MEG Correlates of Learning Novel Objects Properties in Children

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Urbain, Charline ^a,b   Bourguignon, Mathieu ^b   Op de Beeck, Marc ^b   Schmitz, Rémy ^a   Galer, Sophie ^a,b   Wens, Vincent ^b   Marty, Brice ^b   De Tiège, Xavier ^b   Van Bogaert, Patrick ^b   Peigneux, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHILD; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED FIELD; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; ORBITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; SCHOOL CHILD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEMANTICS; TEMPORAL LOBE; VERBAL LEARNING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84881176805     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069696     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ware EA, Booth AE, (2010) Form follows function: Learning about function helps children learn about shape. Cognitive Development 25: 124-137.
2. Oakes LM, Madole KL, (2008) Function revisited: How infants construe functional features in their representation of objects. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 36: 135-185.
3. Booth AE, Waxman S, (2002) Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants. Developmental Psychology 38: 948-957.
4. Kemler Nelson DG, Russell R, Duke NS, Jones K, (2000) Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. Child Development 71: 1271-1288.
5. Clark EV, (2004) How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 472-478.
6. Jaswal VK, (2006) Preschoolers favor the creator's label when reasoning about an artifact's function. Cognition 99: B83-B92.
7. Weisberg J, van Turennout M, Martin A, (2007) A Neural System for Learning about Object Function. Cerebral Cortex 17: 513-521.
8. Grönholm P, Rinne JO, Vorobyev V, Laine M, (2005) Naming of newly learned objects: a PET activation study. Cognitive Brain Research 25: 359-371.
9. Hultén A, Vihla M, Laine M, Salmelin R, (2009) Accessing newly learned names and meanings in the native language. Human Brain Mapping 30: 976-989.
10. Cornelissen K, Laine M, Tarkiainen A, Jarvensivu T, Martin N, et al. (2003) Adult brain plasticity elicited by anomia treatment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15: 444-461.
11. Cornelissen K, Laine M, Renvall K, Saarinen T, Martin N, et al. (2004) Learning new names for new objects: Cortical effects as measured by magnetoencephalography. Brain and Language 89: 617-622.
12. Hart JJ, Anand R, Zoccoli S, Maguire M, Gamino J, et al. (2007) Neural substrates of semantic memory. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychological Society 13: 865-880.
13. Tulving E, Schacter DL, (1990) Priming and human memory systems. Science 247: 301-306.
14. Kiefer M, Pulvermüller F (2011) Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex: 1-21.
15. Yee E, Drucker DM, Thompson-Schill SL, (2010) fMRI-adaptation evidence of overlapping neural representations for objects related in function or manipulation. NeuroImage 50: 753-763.
16. Mesulam MM, (1998) From sensation to cognition. Brain 121: 1013-1052.
17. Ishibashi R, Lambon Ralph MA, Saitoa S, Pobric G, (2011) Different roles of lateral anterior temporal lobe and inferior parietal lobule in coding function and manipulation tool knowledge: Evidence from an rTMS study. Neuropsychologia 49: 1128-1135.
18. Lambon Ralph MA, Lowe C, Rogers TT, (2007) Neural basis of category-specific semantic deficits for living things: evidence from semantic dementia, HSVE and a neural network model. Brain 130: 1127-1137.
19. Buxbaum LJ, Saffran EM, (2002) Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language 82: 179-199.
20. Oldfield RC, (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113.
21. Kroll JF, Potter MC, (1984) Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 39-66.
22. Tarr MJ (2006) Available: http://titan.cog.brown.edu:8080/TarrLab/stimuli/novel-objects.
23. New B, Pallier C, Ferrand L, Matos R, (2001) Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique 101: 447-462.
24. De Tiège X, Op de Beeck M, Funke M, Legros B, Parkkonen L, et al. (2008a) Recording epileptic activity with MEG in a light-weight magnetic shield. Epilepsy Research 82: 227-231.
25. Taulu S, Simola J, Matti K, (2005) Applications of the Signal Space Separation Method. IEEE transactions on signal processing 53: 3359-3372.
26. Taulu S, Kajola M, (2005) Presentation of electromagnetic data: the signal space separation method. Journal of Applied Physics 97: 124905.
27. Wehner DT, Hämäläinen MS, Mody M, Ahlfors SP, (2008) Head movements of children in MEG: Quantification, effects on source estimation, and compensation. NeuroImage 40: 541-550.
28. Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ, (2005) Applications of random field theory to electrophysiology. Neuroscience Letters 374: 174-178.
29. Litvak V, Mattout J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Henson R, et al. (2011) EEG and MEG Data Analysis in SPM8 Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2011: 32.
30. Mattout J, Henson RN, Friston KJ (2007a) Canonical source reconstruction for MEG. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2007.
31. Nolte G, (2003) The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Physics in Medicine and Biology 48: 3637-3652.
32. Mattout J, Phillips C, Penny W, Rugg MD, Friston KJ, (2008) MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework. NeuroImage 30: 753-767.
