Solute transport in non-aqueous nanofiltration: Effect of membrane material

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 80, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1371-1377

  Geens, Jeroen ^a   Hillen, An ^a   Bettens, Ben ^a   Van der Bruggen, Bart ^a   Vandecasteele, Carlo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Diffusion; Effective diameter; Polarity; Rejection; Solvation; Solvent resistant nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION EFFECTS; DIFFUSION; ETHANOL; METHANOL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; SOLUBILITY; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

EFFECTIVE DIAMETER; MEMBRANE MATERIALS; NON-AQUEOUS NANOFILTRATION; POLARITY; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; SOLUTE-SOLVENT-MEMBRANE INTERACTIONS; SOLVATION; SOLVENT-RESISTANT NANOFILTRATION;

NANOFILTRATION;

ALCOHOL; METHANOL; SOLVENT;

DIFFUSION; ETHANOL; MEMBRANE; METHANOL; NANOFILTRATION;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; FORCE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; MOLECULAR SIZE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; POROSITY; SOLUTE; SOLVATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 29444438322     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1337     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Everest WR and Malloy S, Designbuild approach to deep aquifier membrane treatment in Southern California. Desalination 117:149-158 (2000).
2. Cyna B, Chagneau G, Bablon G and Tanghe N, Two years of nanofiltration at the Méry-sur-Oise plant, France. Desalination 147:69-75 (2002).
3. Mulford LA, Taylor JS, Nickerson DM and Chen SS, NF-performance at full and pilot scale. J AWWA 91:67-75 (1999).
4. Nghiem LD, Schäfer AI and Elimelech M, Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. Environ Sci Tech 38:1888-1896 (2004).
5. Van der Bruggen B, Geens J and Vandecasteele C, Influence of organic solvents on the performance of polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Separ Sci Technol 37:783-797 (2002).
6. Van der Bruggen B, Geens J and Vandecasteele C, Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane. Chem Eng Sci 57:2511-2518 (2002).
7. Machado DR, Hasson D and Semiat R, Effects of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I: investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux. J Membr Sci 163:93-102 (1999).
8. Machado DR, Hasson D and Semiat R, Effects of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part II: transport model. J Membr Sci 166:63-69 (2000).
9. White LS, Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 205:191-202 (2002).
10. Yang XJ, Livingston AG and Freitas dos Santos L, Experimental observations of nanofiltration with organic solvents. J Membr Sci 190:45-55 (2001).
11. Luthra SS, Yang X. Freitas dos Santos LM, White LS and Livingston AG, Homogeneous phase transfer catalyst recovery and re-use using solvent resistant membranes. J Membr Sci 201:65-75 (2002).
12. Zwijnenberg HJ, Krosse AM, Ebert K, Peinemann KV and Cuperus FP, Acetone-stable nanofiltration membranes in deacidifying vegetable oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 76:83-87 (1999).
13. Bhanushali D, Kloos S, Kurth C and Bhattacharyya C, Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling. J Membr Sci 189:1-21 (2001).
14. Bhanushali D, Kloos S and Bhattacharyya D, Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute-solvent coupling. J Membr Sci 208:343-359 (2002).
15. Tsuru T, Sudoh T, Kawahara SI, Yoshioka T and Asaeda M, Nanofiltration in non-aqueous solutions by porous silica-zirconia membranes. J Membr Sci 185:253-261 (2001).
16. 2 multilayer membranes for applications in non-polar organic solvents. J Membr Sci 224:3-10 (2003).
17. Vankelecom IFJ, De Smet K, Gevers LEM, Livingston A, Nair D, Aerts S, Kuypers S and Jacobs PA, Physico-chemical interpretation of the SRNF transport mechanism for solvents through dense silicone membranes. J Membr Sci 231:99-108 (2004).
18. Robinson JP, Tarleton ES, Millington CR and Nijmeijer A, Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 230:29-37 (2004).
19. Wijmans JG and Baker RW, The solution-diffusion model: a review. J Membr Sci 107:1-21 (1995).
20. Geens J, Peeters K, Van der Bruggen B and Vandecasteele C, Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures: influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection. J Membr Sci 255:255-264 (2005).
21. Geankoplis CJ, Molecular mass transport phenomena in liquids, in Mass Transport Phenomena, Ohio State University Bookstore, Ohio, pp 124-130 (1984).
22. Bird RB, Stewart WE and Lightfoot EN, Diffusivity and the mechanisms of mass transport, in Transport Phenomena, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, pp 513-542 (2002).
23. Geens J, Van der Bruggen B and Vandecasteele C, Characterisation of the solvent stability of polymeric nanofiltration membranes by measurement of contact angles and swelling. Chem Eng Sci 59:1161-1164 (2004).
24. Braeken L, Ramaekers R, Zhang Y, Maes G, Van der Bruggen B and Vandecasteele C, Influence of hydrophobicity on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. J Membr Sci 252:195-203 (2005).
25. Matsuura T and Sourirajan S, Reverse osmosis transport through capillary pores under the influence of surface forces. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 20:373-282 (1981).