Rethinking reciprocity: Collaboration in labor as a path toward equalizing power in classroom research

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 351-365

  Zigo, Diane ^a  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008819717     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390110029094     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen, J. & Shockley, B. (1996). Composing a research dialogue: University and school research communities encountering a cultural shift. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 220-228.
2. Athanases, S. Z. (1993). Discourse about literature and diversity: A study of two urban tenth-grade classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. (University Microfilms No. 93-26, 420)
3. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
4. Ayers, W. & Schubert, W. (1992). Do the right thing: Ethical issues and problems in the conduct of qualitative research in the classroom. Teaching and Learning, 6, 19-24.
5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
6. Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvelle, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 241-256). New York: Springer Verlag.
7. Cunningham, J. W. & Fitzgerald, J. (1996). Epistemology and reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 36-60.
8. Dale, H. (1996). Dilemmas of ® delity: Qualitative research in the classroom. In G. E. Kirsch & P. Mortensen (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies in literacy (pp. 77-94). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
9. Ely, M. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London: Falmer Press.
10. Erickson, F. (1982). Taught cognitive learning in its immediate environments: A neglected topic in the anthropology of education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 13, 149-180.
11. Facio, E. (1993). Ethnography as personal experience. InJ. H. Stanfield II & R. M. Dennis (Eds.), Rase and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 75-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Flinders, D.J. (1992). Insearch of ethical guidance: Constructinga basis for dialogue. International Journalof Qualitative Studies in Education, 5, 101-115.
13. Francis, D. (1996). Moving from noninterventionist research to participatory research: Challenges for academe. International Journal of Qualitative Sudies in Education, 9, 75-86.
14. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
15. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, lfe, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hubbard, R. S. & Power, B. M. (1993). The art of class-room inquiry: A handbook for teacher-researchers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Kavale, K. A. & Forness, S. R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classifications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Kirsch, G. E. & Mortensen, P. (1996). Introduction: Reflections on methodology in literacy studies. In G. E. Kirsch & P. Mortensen (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies in literacy (pp. xix-xxxiv). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
19. LeCompte, M. D. & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
20. Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst, MA: Center for International Education.
21. Marek, E. A. & Methven, S. B. (1991). Effects of the learning cycle upon student and classroom teacher performance. Journal of Research in Science T eaching, 28, 41-53.
22. Newkirk, T. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. In G. E. Kirsch & P. Mortensen (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies in literacy (pp. 3-6). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
23. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. Patai, D. (1987). Ethical problems of personal narratives, or, who should eat the last piece of cake? International Journal of Oral History, 8, 5-27.
25. Schulz, R., Schroeder, D., & Brody, C. M. (1997). Collaborative narrative inquiry: Fidelity and the ethics of caring in teacher research. International Journal of Qualitative Studie in Ed-ucation, 10, 473-485.
26. Smits, H., Friesen, D., Hicks, N., & Leroy, C. (1997). Encountering obligation in qualitative educational research: A postmodern perspective. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43, 192-206.
27. Soltis, J. F. (1990). The ethics of qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 247-257). New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Stone, C. A. (1989). Improving the effectiveness of strategy training for learning disabled students: The role of communication dynamics. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 35-42.
29. Tedlock, B. (1991). From participant observation to the observation of participation: The emergence of narrative ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47, 69-94.
30. Ulichny, P. & Schoener, W. (1996). Teacher-researcher collaboration from two perspectives. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 496-524.
31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Whittaker, C. (November 1995). Collaborative teachingonthe middle school level. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Council of Teachers of English, San Diego, CA.
34. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Wong, E. D. (1995). Challenges confronting the researcher/teacher: Conflicts of purpose and conduct. Educational Researcher, 24, 22-28.
36. Zigo, D. (1998). “We have needs”: The meaning-making strategies of urban middle school struggling readers in special education classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.