Changes in participants' scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 773-801

  Price, C Aaron ^a   Lee, Hee Sun ^b  

^a Museum of Science and Industry   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

citizen science; informal science; nature of science (NOS); science literacy

Indexed keywords

CITIZEN SCIENCE; EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS; INFORMAL SCIENCE; NATURE OF SCIENCE; SCIENCE LITERACY; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES; SOCIAL COMPONENTS;

EDUCATION; RESEARCH;

TECHNICAL WRITING;

EID: 84881107073     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21090     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Aikenhead, G. S., (2005). Research into STS science education. Educaciõn Química, 16, 384-397.
3. Anderson, D., (2003). Public computing: Reconnecting people to science. Presented at the Conference on Shared Knowledge and the Web, Residencia de Estudiantes, Madrid, Spain, November 17-19, 2003.
4. Andrich, D., (1978). Scaling attitude items constructed and scored in the Likert tradition. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 665-680.
5. Bacher, K., (2011, March 31). Volunteer program highlight: Citizen science [Web log post]. Retrieved from: http://rainiervolunteers.blogspot.com/ 2011/03/volunteer-program-highlight-citizen.html
6. Bloom, M. A., (2008). The effect of a professional development intervention on inservice science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Christian University, Ft. Worth.
7. Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Networked Computing. (2009). Bossa. Retrieved from: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/BossaIntro (Accessed December 9, 2009).
8. Bond, T. G., &, Fox, C. M., (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J.,., Wilderman, C. C., (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science. Education (CAISE).
10. Boone, W. J., &, Scantlebury, K., (2005). Rasch analysis in science education research. Science Education, 2, 253-269.
11. Brandt, C., Shirk, J., Jordan, R., Ballard, H. L., &, Tomasek, T. M., (2010, March). Beyond citizen science: Science learning and public participation in environmental research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
12. Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., &, Bonney, R., (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1099-1121.
13. Cardamore, C., Schawinski, K., Sarzi, M., Bamford, S. P., Bennert, N., Urry, C. M.,., Vandenberg, J., (2009). Galaxy zoo green peas: Discovery of a class of compact extremely star-forming galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 399, 1191-1205.
14. Carifio, J., &, Perla, R., (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42, 1150-1152.
15. Christian, C., Lintott, C., Smith, A., Fortson, L., &, Bamford, S., (2012). Citizen science: Contributions to astronomy research. Retrieved from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2577 (Accessed April 4, 2012).
16. Cifelli, R., (2005). The community collaborative rain, hail, and snow network: Informal education for scientists and citizens. Bulletin of the American Meteorology Society, 86, 1069-1078.
17. Center for Informal Learning and Schools. (2005). ISIs and schools: A landscape study. Retrieved from: http://www.exploratorium.edu/cils/landscape (Accessed August 14, 2009).
18. Cohn, J. P., (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research ? Bioscience, 58, 192-197.
19. Cornell Ornithology Lab. (2009). Defining citizen science. Retrieved from: http://www.birds.cornell.edu/citscitoolkit/about/definition (Accessed August 14, 2009).
20. Conrad, C. C., &, Hilchey, K. G., (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 176, 273.
21. Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., &, Bonney, R., (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12, 11 [online] Retrieved from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol12/iss2/art11/
22. Cornwall, A., &, Jewkes, R., (1995). What is participatory research ? Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1667-1676.
23. Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Im, S., &, Ma, J., (2007). Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14, 1-27.
24. Cummings, J. N., &, Kiesler, S., (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35, 703-722.
25. Curren, D., (2013). The levels of citizen science involvement-Part 1. Retrieved from: http://www.openscientist.org/2013/01/the-levels-of-citizen- science.html (Accessed January 14, 2013).
26. Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., &, Ellenbogen, K., (2003). Policy statement of the "informal science education" ad hoc committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 108-111.
27. Doering, A., Miller, C., &, Veletsianos, G., (2008). Adventure learning: Educational, social, and technological affordances for collaborative hybrid distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9, 249-266.
28. Ely, E., (2008). Volunteer monitoring & the democratization of science. The Volunteer Monitor, 19, 1.
29. Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L., &, Marra, P. P., (2005). The neighborhood nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19, 589-594.
30. Falk, J. H., &, Dierking, L. D., (2010). The 95 percent solution. American Scientist, 98, 486-493.
31. Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., &, Dierking, L. D., (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 455-469.
32. Ferris, T., (2002). Seeing in the dark. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
33. Fore, L. S., Paulsen, K., &, O'Laughlin, K., (2001). Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biology, 46, 109-123.
34. Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M., &, Pilot, A., (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 817-837.
35. GLOBE. (2011). Annual Review, 2010. Retrieved from: http://globe.gov/ news/articles/2010-globe-annual-review (Accessed May 16, 2012).
36. Greaves, S., (2012). Citizen science musings: The indispensable mentor. Retrieved from: http://citizenscientistsleague.com/2012/04/16/citizen-science- musings-the-indispensable-mentor/ (Accessed April 16, 2012).
37. Hand, E., (2010). Citizen science: People power. Nature, 66, 685-687.
38. Holbrook, J., &, Rannikmäe, M., (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347-1362.
39. Hollow, R., (2010). Using authentic astronomical data in investigations and activities. Retrieved from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation web site: http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/teachers/ resources/
40. Howard, E., &, Davis, A. K., (2004). Documenting the spring movements of monarch butterflies with journey north, a citizen science program. In, K. S. Oberhauser, &, M. J. Solensky, (Eds.), The Monarch butterfly: Biology & conservation. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
41. Howe, J., (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired. Retrieved from: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html (Accessed March 17, 2010).
42. Jamieson, S., (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212-1218.
43. Jordan, R. C., Ballard, H. L., &, Phillips, T. B., (2012). Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 307-309.
44. Karrow, D., &, Fazio, X., (2010). Education-within-place: Care, citizen science, and ecojustice. In:, D. J. Tippins, M. P. Mueller, J. D. Adams, &, M. Van Eijck, (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism. (pp. 193-214). New York, NY: Springer.
45. Khare, D., Zevit, P., &, Shirk, J., (2012a). Citizen science community forum. Retrieved from: http://www.citizenscience.org/community/about- forum/ (Accessed May 1, 2012).
46. Khare, D., Zevit, P., &, Shirk, J., (2012b). Citizen science and informal science education institutions Retrieved from: http://www. citizenscience.org/community/blog/2011/10/25/informal-science-institutions/ (Accessed May 1, 2012).
47. Knapp, T. R., (1990). Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: An attempt to resolve the controversy. Nursing Research, 39, 121-123.
48. Kolb, D. A., (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
49. Lakshminarayanan, S., (2007). Using citizens to do science versus citizens as scientists. Ecology and Society, 12, 2. Retrieved from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/resp2/ (Accessed December 7, 2009).
50. Linacre, J. M., (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85-106.
51. Linacre, J. M., (2010). Winsteps and Facets Rasch Analysis Software. Retrieved from: http://www.winsteps.com (Accessed June 1, 2010).
52. M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, &, P. Bell, (Eds.), (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Meichtry, Y. J., (1994). The impact of science curricula on student views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 429-443.
54. Miller, J. D., (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus 112, 29-48.
55. Miller, J. D., (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 203-223.
56. Miller, J. D., (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273-294.
57. Mueller, M., Tippins, D., &, Bryan, L., (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20, 1-12.
58. Muraki, E., (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59-70.
59. Nov, O., Arazy, O., &, Anderson, D., (2011a, February). Dusting for science: Motivation and participation of digital citizen science volunteers. Paper presented at iConference 2011, Seattle, Washington.
60. Nov, O., Arazy, O., &, Anderson, D., (2011b). Technology-mediated citizen science participation: A motivational model. In, N. Nicolov, &, J. G. Shanahan, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 249-256). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
61. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
62. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
63. National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: (NSB 08-01; NSB 08-01A). Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/ statistics/seind08/ (Accessed December 7, 2009).
