Relationship between intraocular pressure and rate of visual field progression in treated glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 719-724

  Rao, Harsha L ^a,b   Addepalli, Uday K ^a   Jonnadula, Ganesh B ^a   Kumbar, Tukaram ^a   Senthil, Sirisha ^a   Garudadri, Chandra S ^a  

^a VST Glaucoma Center   (India)

^b L V PRASAD EYE INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

intraocular pressure; intraocular pressure fluctuation; rate of progression; visual field index

Indexed keywords

ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENT; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA SURGERY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATE OF VISUAL FIELD PROGRESSION; RISK FACTOR; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL FIELD INDEX; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; AGED; DISEASE COURSE; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRABECULECTOMY; VERY ELDERLY; VISION DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; TRABECULECTOMY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890554313     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318259b0c2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109: 1090-1095
2. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130: 429-440
3. Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108: 1943-1953
4. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-Angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120: 701-713
5. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: The early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121: 48-56
6. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Diurnal IOP fluctuation: Not an independent risk factor for glaucomatous visual field loss in high-risk ocular hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243: 513-518
7. Bengtsson B, Leske MC, Hyman L, et al. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 205-209
8. Inatani M, Iwao K, Inoue T, et al. Long-Term relationship between intraocular pressure and visual field loss in primary open-Angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17: 275-279
9. De Moraes CG, Juthani VJ, Liebmann JM, et al. Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129: 562-568
10. Bergea B, Bodin L, Svedbergh B. Impact of intraocular pressure regulation on visual fields in open-Angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1999;106: 997-1004
11. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, et al. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2000;9: 134-142
12. Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Sharpe ED, et al. Factors associated with long-Term progression or stability in primary open-Angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130: 274-279
13. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, et al. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111: 1627-1635
14. Caprioli J, Coleman AL. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 1123-1129
15. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, et al. Intraocular pressure control and long-Term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 1766-1773
16. Palmberg P. What is it about pressure that really matters in glaucoma? Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 203-204
17. Caprioli J. Intraocular pressure fluctuation: An independent risk factor for glaucoma? Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125: 1124-1125
18. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145: 343-353
19. Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, et al. Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 249-253
20. Medeiros FA, Alencar LM, Sample PA, et al. The relationship between intraocular pressure reduction and rates of progressive visual field loss in eyes with optic disc hemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 2010;117: 2061-2066
21. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1999: 121-136
22. Glynn RJ, Rosner B. Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110: 381-387
23. Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for clustercorrelated data. Biometrics. 2000;56: 645-646
24. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, et al. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: Design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999;106: 2144-2153
25. Rao HL, Jonnadula GB, Addepalli UK, et al. Effect of cataract extraction on visual field index in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2011; In Press
26. Ang GS, Shunmugam M, Azuara-Blanco A. Effect of cataract extraction on the glaucoma progression index (GPI) in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2010;19: 275-278
27. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, et al. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120: 1136-1141
28. Aoki Y, Takahashi G, Kitahara K. Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007; 17: 196-202