Agreement between event-based and trend-based glaucoma progression analyses

Eye (Basingstoke)

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 803-808

  Rao, H L ^a   Kumbar, T ^a   Kumar, A U ^a   Babu, J G ^a   Senthil, S ^a   Garudadri, C S ^a  

^a L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Agreement; Event based progression analysis; Glaucoma progression; Trend based progression analysis; Visual field index; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISEASE COURSE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT MONITORING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 84880254973     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.77     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2144-2153.
2. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 343-353.
3. Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 249-253.
4. Rao HL, Addepalli UK, Jonnadula GB, Kumbar T, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Relationship between intraocular pressure and rate of visual field progression in treated glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2012; e-pub ahead of print 16 May 2012; doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318259b0c2.
5. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd edn. Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1999.
6. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1981. pp 212-236.
7. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
8. Vesti E, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC. Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3873-3879.
9. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, Douglas GR, LeBlanc RP, Mills RP et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 619-623.
10. Katz J, Congdon N, Friedman DS. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 1137-1142.
11. Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Arnalich- Montiel F, Perez-Lopez M, Fernandez-Buenaga R. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1576-1579.
12. Diaz-Aleman VT, Anton A, de la Rosa MG, Johnson ZK, McLeod S, Azuara-Blanco A. Detection of visual-field deterioration by glaucoma progression analysis and threshold noiseless trend programs. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 322-328.
13. Bergea B, Bodin L, Svedbergh B. Impact of intraocular pressure regulation on visual fields in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 997-1004; discussion 1004-1005.
14. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1400-1407.
15. Arnalich-Montiel F, Casas-Llera P, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G. Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 247: 391-397.
16. Koucheki B, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Patel G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J. Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 1022-1028.
17. Carrillo MM, Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Effect of cataract extraction on the visual fields of patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 929-932.
18. Rehman Siddiqui MA, Khairy HA, Azuara-Blanco A. Effect of cataract extraction on SITA perimetry in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2007; 16: 205-208.
19. Rao HL, Jonnadula GB, Addepalli UK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Effect of cataract extraction on visual field index in Glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2013; 22: 164-168.
20. Boden C, Blumenthal EZ, Pascual J, McEwan G, Weinreb RN, Medeiros F et al. Patterns of glaucomatous visual field progression identified by three progression criteria. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 1029-1036.
21. Pascual JP, Schiefer U, Paetzold J, Zangwill LM, Tavares IM, Weinreb RN et al. Spatial characteristics of visual field progression determined by Monte Carlo simulation: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 1642-1650.
22. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial G. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81: 286-293.
23. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goni FJ, Rossetti L, Bengtsson B, Viswanathan AC et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 569-573.
24. Ang GS, Mustafa MS, Scott N, Diaz-Aleman VT, Azuara-Blanco A. Perimetric progression in open angle glaucoma and the visual field index (VFI). J Glaucoma 2011; 20: 223-227.
25. Katz J, Gilbert D, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1017-1025.
26. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 1419-1428.