A DNA barcoding approach in the study of tardigrades

Journal of Limnology

Volumn 72, Issue SUPPL 1, 2013, Pages 182-198

  Cesari, Michele ^a   Guidetti, Roberto ^a   Rebecchi, Lorena ^a   Giovannini, Ilaria ^a   Bertolani, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cox1; Integrative taxonomy; Macrobiotus hufelandi group; Tardigrada

Indexed keywords

GENE; MICROORGANISM; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MORPHOLOGY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 84880837047     PISSN: 11295767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2013.s1.e23     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Barrett RDH, Hebert PDN, 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcoding. Can. J. Zool. 83:481-489.
2. Bertolani R, Biserov VI, Rebecchi L, Cesari M, 2011a. Taxonomy and biogeography of tardigrades using an integrated approach: new results on species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi group. Invertebr. Zool. 8:23-36.
3. Bertolani R, Giovannini I, Rebecchi L, Cesari M, 2011b. DNA barcoding and integrative taxonomy of Macrobiotus hufelandi C.A.S. Schultze 1834, the first tardigrade species to be described, and some related species. Zootaxa. 2997:19-36.
4. Bertolani R, Rebecchi L, Cesari M, 2010. A model study for tardigrade identification, p. 333-339. In: P.L. Nimis and R. Vignes Lebbe (eds.), Tools for identifying biodiversity: progress and problems. University of Trieste ed.
5. Carolan JC, Murray TE, Fitzpatrick Ú, Crossley J, Schmidt H, Cederberg B, McNally L, Williams PH, Brown MJ, 2012. Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. PLoS One 7:e29251.
6. Casiraghi M, Labra M, Ferri E, Galimberti A, De Mattia F, 2010. DNA barcoding: a six-question tour to improve users' awareness about the method. Brief. Bioinform. 11:440-453.
7. Cesari M, Bertolani R, Rebecchi L, Guidetti R, 2009. DNA barcoding in Tardigrada: the first case study on Macrobiotus macrocalix Bertolani & Rebecchi 1993 (Eutardigrada, Macrobiotidae). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9:699-706.
8. Cesari M, Giovannini I, Bertolani R, Rebecchi L, 2011. An example of problems associated with DNA barcoding in tardigrades: a novel method for obtaining voucher specimens. Zootaxa 3104:42-51.
9. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K, 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9:1657-1660.
10. DeSalle R, 2006. Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: response to Rubinoff. Con. Biol. 20:1545-1547.
11. DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall M, 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 360:1905-1916.
12. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S, 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. 1:47-50.
13. Faurby S, Jönsson KI, Rebecchi L, Funch P, 2008. Variation in anhydrobiotic survival of two eutardigrade morphospecies: a story of cryptic species and their dispersal. J. Zool. 275:139-145.
14. Faurby S, Jørgensen A, Kristensen RM, Funch P, 2011. Phylogeography of North Atlantic intertidal tardigrades: refugia, cryptic speciation and the history of the Mid-Atlantic Islands. J. Biogeogr. 38:1613-1624.
15. Ferri E, Barbuto M, Bain O, Galimberti A, Uni S, Guerriero R, Ferté H, Bandi C, Martin C, Casiraghi M, 2009. Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda). Front. Zool. 6:1.
16. Fontaine B, Bouchet P, van Achterberg K, Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Araujo R, Asche M, Aspöck U, Audisio P, Aukema B, Bailly N, Balsamo M, Bank RA, Barnard P, Belfiore C, Bogdanowicz W, Bongers T, Boxshall G, Burckhardt D, Camicas JL, Chylarecki P, Crucitti P, Deharveng L, Dubois A, Enghoff H, Faubel A, Fochetti R, Gargominy O, Gibson D, Gibson R, Gómez López MS, Goujet D, Harvey MS, Heller KG, van Helsdingen P, Hoch H, de Jong H, de Jong Y, Karsholt O, Los W, Lundqvist L, Magowski W, Manconi R, Martens J, Massard JA, Massard-Geimer G, Mcinnes SJ, Mendes LF, Mey E, Michelsen V, Minelli A, Nieksen C, Nieto Nafría JM, van Nieukerken EJ, Noyes J, Pape T, Pohl H, de Prins W, Ramos M, Ricci C, Roselaar C, Rota E, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Segers H, Zur Strassen R, Szeptycki A, Thibaud JM, Thomas A, Timm T, van Tol J, Vervoort W, Willmann R, 2007. The European Union's 2010 target: putting rare species in focus. Biol. Conserv. 139:167-185.
17. Galimberti A, Spada M, Russo D, Mucedda M, Agnelli P, Crottini A, Ferri E, Martinoli A, Casiraghi M, 2012. Integrated Operational Taxonomic Units (IOTUs) in echolocating bats: a bridge between molecular and traditional taxonomy. PLoS One 7:e40122.
18. Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R, 2011. Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: determination, discovery, and description. Bioessays 33:135-147.
19. Greenstone MH, Rowley DL, Heimbach U, Lundgren JG, Pfannenstiel RS, Rehner SA, 2005. Barcoding generalist predators by polymerase chain reaction: carabids and spiders. Mol. Ecol. 14:3247-3266.
20. Guidetti R, Gandolfi A, Rossi V, Bertolani R, 2005. Phylogenetic analysis in Macrobiotidae (Eutardigrada, Parachela): a combined morphological and molecular approach. Zool. Scr. 34:235-244.
21. Guidetti R, Rebecchi L, Bertolani R, 2000. Cuticle structure and systematics of the Macrobiotidae (Tardigrada, Eutardigrada). Acta Zool. 81:27-36.
22. Guidetti R, Schill RO, Bertolani R, Dandekar T, Wolf M, 2009. New molecular data for tardigrade phylogeny, with the erection of Paramacrobiotus gen. nov. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 47:315-321.
23. Guil N, Giribet G, 2009. Fine scale population structure in the Echiniscus blumi-canadensis series (Heterotardigrada, Tardigrada) in an Iberian mountain range. When morphology fails to explain genetic structure. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 51:606-613.
