Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 735-741

  Byatt, Graham ^a   Rhodes, Gillian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ETHNIC GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; ETHNIC GROUPS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 15544364624     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196628     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ASHBY, F. G. (1992). Multidimensional models of categorization. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 449-484). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BOTHWELL, R. K., BRIGHAM, J. C., & MALPASS, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.
3. BRUCE, V., BURTON, M. A., & DENCH, N. (1994). What's distinctive about a distinctive face? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 119-141.
4. BUSEY, T. A., & TUNNICLIFF, J. L. (1999). Accounts of blending, distinctiveness, and typicality in the false recognition of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1210-1235.
5. BYATT, G., & RHODES, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and otherrace caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2455-2468.
6. CHIRORO, P., & VALENTINE, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879-894.
7. CRAW, I. (1995). A manifold model of face and object recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations in face space (pp. 183-203). London: Routledge.
8. GOLDSTEIN, A. G. (1979a). Facial feature variation: Anthropometric data II. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 191-193.
9. GOLDSTEIN, A. G. (1979b). Race-related variation of facial features: Anthropometric data I. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 187-190.
10. HANCOCK, P. J. B., BURTON, A. M., & BRUCE, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 26-40.
11. JOHNSTON, R. A., KANAZAWA, M., KATO, T., & ODA, M. (1997). Exploring the structure of multidimensional face-space: The effects of age and gender. Visual Cognition, 4, 39-57.
12. JOHNSTON, R. A., MILNE, A. B., & WILLIAMS, C. (1997). Do distinctive faces come from outer space? An investigation of the status of a multidimensional face-space. Visual Cognition, 4, 59-67.
13. KRUSKAL, J. B., & WISH, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. LEE, K. J., BYATT, G., & RHODES, G. (2000). Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: Testing the face-space framework. Psychological Science, 11, 379-385.
15. LEVIN, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559-574.
16. MACLIN, O. H., & MALPASS, R. S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 7, 98-118.
17. MEISSNER, C. A., & BRIGHAM, C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 1, 3-35.
18. NOSOFSKY, R. [M.] (1985). Overall similarity and the identification of separable-dimension stimuli: A choice model analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 415-432.
19. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
20. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 25-53.
21. O'TOOLE, A. J., ABDI, H., DEFFENBACHER, K. A., & VALENTIN, D. (1993). Low-dimensional representation effaces in higher dimensions of the face space. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 405-410.
22. RHODES, G., BYATT, G., TREMEWAN, T., & KENNEDY, A. (1997). Facial distinctiveness and the power of caricatures. Perception, 26, 207-223.
23. SHEPARD, R. N. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika, 22, 325-345.
24. SHEPARD, R. N. (1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 210, 390-398.
25. VALENTINE, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
26. VALENTINE, T. (2001). Face-space models of face recognition. In M. J. Wenger & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Computational, geometric, and process perspectives on facial cognition: Contexts and challenges (pp. 83-113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. VALENTINE, T., & ENDO, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.