Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: Comparison in a glaucoma population

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 93, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1576-1579

  Casas Llera, P ^a   Rebolleda, G ^a   Munoz Negrete F J ^a   Arnalich Montiel, F ^a   Perez Lopez M ^a   Fernandez Buenaga R ^a  

^a HOSPITAL RAMÓN Y CAJAL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 72449150598     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.158097     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Giangiacomo A, Garway-Heath D, Caprioli J. Diagnosing glaucoma progression: current practice and promising technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:153-162 (Pubitemid 43790811)
2. Birch MK, Wishart PK, O'Donnell NP. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1227-1234
3. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268-1279
4. Spry PG, Johnson CA. Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:158-173 (Pubitemid 34256411)
5. Diaz Aleman VT, Anton A, Gonzalez de la Rosa M, et al. Detection of visual field deterioration by glaucoma progression analysis and threshold noiseless trend programs. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:322-328
6. Caprioli J. The importance of rates in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:191-192
7. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Gaasterland D, et al. Prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:4346-4351 (Pubitemid 39564659)
8. Arnalich-Montiel F, Casas-Llera P, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, et al. Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:391-397
9. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;145:343-353
10. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, et al. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2144-2153 (Pubitemid 30194238)
11. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J, et al. Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:204-208 (Pubitemid 19055338)
12. Katz J. A comparison of the pattern- and total deviation-based glaucoma change. Probability programs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1012-1016
13. Boden C, Blumenthal EZ, Pascual J, et al. Patterns of glaucomatous visual field progression identified by three progression criteria. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:1029-1036 (Pubitemid 40040020)