Zur Explizierung strukturierender Prinzipien mathematischer Unterrichtspraxis

Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 121-146

  Gellert, Uwe ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880793398     PISSN: 01735322     EISSN: 18692699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03339370     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3-42.
3. Askew, M. (2008). Social identities as learners and teachers of mathematics. In A. Watson & P. Winbourne (Hg.), New directions for situated cogniton in mathematics education (S. 59-78). New York: Springer.
4. Atweh, B., Bleicher, R. E. & Cooper, T. J. (1998). The construction of the social context of mathe-matics classrooms: a sociolinguistic analysis. Journal of Research in Mathematics Educa-tion, 29(1), 63-82.
5. Barbé, J., Bosch, M., Espinoza, L. & Gascon, J. (2005). Didactic restrictions on the teacher's practice: The case of limits of functions in Spanish high schools. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1-3), 235-268.
6. Baruk, S. (1985). L'âge du capitaine: de l'erreur en mathématiques. Paris: Seuil.
7. Bauman, Z. (2000). Vom Nutzen der Soziologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
8. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
9. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
10. Bourne, J. (2003). Vertical discourse: the role of the teacher in the transmission and acquisition of decontextualised language. European Educational Research Journal, 2(4), 496-521.
11. Brousseau, G. (1975). Etude de l'influence des conditions de validation sur l'apprentissage d'un algorithme. Bordeaux: IREM.
12. Brousseau, G. (1984). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and construction of situations in teaching and learning mathematics. In H. G. Steiner, N. Balacheff, J. Mason, H. Steinbring, L. P. Steffe, G. Brousseau, T. J. Cooney & B. Christiansen, Theory of Ma-thematics Education (TME) (S. 110-119). Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld/ID.
13. Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 33-115.
14. Brousseau, G. (1990). Le contrat didactique: le milieu. Recherches en Didactique des Mathémati-ques, 9(3), 308-336.
15. Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique: du savoir savant au savoir enseigné. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
16. Chevallard, Y., Bosch, M. & Gascon, J. (1997). Estudiar matemâticas: el eslabón perdido entre la ensenanzay el aprendizaje. Barcelona: ICE-Horsori.
17. Civil, M. (2002). Everyday mathematics, mathematicians' mathematics, and school mathematics: can we bring them together? In J. Moschkovich & M. Brenner (Hg.), Everyday mathematics. Monographs of the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 40-62.
18. Cooper, B. & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children's mathematical knowledge: social class, sex and problem-solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Damerow, P., Elwitz, U., Keitel, C. & Zimmer, J. (1974). Elementarmathematik: Lernen fur die Praxis? Ein exemplarischer Versuch zur Bestimmung fachüberschreitender Curriculum-ziele. Stuttgart: Klett.
20. de Abreu, G. (2000). Relationships between macro and micro socio-cultural contexts: implications for the study of interactions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathe-matics, 41(1), 1-29.
21. Dowling, P. (1996). A sociological analysis of school mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 389-415.
22. Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: mathematical myth/pedagogic texts. London: Routledge Falmer.
23. Ernest, P. (2006). A semiotic perspective of mathematical activity: the case of number. Educa-tional Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 67-101.
24. Ernest, P. (2008). Opening the mathematics text: what does it say? In E. de Freitas & K. Nolan (Hg.), Opening the reseach text: critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics e-ducation (S. 65-80). New York: Springer.
25. Freudenthal, H. (1982). Fiabilité, validité et pertinence: critères de la recherche sur l'enseignement de la mathématique. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13(4), 395-408.
26. Gellert, U. (2008). Validity and relevance: comparing and combining two sociological perspectives on mathematics classroom practice. ZDM- The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40(2), 215-224.
27. Gellert, U. & Hummer, A.-M. (2008). Soziale Konstruktion von Leistung im Unterricht. Zeit-schrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 11(2), 288-311.
28. Gellert, U. & Jablonka, E. (2002a). Tasks and questions used in international assessment of ma-thematical literacy. In L. Bazzini & C. Whybrow Inchley (Hg.), Mathematical literacy in the digital era (S. 114-118). Mailand: Ghisetti e Corvi.
29. Gellert, U. & Jablonka, E. (2002b). Testing the validity of test items. In L. Bazzini & C. Whybrow Inchley (Hg.), Mathematical literacy in the digital era (S. 327-331). Mailand: Ghisetti e Corvi.
30. Gellert, U. & Jablonka, E. (Hg.) (2007). Mathematisation and demathematisation: social, philoso-phical and educational ramifications. Rotterdam: Sense.
31. Gellert, U. & Jablonka, E. (in press). I am not talking about reality. Word problems and the intricacies of producing legitimate text. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. van Dooren & S. Mu-khopadhyay (Hg.), Words and worlds: modelling verbal descriptions of situations. Taipeh: Sense.
32. Gellert, IL, Jablonka, E. & Keitel, C. (2001). Mathematical literacy and common sense in mathe-matics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Hg.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: an international perspective (S. 57-73). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Gorgorió, N., Planas, N. & Vilella, X. (2002). Immigrant children learning mathematics in main-stream schools. In G. de Abreu, A. J. Bishop & N. C. Presmeg (Hg.), Transitions between contexts of mathematical practices (S. 23-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34. Gross, D. & Harris, CM. (1998). Fundamentals ofqueueing theory. New York: Wiley.
35. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotici the social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park.
36. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
37. Hoadley, U. (2007). The reproduction of social class inequalities through mathematics pedagogies in South African primary schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(6), 679-706.
38. Hyde, J. S., Else-Quest, N. M., Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. & Romberg, T. (2006). Mathematics in the home: homework practices and mother-child interactions doing mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 136-152.
39. IREM (Equipe "Elémentaire" de l' I. R. E. M. de Grenoble) (1980). Quel est l'âge du capitaine? Bulletin de l'Association des Professeurs de Mathématique de l'Enseignement Public, 323, 235-243.
40. Jablonka, E. (2004). Structure in diversity: initiation into mathematical practice in classrooms from Germany, Hong Kong and the United States. Habilitationsschrift. Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie.
41. Jablonka, E., Gellert, U., Knipping, C. & Reid, D. A. (2008). The production of legitimate text and the stratification of achievement in mathematics classrooms. In J. F. Matos, P. Valero & K. Yasukawa (Hg.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Mathematics Education and Soci-ety Conference (S. 122-124). Lissabon: Universidade de Lisboa.
42. Keitel, C, Kotzmann, E. & Skovsmose, O. (1993). Beyond the tunnel vision: analysing the rela-tionship between mathematics, society and technology. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Hg.), Learning from computers: mathematics education and technology (S. 243-279). Berlin: Sprinter.
43. Knipping, C, Reid, D. A., Gellert, U. & Jablonka, E. (2008). The emergence of disparity in per-formance in mathematics classrooms. In J. F. Matos, P. Valero & K. Yasukawa (Hg.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (S. 320-329). Lissabon: Universidade de Lisboa.
44. Krummheuer, G. (1992). Lernen mit Format. Elemente einer interaktionistischen Lerntheorie; dis-kutiert an Beispielen mathematischen Unterrichts. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
45. Lerman, S. (2006). Theories of mathematics education: is plurality a problem? Zentralblatt fiir Di-daktik der Mathematik, 38(1), 8-13.
46. Lerman, S. & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). The socio-political context ot the mathematics classroom: using Bernstein's theoretical framework to understand classroom communications. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Hg.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathemat-ics education: issues of power in theory and methodology (S. 27-42). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
47. Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: the contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65, 1-20.
48. Morais, A. M. & Mirando, C. (1996). Understanding teachers' evaluation criteria: a condition for success in sciente classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 601-624.
49. Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: the discourse of investigtion. London: Falmer.
50. Morgan, C, Tsatsaroni, A. & Lerman, S. (2002). Mathematics teachers' positions and practices in discourses of assessment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23, 445-461.
51. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 42(2/3), 189-212.
52. Moschkovich, J. & Brenner, M. (Hg.) (2002). Everyday mathematics. Monograph of the Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 11.
53. Niss, M. (2006). The structure of mathematics and its influence on the learning process. In J. Ma-asz & W. Schloeglmann (Hg.), New mathematics education research and practice (S. 51-62). Rotterdam: Sense.
54. Palm, T. (2008). Impact of authenticity on sense making in word problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 37-58.
55. Reusser, K. & Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution: the social rationality of ma-thematical modeling in schools. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 309-327.
56. Schütte, M. (2009). Sprache und Interaktion im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule. Zur Problematik einer Impliziten Pädagogik für schulisches Lernen im Kontext sprachlich-kultureller Pluralität. Münster: Waxmann.
57. SEAC (Schools Examinations and Assessment Council) (1992). Mathematics tests 1992, key stage 3. London: University of London.
58. SEAC (Schools Examinations and Assessment Council) (1993). Pilot standard tests: key stage 2: mathematics. Leeds: University of Leeds.
59. Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein's theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571-582.
60. Theule Lubienski, S. (2000a). Problem solving as a means towards mathematics for all: an ex-ploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454-482.
61. Theule Lubienski, S. (2000b). A clash of social class cultures? Students' experiences in a discus-sion-intensive seventh-grade mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 377-403.
62. Theule Lubienski, S. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in U. S. mathematics education. Mathe-matical Thinking and Learning, 4(2/3), 103-125.
63. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B. & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: S wets & Zeitlinger.
64. Verstappen, P. (1996). Mathematics and reality. The dogma: from the everyday world to the ma-thematical world. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 96(2), 47-56.
65. Voigt, J. (1984). Interaktionsmuster und Routinen im Mathematikunterricht. Theoretische Grund-lagen und mikroethnographische Falluntersuchungen. Weinheim: Beltz.
66. Walkerdine, V. (1989). Counting girls out. London: Virago.
67. Wyndhamn, J. & Säljö, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning: a study of children's mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 361-382.
68. Yoshida, H., Verschaffel, L. & De Corte, E (1997). Realistic considerations in solving problematic word problems: do Japanese and Belgian children have the same difficulties? Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 329-338.