64. National Science Foundation and Lifelong Learning. (2010, October 5). Retrieved from: http://caise.insci.org/uploads/docs/FINAL-NSF- ISE%20ASTC%202010%20%2810%205%2010%29v2.pdf (Accessed April 17, 2012).
65. New Track Media. (2010). Reader demographics, rate card #51. Retrieved from: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/about/advertiserinfo/3305436.html?page= 1&c=y (Accessed January 25, 2010).
66. Ottinger, G., (2010). Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35, 244-270.
67. Ozgelen, S., (2012). Exploring the relationships among epistemological beliefs, metacognitive awareness and nature of science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7, 409-431.
68. Penuel, W. R., &, Means, B., (2004). Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: Analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 294-315.
69. Percy, J., (1999). Amateur-professional partnership in astronomical research and education. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 111, 1595-1596.
70. Percy, J. R., (Ed.) (2012). Highlighting Epsilon Aurigae and Citizen Sky. Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers, 40, 609-611.
71. Phillips, A. L., (2008). Of sunflowers and citizens. American Scientist, 96, 375-376.
72. Price, A., &, Paxson, K. B., (2011). The AAVSO 2011 Demographic and Background Survey. Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers, 40.
73. Price, C. A., Borland, J., &, Lee, H-S., (March, 2012). Scientific competencies and learning in online discourse of a citizen science project. Unpublished paper presented at National Association of Research in Science Teaching 2012 Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
74. Raddick, M. J., Bracy, G., Carney, K., Gyuk, G., Borne, K.,., Jacoby D., (2009). Citizen science: Status and research directions for the coming decade. Retrieved from: http://www8.nationalacademies.org/astro2010/DetailFileDisplay. aspx?id=454 (Accessed December 7, 2009).
75. Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, C. J., Murray, P.,., Vandenberg, J., (2010). Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review, 9, 1-18.
76. Rasch, G., (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and achievement tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
77. Roth, W.-M., &, Barton, A. C., (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
78. Roth, W. M., &, Lee, S., (2005). Rethinking scientific literacy: From science education as propaedeutic to participation in the community. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478153).
79. Roy, H. E., Pocock, M. J. O., Preston, C. D., Roy, D. B., &, Savage, J., (2012). Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. Retrieved from NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology web site: http://www.ceh.ac.uk/products/publications/documents/CitizenScienceReview.pdf
80. Rubba, P. A., &, Andersen, H. O., (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62, 449-458.
81. Sadler, T. D., &, Zeidler, D. L., (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 909-921.
82. Shen, B. S., (1975). Views: Science literacy: Public understanding of science is becoming vitally needed in developing and industrialized countries alike. American Scientist, 63, 265-268.
83. Silvertown, J., (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 467-471.
84. Somers, A. B., Matthews, C. E., &, Carlone, H., (2009). The turtle connection. N. C. Partners in Amphibian & Reptile Conservation. Retrieved from: http://www.ncparc.org/TurtleConnectionSummary.pdf (Accessed December 7, 2009).
85. Time Out Chicago. (2012). Citizen Science Sunday. Retrieved from: http://timeoutchicago.com/things-to-do/this-week-in-chicago/15251541/ citizen-science-sunday (Accessed May 1, 2012).
86. Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., Bascom, D., &, Cabral, A., (2000). Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84, 265-275.
87. Ucko, D. A., (2010). NSF influence on the field of informal science education. Retrieved from: http://caise.insci.org/uploads/docs/Ucko- %20NSFInfluenceonISE.pdf (Accessed April 23, 2012).
88. Vygotsky, L. S., (1964). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Wee, Y. C., &, Subaraj, R., (2009). Citizen science and the gathering of ornithological data in Singapore. Nature in Singapore, 2, 27-30.
90. Wiggins, A., &, Crowston K., (2011). From conservation to crowd sourcing: A typology of citizen science. Proceedings of the Forty-fourth Hawai'i International Conference on System Science. Retrieved from: http://voss.syr.edu/sites/voss.syr.edu/files/hicss-44.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2011).
91. Wilderman, C. C., (2004). Portrait of a watershed: Shermans Creek. A technical status report. 73 pp.
92. Wright, A., (2010). Managing scientific inquiry in a laboratory the size of the web. New York Times, December 27, 2010.
93. Wright, B. D., &, Lincare, J. M., (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
94. Wright, B. D., &, Masters, G. N., (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press/University of Chicago.