24. Hajibabei MHM, Shoakralla S, Zhou X, Singer GAC, Baird DJ, 2011. Environmental barcoding: a next-generation sequencing approach for biomonitoring applications using river benthos. PLoS One 6:e17497.
25. Hanner R, 2009. Data Standards for BARCODE Records in INSDC (BRIs). Available from: http://www.barcoding.si.edu/ PDF/DWG_data_standards-Final.pdf
26. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR, 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:313-321.
27. Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Jazen DH, Hallwachs W, 2004a. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator PNAS 101:14812-14817.
28. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR, 2003b. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270(Suppl.1):S96-S99.
29. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM, 2004 Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2:1657-1663.
30. Hogg ID, Hebert PDN, 2004. Biological identification of springtails (Collembola: Hexapoda) from the Canadian Arctic, using mitochondrial DNA barcodes. Can. J. Zool. 82:749-754.
31. Hubert N, Delrieu-Trottin E, Irisson JO, Meyer C, Planes S, 2010. Identifying coral reef fish larvae through DNA barcoding: a test case with the families Acanthuridae and Holocentridae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 55:1195-1203.
32. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcl gene complements the noncoding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One 2:e508.
33. Lambert DM, Baker A, Huynen L, Haddrath O, Hebert PDN, Millar CD, 2005. Is a large-scale DNA-based inventory of ancient life possible? J. Hered. 96:1-6.
34. Lara A, Ponce de León JL, Rodríguez R, Casane D, Côté G, Bernatchez L, García-Machado E, 2010. DNA barcoding of Cuban freshwater fishes: evidence for cryptic species and taxonomic conflicts. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10:421-430.
35. Lefébure T, Douady CJ, Gouy M, Gibert J, 2006. Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40:435-47.
36. Lessios HA, Zigler KS, 2012. Rates of sea urchin bindin evolution, p. 136-143. In: R.S. Singh, J. Xu and R.J. Kulathinal (eds.), Rapidly Evolving Genes and Genetic Systems. Oxford University Press.
37. Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng PKL, 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst. Biol. 55:715-728.
38. Meier R, Zhang G, Ali F, 2008. The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the "barcoding gap" and leads to misidentification. Syst. Biol. 57:809-813.
39. Moritz C, Cicero C, 2004. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2:e354.
40. Packer L, Grixti JC, Roughley RE, Hanner R, 2009. The status of taxonomy in Canada and the impact of DNA barcoding. Can. J. Zool. 87:1097-1110.
41. Padial JM, Miralles A, de la Riva I, Vences M, 2010. The integrative future of taxonomy. Front. Zool. 7:16.
42. Paquin P, Hedin M, 2004. The power and perils of 'molecular taxonomy': a case study of eyeless and endangered Circurina (Araneae: Dictynidae) from Texas caves. Mol. Ecol. 13:3239-3255.
43. Peterson AT, Moyle RG, Nyàri AS, Robbins MB, Brumfield RT, Remsen JV, 2007. The need for proper vouchering in phylogenetic studies of birds. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 45:1042-1044.
44. Pleijel F, Jondelius U, Norlinder E, Nygren A, Oxelman B, Schander C, Sundberg P, Thollesson M, 2008. Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48:369-371.
45. Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT, Hebert PDN, 2009. DNA barcoding of commercially important salmon and trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) from North America. J. Agr. Food Chem. 57:8379-8385.
46. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K, 2006. Genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for "barcoding" identification. J. Hered. 97:581-594.
47. Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF, Crandall KA, 2008. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. PNAS 105:13486-13491.
48. Srivathsan A, Meier R, 2011. On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameters (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature. Cladistics 28:190-194.
49. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stechler G, Nei M, Kumar S, 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739.
50. Taylor HR, Harris WE, 2012. An emergent science on the brink of irrelevance: a review of the past 8 years of DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 12:377-388.
51. Teacher AGF, Griffiths DJ, 2011. HapStar: automated haplotypes network layout and visualization. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11:151-153.
52. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF, 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic association with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633.
53. Vieites DR, Wollenberg KC, Andreone F, Köhler J, Glaw F, Vences M, 2009. Vast underestimation of Madagascar biodiversity evidenced by an integrative amphibian inventory. PNAS 106:8267-8272.
54. Ward RD, Zemak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN, 2005. DNA barcoding of Australia's fish species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 360:1847-1857.
55. Wiemers M, Fiedler K, 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exists? A case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Front. Zool. 4:8.
56. Zhang AB, Heb LJ, Crozier RH, Musterd C, Zhue CD, 2010. Estimating sample sizes for DNA barcoding. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 54:1035-1039.