Structural choice modelling: Theory and applications to combining choice experiments

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1-29

  Rungie, Campbell M ^a   Coote, Leonard V ^b   Louviere, Jordan J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Choice models; Discrete choice experiments; Latent variables; Structural equation models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880554518     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70040-X     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ashok, K., W. R., Dillon and S., Yuan, 2002. Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(February), 31-46.
2. Ben-Akiva, M. and S. R., Lerman, 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Boston, The MIT Press.
3. Ben-Akiva, M., D. McFadden, M. Abe, U. Böckenholt, D. Bolduc, D. Gopinath, T. Morikawa, V. Ramaswamy, V. Rao, D. Revelt, D., Steinberg, 1997. Modelling methods for discrete choice analysis. Marketing Letters, 8(3) 273-286 (Pubitemid 127542157)
4. Ben-Akiva, M., D., McFadden, K., Train, J., Walker, C., Bhat, M., Bierlaire, D., Bolduc, Z., Boersch-Supan, D., Brownstone, D. S., Bunch, A., Daly, A. De Palma, D., Gopinath, A., Karlstrom, and M. A., Munizaga, 2002. Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges. Marketing Letters, 13(3), 163-175.
5. Ben-Akiva, M. and T., Morikawa, 1990. Estimation of switching models from revealed preference and stated intentions. Transportation Research Part A, 24(6) 485-495.
6. Bolduc, D. and R., Alvarez-Daziano, 2010. On estimation of hybrid choice models, in S. Hess and A. Daly (Eds.), Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-Art and the State-of-Practice, Emerald, England, 2010.
7. Bollen, K. A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
8. Dube, J-P., P., Chintagunta, A., Petrin, B., Bronenberg, R., Goettler, P. B., Seetharaman, K., Sudhir, R., Thomadsen, Y., Zhao, 2002. Structural applications of the discrete choice model. Marketing Letters, 13(3), 207-220.
9. Elrod, T., 1988. Choice map: Inferring a product-market map from panel data. Marketing Science 7(1 Winter), 21-40.
10. Elrod, T. and M. P., Keane., 1995. A factor-analytic probit model for representing the market structure in panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 1-16.
11. Fiebig, D. G., M. P., Keane, J., Louviere, and N., Wasi, 2010. A generalized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 29(3 May June), 393-421.
12. Finn, A. and J. J., Louviere, 1992. Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: The case of food safety. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 11(2), 12-25.
13. Hensher, D., J., Louviere and J., Swait, 1999. Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics, 89, 197-221. (Pubitemid 128416651)
14. Hess, S. and A. Stathopoulos, 2011. Linking response quality to survey engagement: a combined random scale and latent variable approach. Leads, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
15. Jöreskog, K. G., 1970. A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika, 57, 239-251.
16. Jöreskog, K. G., 1973. A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. Structural equation models in the social sciences, A. S., Goldberger and O. D., Duncan. New York, Seminar Press, 85-112.
17. Jöreskog, K. G. and D., Sörbom, 1996. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide, Lincolnwood, IL, Scientific Software International.
18. Kamakura, W. A. and G. J., Russell, 1989. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(November), 379-90.
19. Keane, M. P., 1997. Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behaviour, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15(3 July), 310-327.
20. Lee, J. A., G. N., Soutar, and J. J., Louviere, 2007. Measuring values using best-worst scaling: The LOV example. Psychology and Marketing, 24(12), 1043-1058.
21. Louviere, J., D. Street, R. Carson, A. Ainslie, J. R. Deshazo, R. Cameron, D., Hensher, R., Kohn, and A., Marley, 2002. Dissecting the random component of utility. Marketing Letters, 13(3) 177-193.
22. Louviere, J. J., D. A., Hensher and J. D., Swait, 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
23. Louviere, J. J., R. J., Meyer, D.S., Bunch, R., Carson, B., Dellarert, W. M., Hanemann, D., Hensher, and J., Irwin, 1999. Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision processes. Marketing Letters, 10(3), 205-217.
24. Louviere, J. J. and G. G., Woodworth, 1983. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-67.
25. Luce, R. D., 1959. Individual Choice Behavior; A Theoretical Analysis, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
26. Marley, A. A. J., 2009. The Best-Worst Method for the Study of Preferences: Theory and Application. Working paper, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Canada.
27. McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, Frontiers in Econometrics, P. Zarembka. New York, NY, Academic Press: 105-142.
28. McFadden, D., 1980. Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. Journal of Business, 53(3, Pt2), S13-S29.
29. McFadden, D., 2001. Disaggregate behavioral travel demand's RUM Side: A 30-year retrospective, The Leading Edge of Travel Behavior Research, D., Hensher. Oxford, Pergamon Press.
30. McFadden, D. and K., Train, 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447-470.
31. Morikawa, T., M., Ben-Akiva, and D., McFadden, 2002. Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preference and psychometric data, Econometric Models in Marketing, 16, 29-55.
32. Rose, J. M., D. A., Hensher, S., Caussade, J. de D., Ortúzar, and R.-C. Jou, 2009. Identifying differences in willingness to pay due to dimensionality in stated choice experiments: a cross country analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(1), 21-29.
33. Temme, D., M., Paulssen and T., Dannewald, 2008. Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models - A simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software, BuR - Business Research, 1(2), 230-237.
34. Train, K., 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation New York, Cambridge University Press.
35. Train, K., 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation New York, Ed2, Cambridge University Press.
36. Walker, J. L., 2001. Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, PhD.
37. Yáñez, M., S., Raveau and J. de D., Ortúzar, 2010. Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: Modelling and forecasting. Transportation Research Part A, 44(9), 744-753.