33. Mattout J, Phillips C, Friston KJ (2007b) Bayesian inversion of EEG models. In: Friston KJ, Kiebel S, Nichols T, Penny W, editors. Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain analysis: Academic Press. 367-376.
34. Friston K, Harrison L, Daunizeau J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, et al. (2008b) Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. NeuroImage 39: 1104-1120.
35. Friston KJ, Chu C, Mourão-Miranda J, Hulme O, Rees G, et al. (2008a) Bayesian decoding of brain images. NeuroImage 39: 181-205.
36. Furl N, van Rijsbergen NJ, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ, Treves A, et al. (2010) Modulation of Perception and Brain Activity by Predictable Trajectories of Facial Expressions. Cerebral Cortex 20: 694-703.
37. Furl N, Kumar S, Alter K, Durrant S, Shawe-Taylor J, et al. (2011) Neural prediction of higher-order auditory sequence statistics. NeuroImage 54: 2267-2277.
38. Penny W, Holmes A (2003) Random-effect analysis. In: Frackowiak R, Friston K, Frith C, Dolan R, Price C et al., editors. Human brain function. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
39. Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE, (2005) Conjunction revisited. NeuroImage 25: 661-667.
40. Alt M, Gutmann ML, (2009) Fast mapping semantic features: Performance of adults with normal language, history of disorders of spoken and written language, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on a word-learning task. Journal of Communication Disorders 42: 347-364.
41. Carey S, Bartlett E, (1978) Acquiring a single new word. Child Language Development 15: 17-29.
42. Markson L, Bloom P, (1997) Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature 385: 813-815.
43. Bloom P, (2001) Précis of how children learn the meanings of words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 1095-1134.
44. Faust M, Lavidor M, (2003) Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Lexical decision and semantic judgment. Cognitive Brain Research 17: 585-597.
45. Abdullaev YG, Posner MI, (1997) Time course of activating brain areas in generating verbal associations. Psychological Science 8: 56-59.
46. Seger CA, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE, (2000) Function magnetic resonance imaging evidence for right-hemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships. Neuropsychology 14: 361-369.
47. Goldberg E, Podell K, Lovell M, (1994) Lateralization of frontal lobe functions and cognitive novelty. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 6: 371-378.
48. Goldberg E, Podell K, (1995) Lateralization in the frontal lobes: searching the right (and left) way. Biological Psychiatry 38: 569-571.
49. Goldberg E, Costa LD, (1981) Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems. Brain and Language 14: 144-173.
50. Schmitz R, Pasquali A, Cleeremans A, Peigneux P, (2012) Lateralized implicit sequence learning in uni- and bi-manual conditions. Brain and Cognition 81: 1-9.
51. Bowden EM, Beeman MJ, (1998) Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science 9: 435-440.
52. Beeman MJ, Bowden EM, Gernsbacher MA, (2000) Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language 71: 310-336.
53. Pobric G, Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph MA, (2010) A Amodal semantic representations depend on both anterior temporal lobes: Evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 48: 1336-1342.
54. Lambon Ralph MA, Pobric G, Jefferies E, (2009) Conceptual knowledge is underpinned by temporal pole bilaterally: Convergent evidence from rTMS. Cerebral Cortex 19: 832-838.
55. Richardson MP, Strange BA, Duncan JS, Dolan RJ, (2003) Preserved verbal memory function in left medial temporal pathology involves reorganization of function to right medial temporal lobe. NeuroImage 20: 112-119.
56. Breitenstein C, Jansen A, Deppe M, Foerster A-F, Sommer J, et al. (2005) Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon. NeuroImage 25: 958-968.
57. van Turennout M, Ellmore T, Martin A, (2000) Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system. Nature Neuroscience 3: 1329-1347.
58. Vuilleumier P, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ, (2002) Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience 5: 491-499.
59. Martin A, (2007) The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 25-45.
60. Donnelly KM, Allendorfer JB, Szaflarski JP, (2011) Right hemispheric participation in semantic decision improves performance. Brain Research 1419: 105-116.
61. Hulten A, Laaksonen H, Vihla M, Laine M, Salmelin R, (2010) Modulation of brain activity after learning predicts long-term memory for words. Neuroscience 30: 15160-15164.
62. Bokde ALW, Tagamets M-A, Friedman RB, Horwitz B, (2001) Functional interactions of the inferior frontal cortex during the processing of words and word-like stimuli. Neuron 30: 609-617.
63. Whatmough C, Chertkow H, Murtha S, Hanratty K, (2002) Dissociable brain regions process object meaning and object structure during picture naming. Neuropsychologia 40: 174-186.
64. Blumenfeld HK, Booth JR, Burman DD, (2006) Differential prefrontal-temporal neural correlates of semantic processing in children. Brain and Language 99: 226-235.
65. Bookheimer S, (2002) Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 25: 151-188.
66. Kuriki S, Mori T, Hirata Y, (1999) Motor planning center for speech articulation in the normal human brain. Neuroreport 10: 765-769.
67. Salmelin R, Hari R, Lounasmaa OV, Sams M, (1994) Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming. Nature 368: 463-465.
68. Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Herve PY, Duffau H, Crivello F, et al. (2006) Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage 30: 1414-1432.