Self and external monitoring of reading comprehension

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 78-88

  Shiu, Ling po ^a   Chen, Qishan ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Delayed keyword effects; Reading comprehension; Self monitoring; Self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880978728     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0029378     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Toward tutoring help seeking. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari, & F. Parguacu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 227-239). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
2. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
3. Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110-118. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.10.006
4. Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Ingredients for a theory of instruction. American Psychologist, 27, 921-931. doi:10.1037/h0033572
5. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
6. Azevedo, R., Witherspoon, A., Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D., Chauncey, A., Siler, E.,... Lintean, M. (2009). MetaTutor: Analyzing selfregulated learning in a tutoring system for biology. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. du Boulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 635-637). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press.
7. Begg, I. M., Martin, L. A., & Needham, D. R. (1992). Memory monitoring: How useful is self-knowledge about memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 195-218. doi:10.1080/09541449208406182
8. Bol, L., & Hacker, D. J. (2001). A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 133-151. doi:10.1080/00220970109600653
9. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control. Instructional Science, 34, 399-422.
10. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 733-756. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.003
11. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x
12. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & McDonald, S. L. (2002). Influence of practice tests on the accuracy of predicting memory performance for paired associates, sentences, and text material. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 68-92). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489976.005
13. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 702-718. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.702
14. Graesser, A., & McNamara, D. (2010). Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language. Educational Psychologist, 45, 234-244. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.515933
15. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334-372. doi:10.3102/003465430303953
16. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160-170. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160
17. Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23-52. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323
18. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471-479. doi:10.1080/09658210802647009
19. Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239-264. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0
20. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609
21. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
22. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187-194. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187
23. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test. Memory & Cognition, 34, 959-972. doi: 10.3758/BF03193244
24. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of selfregulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219-224. doi: 10.3758/BF03194055
25. Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Self-assessment and task selection in learner-controlled instruction: Differences between effective and ineffective learners. Computers & Education, 54, 932-940. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.025
26. Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121-132. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
27. Leonesio, R. J., & Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 464-470. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.464
28. Lin, L. M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345-391. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0972
29. Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 756-766. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.756
30. Magliano, J. P., Little, L. D., & Graesser, A. C. (1993). The impact of comprehension instruction on the calibration of comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 49-63. doi:10.1080/19388079309558124
31. Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: Delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959-964. doi:10.3758/BF03201176
32. Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349-363. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.349
33. Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 159-163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
34. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 530-542. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530
35. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109
36. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: "The delayed JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x
37. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207-213. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x
38. Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9, 53-69. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.53
39. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 7-28.
40. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 159-179. doi: 10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6
41. Pavlik, P. I., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 101-117. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.101
42. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
43. Rawson, K., Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2000). The rereading effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1004-1010.
44. Rawson, K. A., O'Neil, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 288-302. doi:10.1037/a0024749
45. Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students' help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21, 267-280. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.004
46. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York, NY: Merrill/Macmillan.
47. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129-160. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00011-5
48. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66
49. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of selfregulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and selfpaced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024
50. Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267-1280. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1267
51. Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Redford, J. S. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 85-106). New York, NY: Routledge.
52. Thomas, A. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). Metacomprehension for educationally relevant materials: Dramatic effects of encoding-retrieval interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 212-218. doi:10.3758/BF03194054
53. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01281.x
54. Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 957-982). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
55. Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2009). Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 259-277). New York, NY: Routledge.
56. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73-86.