Municipal visions, market realities: Does planning guide residential development?

Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 449-462

  Langlois, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MARKET DEVELOPMENT; METROPOLITAN AREA; PLANNING METHOD; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 77953328975     PISSN: 02658135     EISSN: 14723417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/b34103     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alexander D, Tomalty R, 2002, Smart growth and sustainable development: challenges, solutions and policy directions Local Environment 7 397-409
2. Bartlett R, 2003, Testing the 'Popsicle test': realities of retail shopping in new 'traditional neighbourhood developments' Urban Studies 40 1471-1485
3. Brody S D, Highfield W E, 2005, Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida Journal of the American Planning Association 71 159-175
4. Brown B B, Cropper V L, 2001, New urban and standard subdivisions: evaluating psychological and social goals Journal of the American Planning Association 67 402-419
5. Caruso D, Sands G, 2001, Problems in implementing New Urbanism, paper presented at the National Planning Conference of the American Planning Association, New Orleans, http://design.asu.edu/apa/proceedings01/CARUSO/caruso.htm
6. Cervero R, Kockelman K, 1997, Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2 199-219
7. Congress For The New Urbanism, 2001, Charter of the New Urbanism, http://www.cnu.org/ sites/files/charter_english.pdf
8. Dodson M E, Garrett T A, 2004, Inefficient education spending in public school districts: a case study for consolidation? Contemporary Economic Policy 22 270-280
9. Downs A, 2005, Smart Growth: why we discuss it more than we do it Journal of the American Planning Association 71 367-378
10. Dunkley B, Helling A, Sawicki D S, 2004, Accessibility versus scale: examining the tradeoffs in grocery stores Journal of Planning Education and Research 23 387-401
11. Ferris J S, West E G, 2004, Economies of scale, school violence and the optimal size of schools Applied Economics 36 1677-1684
12. Filion P, 2003, Towards Smart Growth? The difficult implementation of alternatives to urban dispersion Canadian Journal of Urban Research 12(1) 48-70
13. Filion P, McSpurren K, 2007, Smart Growth and development reality: the difficult coordination of land use and transport objectives Urban Studies 44 501-523
14. Ford L R, 2001, Alleys and urban form: testing the tenets of New Urbanism Urban Geography 22 268-286
15. Gordon D, Tamminga K, 2002, Large-scale traditional neighbourhood development and preemptive ecosystem planning: the Markham experience,1989-2001 Journal of Urban Design 7 321-340
16. Gordon D, Vipond S, 2005, Gross density and New Urbanism: comparing conventional and New Urbanist suburbs in Markham, Ontario Journal of the American Planning Association 71 41-54
17. Grant J, 2002, Mixed use in theory and practice Journal of the American Planning Association 68 71-84
18. Grant J, 2003, Exploring the influence of New Urbanism in community planning practice Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 20 234-253
19. Grant J, 2006 Planning the Good Community: New Urbanism in Theory and Practice (Routledge, New York)
20. Grant J, 2009, Theory and practice in planning the suburbs: challenges to implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and sustainability principles Planning Theory and Practice 10 11-33
21. Hume C, 2009, Transit hubs to shape urban pocket in Markham The Toronto Star 25 May, http://www.yourhome.ca./homes/article/639723
22. Kashef M, 2007, Architects and planners approaches to urban form and design in the Toronto region: a comparative analysis Geoforum 39 414-437
23. Keil R, Graham J, 1998, Reasserting nature: constructing urban environments after Fordism, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds B Braun, N Castree (Routledge, London)
24. Konishi H, 2005, Concentration of competing retail stores Journal of Urbanism Economics 58 488-512
25. Krizek K J, 2003, Operationalizing neighborhood accessibility for land-use-travel behavior research and regional modeling Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 207-287
26. Lee C M, Ahn K H, 2003, Is Kentlands better than Radburn? The American Garden City and New Urbanist paradigms Journal of the American Planning Association 69 50-71
27. Lorch B, 2005, Auto-dependent induced shopping: exploring the relationship between power centre morphology and consumer spatial behaviour Canadian Journal of Urban Research 14 364-383
28. Lund H, 2003, Testing the claims of New Urbanism Journal of the American Planning Association 69 414-429
29. Markovich J, Hendler S, 2006, Beyond 'soccer moms' Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 410-427
30. Schlossberg M, Phillips P P, Johnson B, Parker B, 2005, How do they get there? A spatial analysis of a 'sprawl school' in Oregon Planning, Practice and Research 20 147-162
31. Skaburskis A, 2006, New urbanism and sprawl: aToronto case study Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 233-248
32. Song Y, 2005, Smart Growth and urban development pattern: a comparative study International Regional Science Review 28 239-265
33. Song Y, Knaap G J, 2004, Measuring urban form: is Portland winning the war on sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association 70 210-225
34. Statistics Canada, 2007, 2006 Census Dictionary: Dissemination Area (DA): Geography, http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/reference/dictionary/geo021.cfm
35. Steuteville R, 2000 New Urbanism and Traditional Neighborhood Development: Comprehensive Report and Best Practices Guide (New Urban News, Ithaca, NY)
36. Talen E, 1996, After the plans: methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans Journal of Planning Education and Research 16 79-91
37. Thompson-Fawcett M, Bond S, 2003, Urbanist intentions for the built landscape: examples of concept and practice in England, Canada and New Zealand Progress in Planning 60 147-234
38. Vaughan Planning Department, 1991 Vaughan Policy Review Phase 1: Planning Matters Shaping Vaughan's Future City of Vaughan, Vaughan, ON
39. Wheeler S M, 2003, The evolution of urban form in Portland and Toronto: implications for sustainability planning Local Environment 8 317-336