Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence

Science and Education

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1427-1445

  Vosniadou, Stella ^a   Skopeliti, Irini ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881108944     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-013-9640-3     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Baillargeon, R. (1995). A model of physical reasoning in infancy. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (vol. 9, pp. 305–371). USA: Ablex.
2. Brown, D., & Hammer, D. (2013). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The International handbook of conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 121–137). New York: Routledge.
3. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction,15, 1–40.
6. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129–186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). New York: Routledge.
8. Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The international handbook of conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 49–70). New York: Routledge.
9. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction,4, 27–43.
10. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research,63, 1–49.
11. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2001). Epistemologically authentic scientific reasoning. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 351–392). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic reasoning in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education,86, 175–218.
13. Clark, D. B., D’Angelo, C., & Schleigh, S. (2011). Comparison of students’ knowledge structure coherence and understanding of force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States. Journal of the Learning Sciences,20(2), 207–261.
14. Clark, D., & Linn, M. (2013). Promoting conceptual change through inquiry. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The international handbook of conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 520–538). New York: Routledge.
15. Clement, J. (2008). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The international handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 417–452). New York: Routledge.
16. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction,10(2/3), 105–225.
17. diSessa, A. A. (2008). A bird’s-eye view of the “pieces” vs. “coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35–60). New York: Routledge.
18. diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N., & Esterly, J. (2004). Coherence vs. fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science,28, 843–900.
19. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20. Gelman, R. (1991). Epigenetic foundations of knowledge structures: Initial and transcendent constructions. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 293–322). Erlabaum: Hilldale, NJ.
21. Guzzetti, B. J., & Glass, G. V. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly,28, 116–159.
22. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive-sociocultural view. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 407–427). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2003). Conceptual and linguistic factors in inductive projection: How do young children recognize commonalities between animals and plants? In D. Genter & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language and thought in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 313–333). Cambridge, ΜΑ: ΜΙΤ Press.
24. Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2002). The changing meanings of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly,2(1), 5–62.
25. Ioannidou, I., & Vosniadou, S. (2001). The development of knowledge about the composition and layering of the earth’s interior. Nea Paedia, 31, (in Greek), 107–150.
26. Jonassen, D. (2008). Model building for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 676–693). New York: Routledge.
27. Keil, F. C. (1981). Constraints on knowledge and cognitive development. Psychological Review,88, 197–227.
28. Kyriakopoulou, N., & Vosniadou, S. (2012). The Relation between conceptual change in physical science, theory of mind and personal epistemology and implication for science instruction. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on conceptual change. 1–4 September, Trier, Germany.
29. Kyriakopoulou, N. & Vosniadou, S. (this volume). Using theory of mind to promote conceptual change in science, science & education.
30. Kyrkos, C., & Vosniadou, S. (1997). Mental models of plant nutrition: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Poster presented at the Seventh European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.
31. Lehrer, R., Jones, S., Pfaff, E., & Shinohara, M. (2013). Modeling data: A learning progression for supporting the development of statistical reasoning. Paper presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Building Learning Progressions for Science and Math Learning, San Francisco, CA: Vanderbilt University.
32. Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A Critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction,11, 357–380.
33. Linn, M., & Eylon, B. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. New York: Routledge.
34. Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology,29, 103–128.
35. Mason, L., & Gava, M. (2007). Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 165–196). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
36. Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology,100(2), 291–309.
37. Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist,40(1), 27–52.
38. Nussbaum, J. (1979). Children’s conception of the earth as a cosmic body: A cross-age study. Science Education,63, 83–93.
39. Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J. D. (1976). An assessment of children’s concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews. Science Education,60, 535–550.
40. Ozdemir, G., & Clark, D. (2009). Knowledge structure coherence in Turkish students’ understanding of force. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46, 570–596.
41. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education,66, 211–227.
42. Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naïve physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction,18(1), 1–34.
43. Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education,13, 191–209.
44. Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1996). Mental models of the earth, sun, and moon: Indian children’s cosmologies. Cognitive Development,11, 491–521.
45. Schwarz, C.V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(6), 632–654.
46. Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,3, 115–163.
48. Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications for children’s learning for assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement,14(1&2), 1–98.
49. Sneider, C., & Pulos, S. (1983). Children’s cosmographies: Understanding the earth’s shape and gravity. Science Education,67, 205–221.
50. Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. In L. Verschaffel, S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Conceptual change in mathematics learning and teaching, Special Issue of Learning and instruction 14, 5, 503–518.
51. Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007a). Conceptual change in physics and physics-related epistemological beliefs: A relationship under scrutiny. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 145–163). New York: Elsevier.
52. Stathopoulou, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2007b). Exploring the relationship between physics-related epistemological beliefs and physics understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology,32, 255–281.
53. Vamvakoussi, Χ., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ reasoning about rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction,28(2), 181–209.
54. Van Hoof, J., Lijnen, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (in press). Are secondary school students still hampered by the natural number bias? A Reaction time study on fraction comparison tasks. Research in Mathematics Education.
55. Vosniadou, S. (2003). Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 377–406). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Vosniadou, S. (2013). Conceptual change in learning and instruction: The framework theory approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The international handbook of conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 11–30). New York: Routledge.
57. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology,24, 535–585.
58. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science,18, 123–183.
59. Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction,11, 381–419.
60. Vosniadou, S., & Mason, L. (2011). Conceptual change induced by instruction: A complex interplay of multiple factors. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 221–246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
61. Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2005). Developmental shifts in children’s categorization of the earth, In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2325–2330.
62. Vosniadou, S. & Skopeliti, I. (submitted). Children’s erroneous inferences in the comprehension of counter-intuitive science text. Learning and Instruction.
63. Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2004). Modes of knowing and ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy. Cognitive Development,19, 203–222.
64. Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2005). Reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: Children’s understanding of the globe as a model of the earth. Learning and Instruction,15, 333–351.
65. Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). New York: Routledge.
66. Vosniadou, S., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. In L. Verschaffel, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Conceptual change in mathematics learning and teaching.Special Issue of Learning and Instruction, 14(5), pp. 445–451.
67. Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology,43, 337–375.
69. Wiser, M., & Smith, C. L. (2008). Learning and teaching about matter in grades K-8: When should the atomic-molecular theory be introduced? In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The international handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 205–239). New York: Routledge.