Social and environmental accounting as symbolic and substantive means of legitimation: The case of HIV/AIDS reporting in South Africa

Accounting Forum

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 92-109

  Soobaroyen, Teerooven ^a   Ntim, Collins G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

HIV AIDS; Legitimacy theory; Social and environmental accounting; South Africa; Substantive management; Symbolic management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877838586     PISSN: 01559982     EISSN: 14676303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ashforth B.E., Gibbs B.W. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science 1990, 1(2):177-193.
2. Barako D.G., Taplin R.H., Brown A.M. HIV/AIDS information by African companies: An empirical analysis. Journal of Asian and African Studies 2010, 45(4):387-405.
3. Belal A.R. A study of corporate social disclosures in Bangladesh. Managerial Auditing Journal 2001, 16(5):274-289.
4. Belal A.R., Owen D. The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: An engagement-based study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2007, 20(3):472-494.
5. Bouten L., Everaert P., Van Liedekerke L., De Moor L. Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?. Accounting Forum 2011, 35(3):187-204.
6. Cahan S.F., Van Staden C.J. Black economic empowerment, legitimacy and the value added statement: Evidence from post-apartheid South Africa. Accounting and Finance 2009, 49:37-58.
7. Campbell D., Moore G., Shrives P. Cross-sectional effects in community disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2006, 19(1):96-114.
8. Campbell D.J. Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc annual corporate reports, 1969-1997. Accounting Forum 2000, 24(1):80-100.
9. Campbell J.L. Why would corporations behave in Socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32:946-967.
10. Chen J.C., Roberts R.W. Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization-society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 97(4):651-665.
11. CIA Factbook (2011). List of countries by HIV/AIDS adult prevalence rate. Available from Accessed 03.02.11. http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook.
12. Day R., Woodward T. Disclosure of information about employees in the directors' report of UK published financial statements: Substantive or symbolic?. Accounting Forum 2004, 28:43-59.
13. De Villiers C., Van Staden C.J. Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect?. Evidence from Africa. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2006, 31:763-781.
14. Dickinson D. Corporate South Africa's response to HIV/AIDS: Why so Slow?. Journal of Southern African Studies 2004, 30(3):627-650.
15. Dickinson D., Stevens M. Understanding the response of large South African companies to HIV/AIDS. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS 2005, 2(2):286-295.
16. Dowling J., Pfeffer J. Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review 1975, 18(1):122-136.
17. Du Bruyn R. A proposed reporting framework for HIV/AIDS disclosure by listed South African companies. Meditari Accountancy Research 2008, 16(1):59-78.
18. Du Bruyn R., Venter J.M.P. An analysis of the impact of King II on HIV/AIDS disclosure in annual reports. Southern Africa Business Review 2006, 10(1):1-16.
19. Fig D. Manufacturing amnesia: Corporate social responsibility in South Africa. International Affairs 2005, 3:599-617.
20. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach 1984, Pitman, Cambridge.
21. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2003). Reporting guidance on HIV/AIDS. Available from Accessed 03.05.10. http://www.globalreporting.org/LearningAndSupport/GRIPublications/ResearchPublications/OtherResearchPublications.htm.
22. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1995, 8(2):47-77.
23. Guthrie J., Parker L.D. Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research 1989, 19(76):343-352.
24. Hackston D., Milne M.J. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1996, 9(1):77-108.
25. Hooks J., Van Staden C. Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures. British Accounting Review 2011, 43(3):200-213.
26. Hybels R.C. On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: A critical review and integrative theoretical model. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 241-245.
27. King report on corporate governance in South Africa 2002, Institute of Directors (IOD) in Southern Africa, IOD, Johannesburg.
28. Islam M.A., Deegan C. Motivations for an organization within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2008, 21(6):850-874.
29. Laughlin R. A model of financial accountability and the Church of England. Financial Accountability and Management 1990, 6(2):93-114.
30. Lawrence S., Samkin G. A challenge to corporate social reporting: The HIV/AIDS epidemic in South Africa. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 2005, 11:97-116.
31. Lindblom C.K. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Proceedings of the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference 1994.
32. Mahadeo J.D., Oogarah-Hanuman V., Soobaroyen T. Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004-2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories. Accounting Forum 2011, 35(3):158-175.
33. Mahajan A.P., Colvin M., Rudatsikira J., Ettl D. An overview of HIV/AIDS workplace policies and programmes in South Africa. AIDS 2007, 21(3):31-39.
34. Merkl-Davies D.M., Brennan N.B. A conceptual framework of impression management: New insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives. Accounting and Business Research 2011, 41(5):415-437.
35. Mitchell C.G., Hill T. Corporate social and environmental reporting and the impact of internal environmental policy in South Africa. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2009, 16:48-60.
36. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22(4):853-886.
37. Mobus J.L. Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory Context. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2005, 18(4):492-517.
38. Neu D., Warsame H., Pedwell K. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1998, 23(3):265-282.
39. Newson M., Deegan C. Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. International Journal of Accounting 2002, 37:183-213.
40. O'Donovan G. Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2002, 15(3):344-371.
41. Parker L.D. Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2005, 18(6):842-860.
42. Rampersad R. An assessment of corporate governance and HIV/AIDS in the South African corporate sector. African Journal of Business Management 2010, 4(11):2269-2276.
43. Ratanajongkol S., Davey H., Low M. Corporate social reporting in Thailand: The news is all good and increasing. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management 2006, 3(1):67-83.
44. SA Department of Health (2007). HIV & AIDS and STI strategic plan 2007-2011. Available from Accessed 02.07.11. http://www.info.gov.za/otherdocs/2007/aidsplan2007/index.html.
45. SA Department of Health (2010). Country progress report on the declaration of commitment on HIV/AIDS. Available from Accessed 01.12.10. http://www.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/monitoringcountryprogress/2010progressreportssubmittedbycountries/.
46. Spence C. Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2007, 20(6):855-882.
47. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):571-606.
48. Tilling M.V., Tilt C.A. The edge of legitimacy: Voluntary social and environmental reporting in Rothmans' 1956-1999 annual reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2010, 23(1):55-81.
49. UNAIDS (2010). UNAIDS Report on Global AIDS Epidemic. Available from Accessed 05.12.10. http://www.unaids.org/globalreport/Global_report.htm.
50. Unerman J. Methodological issues: Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2000, 13(5):667-681.
51. Vuontisjarvi T. Corporate social reporting in the European context and human resource disclosures: An analysis of Finnish companies. Journal of Business Ethics 2006, 69:331-354.
52. Wallace R.S.O., Naser K. Firm specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1995, 14(4):311-368.
53. Woodward D.G., Edwards P., Birkin F. Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management 1996, 7:329-347.