Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior

Journal of Business and Economic Statistics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 310-327

  Keane, Michael P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Brand choice; Discrete choice model; Method of simulated moments; Multinomial probit; Scanner data

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031489937     PISSN: 07350015     EISSN: 15372707     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.1997.10524709     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allenby, G., and Lenk, P. (1994), “Modeling Household Purchase Behavior With Logistic Normal Regression,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 1218-1231.
2. Avery, R., Hansen, L., and Hotz, V. J. (1983), “Multiperiod Probit Models and Orthogonality Condition Estimation,” International Economic Review, 24, 21-35.
3. Bass, F. (1993), “The Future of Research in Marketing: Marketing Science,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 1-6.
4. Bass, F., Jeuland, A., and Wright, G. (1976), “Equilibrium Stochastic Choice and Market Penetration Theories: Derivations and Comparisons,” Management Science, 22, 1051-1063.
5. Chintagunta, P. (1994), “Heterogeneous Logit Model Implications for Brand Positioning,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 304-311.
6. Elrod, T. (1988), “Choice Map: Inferring a Product Market Map From Panel Data,” Marketing Science, 7, 21-40.
7. Elrod, T., and Keane, M. (1995), “A Factor Analytic Probit Model for Representing the Market Structure in Panel Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 1-16.
8. Erdem, T. (1996), “A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data,” Marketing Science, 15, 359-378.
9. Erdem, T., and Keane, M. (1996), “Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets,” Marketing Science, 15, 1-20.
10. Fader, P. (1993), “Integrating the Dirichlet-multinomial and Logit Models of Brand Choice,” Marketing Letters, 4, 99-112.
11. Fader, P., and Lattin, J. (1993), “Accounting for Heterogeneity and Non-stationarity in a Cross-sectional Model of Consumer Purchase Behavior,” Marketing Science, 11, 372-385.
12. Geweke, J. (1991), “Efficient Simulation From Multivariate Normal and Student-1 Distributions Subject to Linear Constraints,” in Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Symposium on the Interface, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, pp. 571-578.
13. Geweke, J., Keane, M., and Runkle, D. (1994), “Alternative Computational Approaches to Statistical Inference in the Multinomial Probit Model,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 609-632.
14. Geweke, J., Keane, M., and Runkle, D. (in press), “Statistical Inference in the Multinomial Multiperiod Probit Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 1997.
15. Guadagni, P., and Little, J. (1983), “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data,” Marketing Science, 2, 203-238.
16. Hajivassiliou, V., McFadden, D., and Ruud, P. (1994), “Simulation of Multivariate Normal Orthant Probabilities: Methods and Programs,” DP #1021, Yale University, Cowles Foundation.
17. Heckman, J. (1981a), “Heterogeneity and State Dependence,” in Studies in Labor Markets, ed. S. Rosen, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91-139.
18. Heckman, J. (1981b), “The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete Time-Discrete Data Stochastic Process,” in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data With Economic Applications, eds. C. Manski and D. McFadden, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 179-197.
19. Jones, J., and Landwehr, T. (1988), “Removing Heterogeneity Bias From Logit Model Estimation,” Marketing Science, 7, 41-59.
20. Kamakura, W., and Russell, G. (1989), “A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 379-390.
21. Keane, M. (1990), “Four Essays in Empirical Macro and Labor Economics,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University, Dept, of Economics.
22. Keane, M. (1992), “A Note on Identification in the Multinomial Probit Model,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10, 193-200.
23. Keane, M. (1993), “Simulation Estimation for Panel Data Models With Limited Dependent Variables,” in The Handbook of Statistics 11: Econometrics, eds. C. R. Rao, G. S. Maddala, and H. D. Vinod, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 545-572.
24. Keane, M. (1994), “A Computationally Practical Simulation Estimator for Panel Data,” Econometrica, 62, 95-116.
25. McCulloch, R., and Rossi, P. (1994), “An Exact Likelihood Analysis of the Multinomial Probit Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 64, 207-240.
26. McFadden, D. (1989), “A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models Without Numerical Integration,” Econometrica, 51, 995-1026.
27. Neslin, S., and Shoemaker, R. (1989), “An Alternative Explanation for Lower Repeat Rates After Promotion Purchases,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 205-213.
28. Steckel, J., and Vanhonacker, W. (1988), “A Heterogeneous Conditional Logit Model of Choice,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 6, 391-398.