The L.A. school and politics noir: Bringing the local state back in

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 537-557

  Erie, Steven P ^a   Mackenzie, Scott A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; STATE BUILDING; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLITICS; WORLD CITY;

CALIFORNIA; LOS ANGELES; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 71249158848     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: 14679906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00453.x     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abbott C. The new urban America: Growth and politics in Sunbelt cities 1981, Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press
2. Abu-Lughod J thomampersan. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's global cities 1999, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press
3. Alchian A A, Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review 1972, 62(5):777-795.
4. Baldassare M. The Los Angeles riots: Lessons for the urban future 1994, Boulder, CO, Westview Press
5. Banfield E C. Political influence: A new theory of urban politics 1961, New York, Free Press
6. Banfield E C. Big city politics 1965, New York, Random House
7. Banfield E C, Wilson J Q. City politics 1963, New York, Vintage
8. Bernard R M, Rice B R. Sunbelt cities: Politics and growth since World War II 1983, Eds, Austin, University of Texas Press
9. Beveridge A A, Weber S, Halle D. Race and class in the developing New York and Los Angeles metropolises, 1940-2000. New York and Los Angeles: Politics, society, and culture 2003, 49-78. In, Ed, pp, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
10. Bigger R, Kitchen J D. How the cities grew 1952, Los Angeles, Haynes Foundation
11. Bridges A. Morning glories: Municipal reform in the Southwest 1997, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
12. Carney F M. The decentralized politics of Los Angeles. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1964, 353:107-121.
13. Clark G L, Dear M J. State apparatus: Structures and languages of legitimacy 1984, Boston, MA, Allen & Unwin
14. Coase R H. The nature of the firm. Economica 1937, 4:386-405.
15. Crouch W W, Dinerman B. Southern California metropolis: A study in development of government for a metropolitan area 1963, Berkeley, University of California Press
16. Dahl R. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city 1961, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
17. Davis M. City of quartz: Excavating the future of Los Angeles 1990, London, Verso
18. Davis M, Sorkin M. Fortress Los Angeles. Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space 1992, 154-180. In, Ed, pp, New York, Hill and Wang
19. Davis M. Ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster 1998, New York, Metropolitan Books
20. Dear M J. Postmodernism and planning. Society and Space 1986, 4(3):367-384.
21. Dear M J. Review of Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory, by Edward W. Soja. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1990, 80(4):649-654.
22. Dear M J, Scott A J, Soja E W. In the city, time becomes visible: Intentionality and urbanism in Los Angeles, 1781-1991. The city: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century 1996, 76-105. In, Eds, pp, Berkeley, University of California Press
23. Dear M J. The postmodern urban condition 2000, Malden, MA, Blackwell Publishers
24. Dear M J. Los Angeles and Chicago schools: An invitation to debate. City and Community 2002a, 1(1):5-32.
25. Dear M J. From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory 2002b, Ed, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
26. Dear M J, Flusty S, Dear M J. Los Angeles as postmodern urbanism. From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory 2002a, 61-84. In, Ed, pp, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
27. Dear M J, Flusty S, Dear M J. The resistible rise of the L.A. School. From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory 2002b, 3-17. In, Ed, pp, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
28. Dear M J, Schockman E, Hise G. Rethinking Los Angeles 1996, Eds, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
29. Dear M J, Scott A J. Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society 1981, Eds, New York, Methuen
30. Dear M J, Wolch J R. Landscapes of despair: From deinstitutionalization to homelessness 1987, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
31. Elkin S. City and regime in the American republic 1987, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
32. Erie S P. How the urban west was won. Urban Affairs Quarterly 1992, 27(4):519-554.
33. Erie S P, Dear M J. Los Angeles as a developmental city-state. From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory 2002, 131-159. In, Ed, pp, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
34. Erie S P. Globalizing L.A.: Trade, infrastructure, and regional development 2004, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press
35. Erie S P. Beyond Chinatown: The metropolitan water district, growth, and the environment in Southern California 2006, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press
36. Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T. Bringing the state back in 1985, New York, Cambridge University Press
37. Fiorina M P. Culture war? The myth of a polarized America 2005, New York, Pearson Longman
38. Fishman R, Fogelson R M. Foreword. The fragmented metropolis: Los Angeles, 1850-1930 1993, xv-xxviii. In, pp, Berkeley, University of California Press
39. Fogelson R M. The fragmented metropolis: Los Angeles, 1850-1930 1967, Berkeley, University of California Press
40. Friedricks W B. Henry E. Huntington and the creation of Southern California 1992, Columbus, OH, Ohio State University Press
41. Garreau J. Edge city: Life on the new frontier 1991, New York, Anchor Books
42. Gerschenkron A. Economic backwardness in historical perspective 1962, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press
43. Gilliam F J. Exploring minority empowerment: Symbolic politics, governing coalitions and traces of political style in Los Angeles. American Journal of Political Science 1996, 40(1):56-81.
44. Grey A L. Los Angeles: Urban prototype. Land Economics 1959, 35(3):232-242.
45. Halle D, Halle D. The New York and Los Angeles schools. New York and Los Angeles: Politics, society, and culture 2003, 1-46. In, Ed, pp, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press
46. Hise G. Magnetic Los Angeles: Planning the twentieth-century metropolis 1997, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press
