Neuroscience findings on coordination of reaching to grasp an object: Implications for research

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 622-635

  Van Vliet, Paulette ^a   Pelton, Trudy A ^b   Hollands, Kristen Leigh ^c   Carey, Leeanne ^d   Wing, Alan Miles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

coordination; motor control; rehabilitation; stroke; upper limb

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; CEREBELLUM INJURY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DECELERATION; DOUBLE DISSOCIATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; KINEMATICS; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVOUS TISSUE; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSCIENCE; PARIETAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; STROKE PATIENT; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

EID: 84880966232     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968313483578     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Lum PS, Mulroy S, Amdur RL, Requjo P, Prilutsky BI, Dromerick AW. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 ; 16: 237-253
2. Nowak DA. The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008 ; 32: 1439-1450
3. Nagasaki H. Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements. Exp Brain Res. 1989 ; 74: 319-326
4. Ansuini C, Santello M, Massaccesi S, Castiello U. Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. J Neurophysiol. 2006 ; 95: 2456-2465
5. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci. 1994 ; 17: 187-245
6. Sangole AP, Levin MF. Arches of the hand in reach to grasp. J Biomech. 2008 ; 41: 829-837
7. van Vliet PM, Sheridan MR. Coordination between reaching and grasping in patients with hemiparesis and normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88: 1325-1331
8. Paulignan Y, Toni VG, Jeannerod M. Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res. 1997 ; 114: 226-234
9. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav. 1986 ; 18: 245-260
10. Saling M, Alberts J, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR. Reach-to-grasp movements during obstacle avoidance. Exp Brain Res. 1998 ; 118: 251-258
11. Haggard P, Wing AM. Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension. Neurosci Lett. 1991 ; 122: 103-108
12. Wang J, Stelmach GE. Coordination among the body segments during reach-to-grasp action involving the trunk. Exp Brain Res. 1998 ; 123: 346-350
13. Hoff B, Arbib MA. Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp. J Mot Behav. 1993 ; 25: 175-192
14. Rand MK, Squire LM, Stelmach GE. Effect of speed manipulation on the control of aperture closure during reach to grasp movements. Exp Brain Res. 2006 ; 174: 74-85
15. Gentilucci M, Chiefi S, Scarpa M, Castiello U. Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation. Behav Brain Res. 1992 ; 47: 71-82
16. Zaal FTJM, Bootsma RJ, Wieringen PCWV. Coordination in prehension. Information based coupling of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res. 1998 ; 119: 427-435
17. Alberts JL, Saling M, Stelmach GE. Alterations in transport path differentially affect temporal and spatial movement parameters. Exp Brain Res. 2002 ; 143: 417-425
18. Smeets JBJ, Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Motor Control. 1999 ; 3: 237-271
19. Biegstraaten M, Smeets JB, Brenner E. The influence of obstacles on the speed of grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2003 ; 149: 530-534
20. Santello M, Soechting JF. Matching object size by controlling finger span and hand shape. Somatosens Mot Res. 1997 ; 14: 203-212
21. Pilon J-F, Serres SJD, Feldman AG. Threshold position control of arm movement with anticiptory increase in grip force. Exp Brain Res. 2007 ; 181: 49-67
22. vanBergen E, vanSwieten LM, Williams JHG, Mon-Williams M. The effect of orientation on prehension movement time. Exp Brain Res. 2007 ; 178: 180-193
23. Gentilucci M, Toni I, Chieffi S, Pavasi G. The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects. Exp Brain Res. 1994 ; 99: 483-500
24. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci. 1999 ; 2: 563-567
25. Messier J, Kalaska JF. Covariation of primate dorsal premotor cell activity with direction and amplitude during a memorized-delay reaching task. J Neurophysiol. 2000 ; 84: 152-165
26. Fattori P, Breveglieri R, Marzocchi N, Filippini D, Bosco A, Galleti C. Hand orientation during reach-to-grasp movements modulates neuronal activity in the medial posterior parietal area V6. J Neurosci. 2009 ; 29: 1928-1936
27. Kantak SS, Stinear JW, Buch ER, Cohen LG. Rewiring the brain: potential role of the premotor cortex in motor control, learning, and recovery of function following brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 ; 26: 282-292
28. Binkofsky F, Dohle C, Posse S, et al. Human anterior intrapareital area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional magnetic resonance imaging activation study. Neurology. 1998 ; 50: 1253-1259
29. Mackay WA, Riehle A Tutorials in Motor Behaviour II. Stelmach G Requin J, ed. New York, NY: Elsevier ; 1992: 501-514.
30. Tunik E, Frey SH, Grafton S. Virtual lesions of anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci. 2005 ; 8: 505-511
31. Batista AP, Andersen RA. The parietal reach region codes the next planned movement in a sequential task. J Neurophysiol. 2001 ; 85: 539-544
32. Miall RC, Wolpert DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 1996 ; 9: 1265-1279
33. Jakobson LS, Archibald Y, Carey D, Goodale MA. A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia. 1991 ; 29: 803-809
34. Wolpert DM, Goodbody SJ, Husain M. Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci. 1998 ; 1: 529-533
35. Ebner TJ, Pasalar S. Cerebellum predicts the future motor state. Cerebellum. 2008 ; 7: 583-588
36. Gibson AR, Horn KM, Pong M, Kan PLV. Construction of a reach-to-grasp. Novartis Foundation Symposium. 1998 ;: 233-245
37. Thielmann GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resisted exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 1613-1618
