Latent variables in discrete choice experiments

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 145-156

  Rungie, Cam M ^a   Coote, Leonard V ^b   Louviere, Jordan J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Discrete choice experiments; Latent variables; Structural equations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880518915     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2013.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adamowicz, W., Bunch, D., Cameron, T.A., Bellaert, B.G.C., Manneman, M., Keane, M., Louviere, J., Meyer, R., Steenburgh, T., Swait, J., 2008. Behavioral frontiers in choice modeling. Marketing Letters 19, 215-228.
2. Ashok, K., Dillon, W.R., Yuan, S., 2002. Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1), 31-46.
3. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R., 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., Morikawa, T., 1990. Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and state intentions. Transportation Research A 24A (6), 485-495.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A.T., Gopinath, D.A., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., 2002. Integration of choice and latent variable models. In: Mahmassani, H.S. (Ed.), In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 431-470.
6. Bolduc, D., Alvarez-Daziano, R., 2010. On estimation of hybrid choice models. In: Hess, S., Daly, A. (Eds.), Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-Art and the State-of-Practice. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK.
7. Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Bollen, K.A., 2002. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology 53, 605-634.
9. Dunson, D.B., 2000. Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 62 (2), 355-366.
10. Elrod, T., Keane, M.P., 1995. A factor-analytic probit model for representing the market structure in panel data. Journal of Marketing Research 32 (1), 1-16.
11. Fiebig, D.G., Keane, M.P., Louviere, J., Wasi, N., 2010. A generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Science 29 (3 (May-June)), 393-421.
12. Hensher, D.A., Louviere, J., Swait, J., 1999. Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics 89 (1 -2), 197-221. (Pubitemid 128416651)
13. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W.H., 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Hess, S., Stathopoulos, A., 2011. Linking Response Quality to Survey Engagement: A Combined Random Scale and Latent Variable Approach. Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leads.
15. Jöreskog, K.G., 1970. A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika 57, 239-251.
16. Jöreskog, K.G., 1973. A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In: Goldberger, A.S., Duncan, O.D. (Eds.), Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York, pp. 85-112.
17. Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D., 1996. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL.
18. Kamakura, W.A., Russell, G.J., 1989. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research XXVI, 379-390.
19. Keane, M.P., 1997. Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 15 (3), 310-327.
20. Lee, S.Y., 2007. Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, England.
21. Louviere, J.J., Woodworth, G., 1983. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research 20, 350-367.
22. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J., 1999. Conjoint analysis methods in the broader context of preference elicitation methods. In: Gustafson, A., Hermann, A., Huber, F. (Eds.), Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin, pp. 279-318.
23. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait Jr., J., 2000. Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge University Press, New York.
24. Louviere, J.J., Street, D., Carson, R., Ainslie, A., DeShazo, J.R., Cameron, T., Hensher, D.A., Kohn, R., Marley, A.A.J., 2002. Dissecting the random component of utility. Marketing Letters 13 (3), 177-193.
25. Luce, R.D., 1959. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. Wiley, New York.
26. Marschak, J., 1960. Binary choice constraints on random utility indicator. In: Arrow, K.I., Karlin, S., Suppes, P. (Eds.), Stanford Symposium on Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Standford, CA, pp. 312-329.
27. Maydeu-Olivares, A., Böckenholt, O., 2005. Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data. Psychological methods 10, 285-304. (Pubitemid 41527950)
28. McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 105-142.
29. McFadden, D., 2001. Economic choices. American Economic Review 91, 351-378. (Pubitemid 33597251)
30. McFadden, D., Train, K.E., 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15, 447-470.
31. Morikawa, T., Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., 2002. Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preference and psychometric data. Econometric Models in Marketing 16, 29-55.
32. Rungie, C., 2011. Structural Choice Modelling Software Manual DisCoS. AdelaideUniversity of South Australia.
33. Rungie, C., Coote, L.V., Louviere, J.J., 2011. Structural choice modelling: theory and applications to combining choice experiments. Journal of Choice Modelling 4 (3), 1-29.
34. Temme, D., Paulssen, M., Dannewald, T., 2008. Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models: a simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software. Business Research 1 (2), 220-237.
35. Thurstone, L.L., 1927. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 34, 273-286.
36. Train, K.E., 2003. Discrete Choice Models with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
37. Walker, J.L., 2001. Extended Discrete Choice Models: Integrated Framework, Flexible Error Structures, and Latent Variables. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
38. Yáñez, M., Raveau, S., de Dios Ortúzar, J., 2010. Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: modelling and forecasting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44 (9), 744-753.