47. Hoene C, Baldassare M, Shires M. The development of counties as municipal governments: A case study of Los Angeles County in the twenty-first century. Urban Affairs Review 2002, 37(4):575-591.
48. Hoffman A. Vision or villainy: Origins of the Owens Valley-Los Angeles water controversy 1981, College Station, TX, Texas A&M University Press
49. Jacobson G C. Polarized politics and the 2004 congressional and presidential elections. Political Science Quarterly 2005, 120(2):199-218.
50. Jones-Correa M. Governing American cities: Inter-ethnic coalitions, competitions, and conflict 2001, Ed, New York, Russell Sage Foundation
51. Kantor P. The dependant city revisited: The political economy of urban development and social policy 1995, Boulder, CO, Westview Press
52. Libecap G D. Owens Valley revisited: A reassessment of the West's first great water transfer 2007, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press
53. Lowi T J. Machine politics - old and new. Public Interest 1967, 9:83-92.
54. Lupia A. Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review 1994, 88(1):63-76.
55. McCarty N, Poole K T, Rosenthal H. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches 2006, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
56. McKenzie E. Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government 1994, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
57. Miller D W. The new urban studies. The Chronicle of Higher Education 2000, 46(50):A15-A16.
58. Miller G J. Cities by contract: The politics of municipal incorporation 1981, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
59. Mollenkopf J H. The contested city 1983, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
60. Mollenkopf J H, Champeny A, Sonenshein R J, Drayse M. Race, ethnicity, and immigration in the 2005 mayoral elections in Los Angeles and New York. 2006, Working Paper, Berkeley, CA, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley
61. Mollenkopf J H, Olson D, Ross T, Jones-Correa M. Immigrant political participation in New York and Los Angeles. Governing American cities: Inter-ethnic coalitions, competitions, and conflict 2001, 17-70. In, Ed, pp, New York, Russell Sage Foundation
62. Ostrom V. Water and politics: A study of water policies and administration in the development of Los Angeles 1953, Los Angeles, CA, Haynes Foundation
63. Park R E, Burgess E W, McKenzie R D. The city 1925, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
64. Pastor M, Sadd J, Morello-Frosch R. The air is always cleaner on the other side: Race, space, and air toxics exposures in California. Journal of Urban Affairs 2005, 27(2):127-148.
65. Peterson P E. City limits 1981, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
66. Regalado J A. Organized labor and Los Angeles city politics: An assessment in the Bradley years, 1973-1989. Urban Affairs Quarterly 1991, 27(1):87-108.
67. Sayre W, Kaufman H. Governing New York City: Politics in the metropolis 1960, New York, W. W. Norton
68. Schiesl M J, Kling R, Olin S, Poster M. Designing the model community: The Irvine Company and suburban development, 1950-88. Postsuburban California: The transformation of Orange County since World War II 1991, 55-91. In, Eds, pp, Berkeley, University of California Press
69. Schockman H E, Dear M J, Schockman H E, Hise G. Is Los Angeles governable? Revisiting the city charter. Rethinking Los Angeles 1996, 57-75. In, Eds, pp, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
70. Scott A J. The urban land nexus and the state 1980, London, Pion
71. Scott A J. Metropolis: From the division of labor to urban form 1988a, Berkeley, University of California Press
72. Scott A J. New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe 1988b, London, Pion
73. Scott A J. Technopolis: High technology and regional development in Southern California 1993, Berkeley, University of California Press
74. Scott A J, Scott A J, Soja E W. High technology industrial development in the San Fernando Valley and Ventura County. The city: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century 1996, 276-310. In, Eds, pp, Berkeley, University of California Press
75. Scott A J, Dear M J. Industrial urbanism in late-twentieth-century Southern California. From Chicago to L.A.: Making sense of urban theory 2002, 3-17. In, Ed, pp, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
76. Scott A J, Soja E W. The city: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century 1996, Eds, Berkeley, University of California Press
77. Shefter M. Political crisis, fiscal crisis: The collapse and revival of New York City 1985, New York, Basic Books
78. Soja E W. Postmodern geographies 1989, New York, Verso
79. Soja E W, Scott A J, Soja E W. Los Angeles, 1965-1992. The city: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century 1996, 426-462. In, Eds, pp, Berkeley, University of California Press
80. Sonenshein R J. Politics in black and white: Race and power in Los Angeles 1993, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
81. Sonenshein R J, Pinkus S H. The dynamics of Latino incorporation: The 2001 Los Angeles mayoral election as seen in " Los Angeles Times" exit polls. PS: Political Science and Politics 2002, 35(1):67-74.
82. Sonenshein R J. The city at stake: Succession, reform, and the battle for Los Angeles 2004, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
83. Sonenshein R J. Los Angeles: Structure of a city government 2006, Los Angeles, CA, League of Women Voters of Los Angeles
84. Sorkin M, Sorkin M. Introduction: Variations on a theme park. Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space 1992, xi-xv. In, Ed, pp, New York, Hill and Wang
85. Stone C. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988 1989, Lawrence, University of Kansas Press
86. Swanstrom T. The crisis of growth politics: Cleveland, Kucinich, and the challenge of urban populism 1985, Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press
87. Tiebout C M. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 1956, 64:416-464.
88. Williamson O E. The logic of economic organization. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 1988, 4(1):65-93.
89. Wilson J Q. The amateur democrat: Club politics in three cities 1962, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
90. Wirth L. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology 1938, 42(4):493-509.
91. Wolch J. The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition 1990, New York, The Foundation Center
92. Wolch J, Pastor M, Dreier P, Wolch J, Pastor M, Dreier P. Making Southern California: Public policy, markets, and the dynamics of growth. Up against the sprawl: Public policy and the making of Southern California 2004, 1-44. In, Eds, pp, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press