Interventions for improving coordination of reach to grasp following stroke: A systematic review

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 89-102

  Pelton, Trudy ^a   van Vliet, Paulette ^c   Hollands, Kristen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Neurology; Physiotherapy; Rehabilitation; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CONVALESCENCE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866790392     PISSN: 17441595     EISSN: 17441609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00261.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Hoff B, Arbib MA. Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp. J Motor Beh 1993; 25: 175-92.
2. Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RGJ, Vaughan J, Jansen C. Coordination of reaching and grasping by capitalizing on obstacle avoidance and other constraints. Exp Brain Res 1999; 128: 92-100.
3. Jeannerod M. Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In: Long J, Baddley A, eds. Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981; 153-69.
4. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J Motor Beh 1984; 26: 235-54.
5. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ et al. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2005; 166: 126-36.
6. VanVliet PM, Sheridan MR. Coordination between reaching and grasping in patients with hemiparesis and normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1325-31.
7. Cunningham CL, Stoykov MEP, Walter CB. Bilateral facilitation of motor control in chronic hemiplegia. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2002; 110: 321-37.
8. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Jun 2003;84(6):915-920. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 68: 763-71.
9. Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, Mark VW, Uswatte G. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Stroke 2005; 36: 1301-04.
10. Whitall J, Waller SM, Silver KHC, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2390-95.
11. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P et al. Efficacy of modified constraintinduced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 14-8.
12. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 2001; 32: 1279-84.
13. vanderLee JH, Snels IA, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Wagenaar RC, Bouter LM. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 20-31.
14. Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17: 220-26.
15. Coote S, Stokes EK. Physiotherapy for upper extremity dysfunction following stroke. Phys Ther Rev 2001; 6: 63-9.
16. Hiraoke K. Rehabilitation effort to improve upper extremity function in post-stroke patients: a meta-analysis. J Phys Ther Sci 2001; 13: 5-9.
17. Diedrichsen J, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R. Dissociating timing and coordination as functions of the cerebellum. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 6291-301.
18. Fugl-Meyer AR et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
19. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 377-84.
20. Pelton T, Hollands K, VanVliet PM. Interventions for improving coordination of reach and grasp following stroke: systematic review. Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Rev 2011; 9: 1352-95.
21. Lin KC, Wu CY, Wei TH, Lee CY, Liu JS. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study [with consumer summary]. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 1075-86.
22. Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. Neuro-Rehabilitation 2008; 23: 81-7.
23. Coupar F, Legg L, Pollock A, Sackley C, van Vliet P. Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4). Art. No.: CD006755. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006755.
24. Lum PS, Mulroy S, Amdur RL, Requejo P, Prilutsky BI, Dromerick AW. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16: 237-53.
25. Merians AS et al. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: does it improve functional recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 252-67.
26. Koesler IB, Dafotakis M, Ameli M, Fink GR, Nowak DA. Electrical somatosensory stimulation improves movement kinematics of the affected hand following stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 614-19.
27. Qiu Q, Fluet GG, Lafond I, Merians AS, Adamovich SV. Coordination changes demonstrated by subjects with hemiparesis performing hand-arm training using the NJIT-RAVR robotically assisted virtual rehabilitation system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; 2009: 1143-6.
28. Wolf S, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 1635-39.
29. Lyle R. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4: 4483-492.
30. Duncan P et al. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 950-63.
31. Lincoln NB, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 48-51.
32. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Modification of Rankin Scale: recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1988; 19: 1497-500.
33. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 311-19.
34. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Wever K. Adult norms for the Box and Block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 39: 386-91.
35. Wade D. Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke. Int Disabil Stud 1989; 11: 89-92.
36. Brott T et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-70.
37. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-54.
38. Brunstromm S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1970.
39. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987; 2: 206-07.
40. Taub E et al. Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log [Manual]. Birmingham, AL: UAB, CH415, 2000.
41. Nowak A, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, Kust J, Karbe H, Fink GR. Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur J Neurosci 2007; 25: 3173-84.
42. Castiello U, Bennett KMB, Stelmach GE. Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size. Exp Brain Res 1993; 94: 163-78.
43. Woodbury ML, Howland DR, McGuirk TE et al. Effects of trunk restraint combined with intensive task practice on poststroke upper extremity reach and function: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 78-91.
44. Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res 2003; 151: 289-300.
45. Caimmi M et al. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraintinduced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 31-9.
46. Slavin RE. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 9-18.
47. Winstein CJ, Merians AS, Sullivan KJ. Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 975-87.
48. Sangole AP, Levin MF. Palmar arch modulation in patients with hemiparesis after a stroke. J Biomech 2009; 41: 829-37.
49. Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke 2006; 37: 186-92.
50. Wu CY, Lin KC, Chen HC, Chen IH, Hong WH. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on movement kinematics and daily function in patients with stroke: a kinematic study of motor control mechanisms. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 460-66.
51. Binkofsky F, Dohle C, Posse S et al. Human anterior intrapareital area subserves prehension. A combined lesion and functional magnetic resonance imaging activation study. Neurology 1998; 50: 1253-59.
52. Jakobson LS, Archibald Y, Carey D, Goodale MA. A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia 1991; 29: 803-09.
53. Zackowski KM, W T Thach J, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar subjects show impaired coupling of reach and grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 2002; 146: 511-22.
54. Krakauer JW. Arm function after stroke: from physiology to recovery. Semin Neurol 2005; 25: 384-95.