Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 986-1003

  Trainor, Audrey ^a   Bouchard, Kate Ahlgren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

ethics; participant involvement; reciprocity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880935037     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2012.724467     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Charmaz, K. 2003. " Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods ". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 249-291. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Christians, C.G. 2003. " Ethics and politics in qualitative research ". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research: The landscape of qualitative research, 2nd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 139-164. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Denzin, N.K. 2005. " Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation ". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 933-958. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Eder, D. and Fingerson, L. 2002. " Interviewing children and adolescents ". In Handbook of interview research: Context and method, Edited by: Gubrium, J.F. and Holstein, J.A. 181-201. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Edwards, A., Sebba, J. and Rickinson, M. 2007. Working with users: Some implications for educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33 (5): 647-661.
6. Erwin, E.J. and Soodak, L.C. 1995. I never knew I could stand up to the system: Families' perspectives on pursuing inclusive education. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20 (2): 136-146.
7. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S. and Wong, L. 2003. " For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities ". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 107-131. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Fisher, C.B., Hoagwood, K., Boyce, C., Duster, T., Frank, D.A., Grisso, T. Levine, R.J. 2002. Research ethics for mental health science involving ethnic minority children and youths. American Psychologist, 57 (12): 1024-1040.
9. Freeman, M., deMarrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K. and St. Pierre, E. 2007. Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36 (1): 25-32.
10. Gluck, S.B. and Patai, D. 1991. Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history, New York, NY: Routledge.
11. Hess, R.S., Molina, A.M. and Kozleski, E.B. 2006. Until somebody hears me: Parent voice and advocacy in special educational decision making. British Journal of Special Education, 33 (3): 148-157.
12. Hill Collins, P. 1990. Toward an Afrocentric feminist epistemology. In Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment, 201-20. New York, NY: Routledge.
13. Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. 2005. " Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere ". In Handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 887-907. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Ladson-Billings, G. and Tate, W.F. 2006. Education research in the public interest, New York, NY: Teachers College.
15. Lather, P.A. 1991. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Lather, P. 2004. Scientific research in education: A critical perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 30 (6): 760-773.
17. Lather, P. 2006. Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19 (1): 35-57.
18. Lather, P. and Smithies, C. 1997. Troubling the angels, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19. LeCompte, M.D. and Schensul, J.J. 1999. Analyzing & interpreting ethnographic data, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
20. Lincoln, Y.S. 1995. Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1 (3): 275-289.
21. Lincoln, Y.S. and Denzin, N.K. 2000. " The seventh moment: Out of the past ". In Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1047-65. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Luke, C. and Gore, J. 1992. Feminisms and critical pedagogy, New York, NY: Routledge.
23. Madriz, E. 2003. " Focus groups in feminist research ". In Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 2nd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 835-50. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Mastropieri, M.A., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K.A., Graff, H., Marshak, L., Conners, N.A. Diamond, C.M. 2009. What is published in the field of special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 76 (1): 95-109.
25. Mercer, J. 2007. The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33 (1): 1-17.
26. Merriam, S.B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M.-Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G. and Muhamad, M. 2001. Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20 (5): 405-416.
27. Moss, P.A. 2005. Toward "epistemic reflexivity" in educational research: A response to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107 (1): 19-29.
28. Odom, S.L., E. Brantlinger, R. Gersten, R.D. Horner, B. Thompson, and K. Harris. 2004. Quality indicators for research in special education and guidelines for evidence-based practices: Executive summary, 1-12. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children Division for Research.
29. Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R.H., Thompson, B. and Harris, K. 2005. Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71 (2): 137-148.
30. Reinharz, S., with L. Davidman. 1992. Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Scheurich, J.J. 1997. Research method in the postmodern, London: Falmer Press.
32. Smith, J.K. and Deemer, D.K. 2000. " The problem of criteria in the age of relativism ". In The Sage handbook of qualitative research: The landscape of qualitative research, 2nd ed., Edited by: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 877-896. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Subedi, B. 2006. Theorizing a "halfie" researcher's identity in transnational fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19 (5): 573-593. doi: 10.1080/09518390600886353
34. Toma, J.D. 2006. " Approaching rigor in applied qualitative research ". In The Sage handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry, Edited by: Conrad, C.F. and Serlin, R.C. 405-423. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Trainor, A.A. 2010a. Diverse approaches to parent advocacy during special education home-school interactions: Identification and use of cultural and social capital. Remedial and Special Education, 31 (1): 34-47.
36. Trainor, A.A. 2010b. Educators' expectations of parent participation: The role of cultural and social capital. Multiple Voices, 12 (2): 33-50.
37. Trainor, A.A. 2010c. Reexamining the promise of parent participation in special education: An analysis of cultural and social capital. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41 (3): 245-63.
38. Witherell, C. and Noddings, N. 1991. Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39. Zigo, D. 2001. Rethinking reciprocity: Collaboration in labor as a path toward equalizing power in classroom research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14 (3): 351-365.