38. van Vliet PM. An investigation of the task specificity of reaching: implications for re-training. Physiother Theory Pract. 1993 ; 9: 69-76
39. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, et al. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2005 ; 166: 126-136
40. Nowak A, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, Kust J, Karbe H, Fink GR. Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 ; 25: 3173-3184
41. van Vliet P, Kerwin DG, Sheridan MR, Fentem PH. The influence of functional goals on the kinematics of reaching following stroke. Neurol Rep. 1995 ; 19: 11-16
42. van Vliet PM, Sheridan MR. Ability to adjust reach extent in the hemiplegic arm. Physiotherapy. 2009 ; 95: 176-184
43. Flash T, Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci. 1985 ; 7: 1688-1701
44. Uno Y, Kawato M, Suzuki R. Formation and control of optimum trajectory in human multi-joint arm movement: minimum torque-change model. Biol Cybern. 1989 ; 61: 89-101
45. Harris CM, Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature. 1998 ; 394: 780-784
46. Michaelsen SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004 ; 157: 162-173
47. Wu CY, Chou SH, Kuo MY, Chen CL, Lu TW, Fu YC. Effects of object size on intralimb and interlimb coordination during a bimanual prehension task in patients with left cerebral vascular accidents. Motor Control. 2008 ; 12: 296-310
48. Koesler IB. Electrical somatosensory stimulation improves movement kinematics of the affected hand following stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 ; 80: 614-619
49. Tan C, Tretriluxana J, Pitsch E, Runnarong N, Winstein CJ. Anticipatory planning of functional reach-to-grasp. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 ; 26: 957-967
50. Qui Q, Fluet GG, Lafond I, Merians AS, Adamovich SV. Coordination changes demonstrated by subjects with hemiparesis performing hand-arm training using the NJIT-RAVR robotically assisted virtual rehabilitation system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009 ; 2009: 1143-1146
51. Merians AS, Poizner H, Bolan R, Burdea G, Adamovich S. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: does it improve functional recovery poststroke?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20: 252-267
52. Roy AC, Stefanini S, Pavesi G, Gentilucci M. Early movement impairments in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia. 2004 ; 42: 847-854
53. Rand MK, Shimansky Y, Stelmach GE. Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients. Exp Brain Res. 2000 ; 135: 179-188
54. Topka H, Konczak J, Schneider K, Boose A, Dichgans J. Multijoint arm movements in cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of movement dynamics. Exp Brain Res. 1998 ; 119: 493-503
55. Fisher BE, Boyd L, Winstein CJ. Contralateral cerebellar damage impairs imperative planning but not updating of aimed arm movements. Exp Brain Res. 2006 ; 174: 453-466
56. Immisch I, Qintern J, Straube A. Unilateral cerebellar lesions influence arm movements bilaterally. Neuroreport. 2003 ; 14: 837-840
57. Zackowski KM, Thach WT, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar subjects show impaired coupling of reach and grasp movements. Exp Brain Res. 2002 ; 146: 511-522
58. Timman D, Watts S, Hore J. Failure of cerebellar patients to time finger opening precisely causes ball high-low inaccuracy in overarm throws. J Neurophysiol. 1999 ; 2: 103-114
59. Shimansky Y, Saling M, Wunderlich DA, Bracha V, Stelmavh GE, Bloedel JR. Impaired capacity of cerebellar patients to perceive and learn two-dimensional shapes based on kinesthetic cues. Learn Mem. 1997 ; 4: 36-48
60. Wenzelburger R, Kopper F, Frenzel A, et al. Hand coordination following capsular stroke. Brain. 2005 ; 128: 64-74
61. Pelton T, Hollands K, van Vliet PM. Interventions for improving coordination of reach and grasp following stroke: systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012 ; 10: 89-102
62. Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008 ; 23: 81-87
63. Binkofsky F, Dohle C, Posse S, et al. Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional magnetic resonance imaging activation study. Neurology. 1998 ; 50: 1253-1259
64. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007 ; 130: 170-180
65. Carey LM Stroke Rehabilitation: Insights From Neuroscience and Imaging. Carey LM, ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press ; 2012: 240-248.
66. Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Betzler F, Alsop D, Schlaug G. Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predcits motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology. 2010 ; 74: 280-287
67. Whitall J, Waller SM, Sorkin JD, et al. Bilateral and unilateral arm training improve motor function through differing neuroplastic mechanisms: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 ; 25: 118-129
68. Riley JD, Le V, Der-Yeghiaian L, et al. Anatomy of stroke injury predicts gains from therapy. Stroke. 2011 ; 42: 421-426
69. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Harvey MR, Puce A, Seitz RJ, Donnan GA. The relationship between touch impairment and brain activation after lesions of subcortical and cortical somatosensory regions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 ; 25: 443-457
70. Pannek L, Mathias JL, Bigler ED, Brown G, Taylor JD, Rose SE. The average pathlength map: a diffusion MRI tractography-derived index for studying the brain pathology. Neuroimage. 2011 ; 55: 133-141
71. Newton JM, Ward NS, Parker GJ, et al. Non-invasive mapping of corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas: relevance to stroke recovery. Brain. 2006 ; 129 (pt 7). 1844-1858
72. Lin K. C., Wu C. Y., et al. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2007 ; 21 (12). 1075-1086
73. Qiu Q., Fluet G. G., et al. Coordination changes demonstrated by subjects with hemiparesis performing hand-arm training using the NJIT-RAVR robotically assisted virtual rehabilitation system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009 ; 2009: 1143-1146