Form follows function: Learning about function helps children learn about shape

Cognitive Development

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 124-137

  Ware, Elizabeth A ^a   Booth, Amy E ^b  

^a VITERBO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Early childhood development; Language development; Object function; Shape bias

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952236018     PISSN: 08852014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baldwin D.A. Priorities in children's expectations about object label reference: Form over color. Child Development 1989, 60:1291-1306.
2. Baldwin D.A., Markman E.M., Melartin R.L. Infants' ability to draw inferences about nonobvious object properties: Evidence from exploratory play. Child Development 1993, 64:711-728.
3. Bloom P. Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 1996, 60:1-29.
4. Bloom P. How children learn the meanings of words 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Booth A.E. Object function and categorization in infancy: Two mechanisms of facilitation. Infancy 2006, 10:145-169.
6. Booth A.E. The cause of infant categorization?. Cognition 2008, 106:984-993.
7. Booth A.E. Causal supports for early word learning. Child Development 2009, 80:1243-1250.
8. Booth A.E., Waxman S. Object names and object functions serve as cues to categories for infants. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38:948-957.
9. Colunga E., Smith L.B. Knowledge embedded in process: The self-organization of skilled noun learning. Developmental Science 2008, 11:195-203.
10. Deák G.O., Ray S.D., Pick A.D. Matching and naming objects by shape or function: Age and context effects in preschool children. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38:503-518.
11. Diesendruck G., Bloom P. How specific is the shape bias?. Child Development 2003, 74:168-178.
12. Fenson L., Dale P.S., Reznick J.S., Thal D., Bates E., Hartung J.P., et al. The Macarthur communicative development inventories: User's guide and technical manual 1993, Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA.
13. Gathercole V.C.M., Whitfield L.C. Function as a criterion for the extension of new words. Journal of Child Language 2001, 28:87-125.
14. Gelman S.A., Wellman H.M. Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition 1991, 38:213-244.
15. Gentner D. A study of early word meaning using artificial objects: What looks like a jiggy bit acts like a zimbo?. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 1978, 15:1-6.
16. Gershkoff-Stowe L., Smith L.B. Shape and the first hundred nouns. Child Development 2004, 75:1098-1114.
17. Gopnik A., Sobel D.M. Detecting blickets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development 2000, 71:1205-1222.
18. Gopnik A., Sobel D.M., Schulz L.E., Glymour C. Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology 2001, 37:620-629.
19. Graham S.A., Kilbreath C.S., Welder A.N. Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Development 2004, 75:409-427.
20. Graham S.A., Williams L.D., Huber J.F. Preschoolers' and adults' reliance on object shape and object function for lexical extension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1999, 74:128-151.
21. Jones S.S., Smith L.B. How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science 2002, 5:219-232.
22. Jones S.S., Smith L.B., Landau B. Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. Child Development 1991, 62:499-516.
23. Keil F.C. Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Kemler Nelson D.G., Frankenfield A., Morris C., Blair E. Young children's use of functional information to categorize artifacts: Three factors that matter. Cognition 2000, 77:133-168.
25. Kemler Nelson D.G., Russell R., Duke N., Jones K. Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their function. Child Development 2000, 71:1271-1288.
26. Landau B., Smith L., Jones S. Object shape, object function, and object name. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:1-27.
27. Landau B., Smith L., Jones S. The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development 1988, 3:299-321.
28. Leslie A.M., Keeble S. Do six-month-old infants perceive causality?. Cognition 1987, 25:265-288.
29. Madole K.L., Oakes L.M., Cohen L.B. Developmental-changes in infants' attention to function and form-function correlations. Cognitive Development 1993, 8:189-209.
30. Malt B.C., Johnson E.C. Do artifact concepts have cores. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31:195-217.
31. Markson L., Diesendruck G., Bloom P. The shape of thought. Developmental Science 2008, 11:204-208.
32. Nazzi T., Gopnik A. Sorting and acting with objects in early childhood: An exploration of the use of causal cues. Cognitive Development 2003, 18.
33. Oakes L.M., Cohen L.B. Infant causal perception. Advances in infancy research 1995, Vol. 9:1-54. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
34. Rakison D.H. A secret agent? How infants learn about the identity of objects in a causal scene. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2005, 91:271-296.
35. Rips L.J. Similarity, typicality, and categorization. Similarity and analogical reasoning 1989, Cambridge University Press, New York. S. Vosniadou, A. Ortony (Eds.).
36. Samuelson L.K. Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38:1016-1037.
37. Samuelson L.K., Smith L.B. Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond?. Cognition 1999, 73:1-33.
38. Samuelson L.K., Smith L.B. Children's attention to rigid and deformable shape in naming and non-naming tasks. Child Development 2000, 71:1555-1570.
39. Samuelson L.K., Smith L.B. They call it like they see it: Spontaneous naming and attention to shape. Developmental Science 2005, 8:182-198.
40. Schulz L.E., Gopnik A. Causal learning across domains. Developmental Psychology 2004, 40:162-176.
41. Smith L.B. Children's noun learning: How general learning processes make specialized learning mechanisms. The emergence of language 1999, 277-303. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. B. MacWhinney (Ed.).
42. Smith L.B., Jones S.S., Landau B. Naming in young children: A dumb attentional mechanism?. Cognition 1996, 60:143-171.
43. Smith L.B., Jones S.S., Landau B., Gershkoff-Stowe L., Samuelson L. Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science 2002, 13:13-19.
44. Smith L.B., Samuelson L. An attentional learning account of the shape bias: Reply to Cimpian and Markman (2005) and Booth, Waxman, and Huang (2005). Developmental Psychology 2006, 42:1339-1343.
45. Sobel D.M., Kirkham N.Z. Blickets and babies: The development of causal reasoning in toddlers and infants. Developmental Psychology 2006, 42:1103-1115.
46. Soja N.N., Carey S., Spelke E.S. Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition 1991, 38:179-211.
47. Tomikawa S.A., Dodd D.H. Early word meanings: Perceptually or functionally based?. Child Development 1980, 51:1103-1109.
48. Träuble B., Pauen S. The role of functional information for infant categorization. Cognition 2007, 105:362-379.
49. Wang S., Kaufman L., Baillargeon R. Should all stationary objects move when hit? Developments in infants' causal and statistical expectations about collision events. Infant Behavior & Development 2003, 26:529-567.
50. Ward T.B., Becker A.H., Hass S.D., Vela E. Attribute availability and the shape bias in children's category generalization. Cognitive Development 1991, 6:143-167.
51. Wellman H.M., Gelman S.A. Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology 1992, 43:337-375.
52. Wilcox T., Chapa C. Priming infants to attend to color and pattern information in an individuation task. Cognition 2004, 90:265-302.