Characterisation of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes in multi-component mixtures: Phenomena-based modelling and membrane modelling maps

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 445, Issue , 2013, Pages 183-199

  Schmidt, Patrick ^a   Lutze, Philip ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conceptual design; Membrane modelling maps; Organic solvent nanofiltration; Phenomena based modelling; Solute rejection

Indexed keywords

BINARY AND TERNARY MIXTURES; BINARY INTERACTION PARAMETER; MEMBRANE SEPARATION TECHNOLOGY; MULTICOMPONENT MIXTURE; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION (OSN); SEPARATION OF ORGANIC LIQUIDS; SOLUTE REJECTION;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; MIXTURES; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; SOLVENTS;

PERMEATION;

2 PROPANOL; HEXANE; ORGANIC SOLVENT; POLYMER; TOLUENE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DIFFUSION; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; MEMBRANE MODEL; MEMBRANE MODELLING MAP; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC SOLVENT NANOFILTRATION; PARAMETERS; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SOLUTE; VAPOR; VAPOR LIQUID EQUILIBRIUM;

EID: 84880342339     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.062     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E.M., Vankelecom I.F.J. Solvent-resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:365-405.
2. Priske M., Wiese K.D., Drews A., Kraume M., Baumgarten G. Reaction integrated separation of homogenous catalysts in the hydroformylation of higher olefins by means of organophilic nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360:77-83.
3. P. Schmidt, M. Becker, M. Priske, B. Hamers, P. Kreis, A. Górak, Process design of integrated reaction and membrane separation by organic solvent nanofiltration using evolutionary algorithms, in: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 22nd European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, Elsevier, 2012.
4. White L.S. Development of large-scale applications in organic solvent nanofiltration and pervaporation for chemical and refining processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:26-35.
5. Lin J.C.T., Livingston A.G. Nanofiltration membrane cascade for continuous solvent exchange. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62:2728-2736.
6. Geens J., van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Transport model for solvent permeation through nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 48:255-263.
7. Schmidt P., Köse T., Lutze P. Characterisation of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes in multi-component mixtures: membrane rejection maps and membrane selectivity maps for conceptual process design. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:103-120.
8. Marquardt W. Trends in computer-aided process modeling. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20:591-600.
9. J.R. Seay, A Methodology for Integrating Process Design Elements with Laboratory Experiments. Ph.D Thesis, 2008.
10. J.R. Seay, H. Werhan, M.R. Eden, R. D'Alessandro, T. Thomas, H. Redlingshoefer, C. Weckbecker, K. Huthmacher, Integrating laboratory experiments with process simulation for reactor optimization, in: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 17th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process, Elsevier, 2007.
11. Vankelecom I.F.J., De Smet K., Gievers L.E.M., Livingston A.G., Nair D., Aerts S, Kuypers S., Jacobs P.A. Physico-chemical interpretation of the SRNF transport mechanism for solvents through dense silicone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:99-108.
12. Dobrak-Van Berlo A., Vankelecom I.F.J., van der Bruggen B. Parameters determining transport mechanisms through unfilled and silicalite filled PDMS-based membranes and dense PI membranes in solvent resistant nanofiltration: comparison with pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 374:138-149.
13. Zeidler S., Kätzel U., Kreis P. Systematic investigation on the influence of solutes on the separation behavior of a PDMS membrane in organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:295-303.
14. Marchetti P., Butte A., Livingston A.G. An improved phenomenological model for prediction of solvent permeation through ceramic NF and UF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:444-458.
15. Zheng F., Zhang Z., Li C., Yuan Q. A comparative study of suitability on different molecular size descriptors with the consideration of molecular geometry in nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 332:13-23.
16. van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Wilms D., Vandecasteele C. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:29-41.
17. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Bhattacharyya D. Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute-solvent coupling. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:343-359.
18. Wijmans J.G., Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:1-21.
19. Dijkstra M.F.J., Bach S., Ebert K. A transport model for organophilic nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:60-68.
20. Fierro D., Boschetti-de-Fierro A., Abetz V. The solution-diffusion with imperfections model as a method to understand organic solvent nanofiltration of multicomponent systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413-414:91-101.
21. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., Riley R.L. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9:1341-1362.
22. Robinson J.P., Tarleton E.S., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A. Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 230:29-37.
23. Mason E.A., Lonsdale H.K. Statistical-mechanical theory of membrane transport. J. Membr. Sci. 1990, 51:1-81.
24. Machado D.R., Hasson D., Semiat R. Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes: Part II. Transport model. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 166:63-69.
25. Hesse L., Mićović J., Schmidt P., Górak A., Sadowski G. Modelling of organic-solvent flux through a polyimide membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428:554-561.
26. Hesse L., Naeem S., Sadowski G. VOC sorption in glassy polyimides -measurements and modelling. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:596-607.
27. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Kurth C., Bhattacharyya D. Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 189:1-21.
28. Lencki R.W., Williams S. Effect of nonaqueous solvents on the flux behavior of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 101:43-51.
29. Silva P., Han S., Livingston A.G. Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 262:49-59.
30. Geens J., Boussu K., Vandecasteele C., van der Bruggen B. Modelling of solute transport in non-aqueous nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:139-148.
31. van der Bruggen B., Geens J., Vandecasteele C. Influence of organic solvents on the performance of polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2002, 37:783-797.
32. Geens J., Hillen A., Bettens B., van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Solute transport in non-aqueous nanofiltration: effect of membrane material. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80:1371-1377.
33. Peng D.-Y., Robinson D. A new two-constant equation of state. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1976, 15:59-64.
34. Huron M.-J., Vidal J. New mixing rules in simple equations of state for representing vapor-liquid equilibria of strongly non-ideal mixtures. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1979, 3:255-271.
35. Dahl S., Michelsen M.L. High-pressure vapor-liquid equilibrium with a UNIFAC-based equation of state. AlChE J. 1990, 36:1829-1836.
36. Wilke C.R., Chang P. Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions. AlChE J. 1955, 1:264-270.
37. Ryan T.P. Modern Regression Methods 1997, Wiley, New York.
38. Press W.H. Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
39. Aspen Custom Modeler Help, Aspen Custom Modeler V7.2 (24.0.0.0063).
40. Stawikowska J., Livingston A.G. Nanoprobe imaging molecular scale pores in polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413-414:1-16.