27. Cheng, S., Evans, J. H., & Nagarajan, N. J. 2008. Board size and firm performance: Moderating effects of the market for corporate control. Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 31: 121-145.
28. Cicon, J. E., Ferris, S. P., Kammel, A. J., & Noronha, G. 2012. European corporate governance: A thematic analysis of national codes of governance. European Financial Management, 18: 620-648.
29. Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87: 329-356.
30. Collett, P. & Hrasky, S. 2005. Voluntary disclosure of corporate governance practices by listed Australian companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13: 188-196.
31. Cressy, R., Cumming, D., & Mallin, C. 2010. Entrepreneurship, governance and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 95: 117-120.
32. Cumming, D., Fleming, G., Johan, S., & Takeuchi, M. 2010. Legal protection, corruption and private equity returns in Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 95: 173-193.
33. Dam, L. & Scholtens, B. 2012. Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20: 233-252.
34. Deegan, C. 2002. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures - A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15: 282-311.
35. Devinney, T. M. 2009. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 44-56.
36. DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
37. DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91.
39. Elkington, J. 2006. Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 522-529.
40. Eng, L. L. & Mak, Y. T. 2003. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22: 325-345.
41. Fifka, M. S. 2013. Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective - A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22: 1-35.
42. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
43. Freeman, R. E. & Reed, D. L. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25: 88-106.
44. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13: 32-33.
45. Frye, M. B., Nelling, E., & Webb, E. 2006. Executive compensation in socially responsible firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 446-455.
46. Gibson, K. & O'Donovan, G. 2007. Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 944-956.
47. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 107-155.
48. Graham, J. R. & Harvey, C. R. 2001. The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60: 187-243.
49. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8: 47-77.
50. Guest, P. M. 2009. The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Finance, 15: 385-404.
51. Gujarati, D. N. 2003. Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52. Hackston, D. & Milne, M. J. 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9: 77-108.
53. Haniffa, R. M. & Cooke, T. E. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24: 391-430.
54. Harjoto, M. A. & Jo, H. 2011. Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100: 45-67.
55. Henry, D. 2008. Corporate governance structure and the valuation of Australian firms: Is there value in ticking the boxes? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35: 912-942.
56. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Luce, R. A. 2001. Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business & Society, 40: 295-314.
57. Hooks, J. & Van Staden, C. J. 2011. Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures. British Accounting Review, 43: 200-213.
58. Hou, W. & Moore, G. 2010. Player and referee roles held jointly: The effect of state ownership on China's regulatory enforcement against fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 95: 317-335.
59. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 443-459.
60. Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48: 831-880.
61. Jensen, M. C. 2002. Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12: 235-247.
62. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
63. Jia, C., Ding, S., Li, Y., & Wu, Z. 2009. Fraud, enforcement action, and the role of corporate governance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 90: 561-576.
64. Jo, H. & Harjoto, M. A. 2011. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103: 351-383.
65. Jo, H. & Harjoto, M. A. 2012. The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 106: 53-72.
66. Johan, S. A. & Najar, D. 2010. The role of corruption, culture, and law in investment fund manager fees. Journal of Business Ethics, 95: 147-172.
67. Judge, W. 2012. Editorial - Pioneering research in comparative corporate governance: The role of special issues. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20: 1-2.
68. Judge, W. Q., Douglas, T. J., & Kutan, A. M. 2008. Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management, 34: 765-785.
69. Judge, W., Li, S., & Pinsker, R. 2010. National adoption of international accounting standards: An institutional perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18: 161-174.
70. Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. 2012. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1336-0 .
71. King Committee 1994, 2002 and 2010. King reports on corporate governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute of Directors.
72. Larcker, D. F. & Rusticus, T. O. 2010. On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 49: 186-205.
73. Lattemann, C., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Li, S., & Schneider, A. M. 2009. CSR communication intensity in Chinese and Indian multinational companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 426-442.
74. Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Campbell, T. T. 2010. Corporate social responsibility practices in developing and transitional countries: Botswana and Malawi. Journal of Business Ethics, 90: 429-440.
75. Lo, S. F. & Sheu, H. J. 2007. Is corporate sustainability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 345-358.
76. London Stock Exchange (LSE) 2007. Corporate governance update - CSR reporting is "excessive burden". Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 96-100.
77. Mackenzie, C. 2007. Boards, incentives and corporate responsibility: The case for a change of emphasis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 935-943.
78. Mahadeo, J. D., Oogarah-Hanuman, V., & Soobaroyen, T. 2011. A longitudinal study of corporate social disclosures in a developing economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 545-558.
79. Mahadeo, J. D., Soobaroyen, T., & Oogarah-Hanuman, V. 2012. Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105: 375-388.
80. Mahoney, L. & Roberts, R. W. 2007. Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31: 233-253.
81. Mallin, C. 2002. The relationship between corporate governance, transparency and financial disclosure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10: 253-255.
82. Mallin, C. A. 2006. Handbook on international corporate governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
83. Mallin, C. A. 2007. Corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84. McConnell, J. & Servaes, H. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27: 595-612.
85. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 854-872.
86. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 603-609.
87. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 117-127.
88. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1-18.
89. Meyer, J. & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363.
90. Michelon, G. & Parbonetti, A. 2012. The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16: 477-509.
91. Mizruchi, M. & Fein, L. 1999. The construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 653-683.
92. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 293-315.
93. Nelling, E. & Webb, E. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The "virtuous circle" revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 32: 197-209.
94. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Norton.
95. Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., & Danbolt, J. 2012a. The relative value relevance of shareholder versus stakeholder corporate governance disclosure policy reforms in South Africa. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20: 84-105.
96. Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., Danbolt, J., & Thomas, D. A. 2012b. Voluntary corporate governance disclosures by post-apartheid South African listed corporations. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13: 122-144.
97. Ntim, C. G. & Soobaroyen, T. 2013. Black economic empowerment disclosures by South African listed corporations: The influence of ownership and board characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1446-8.
98. Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Martynov, A. 2011. The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 283-297.
99. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403-441.
100. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. 2011. Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society, 50: 6-27.
101. Parker, L. D. 2005. Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18: 842-860.
102. Petersen, M. A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 435-480.
103. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
104. Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. 2008. Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 160-177.
105. Renders, A., Gaeremynck, A., & Sercu, P. 2010. Corporate-governance ratings and performance: A cross-European study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18: 87-106.
106. Reverte, C. 2009. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 351-366.
107. Rhodes, M. J. & Soobaroyen, T. 2010. Information asymmetry and socially responsible investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 95: 145-150.
108. Roberts, R. W. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organization, & Society, 17: 595-612.
109. Scholtens, B. 2007. Financial and social performance of socially responsible investments in the Netherlands. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 1090-1105.
110. Scholtens, B. 2008. A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 68: 46-55.
111. Scott, W. R. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 493-511.
112. Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and organizations, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Soobaroyen, T. & Ntim, C. G. 2013. Social and environmental accounting as symbolic and substantive means of legitimation: The case of HIV/AIDS reporting in South Africa. Accounting Forum, forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.002.
114. Starks, L. T. 2009. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: What do investors care about? What should investors care about? Financial Review, 44: 461-468.
115. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-606.
116. Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., & Collin, S. O. 2009. What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: A study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 16: 352-364.
117. Unerman, J. 2000. Methodological issues: Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13: 667-681.
118. Van der Walt, N. & Ingley, C. 2003. Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11: 218-234.
119. Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120. Yoshikawa, T., Tsui-Auch, L. S., & McGuire, J. 2007. Corporate governance reform as institutional innovation: The case of Japan. Organization Science, 18: 973-988.
121. Young, Z. & Marais, M. 2012. A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20: 432-450.
122. Zattoni, A. & Cuomo, F. 2008. Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 1-15.