Values at stake: Autonomy, responsibility, and trustworthiness in relation to genetic testing and personalized nutrition advice

Genes and Nutrition

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 365-372

  Nordström, Karin ^a   Juth, Niklas ^b   Kjellström, Sofia ^c   Meijboom, Franck L B ^d   Görman, Ulf ^a,e  

^a JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Ethics; Personalized nutrition; Responsibility; Trustworthiness

Indexed keywords

GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INDIVIDUALIZATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NUTRIGENOMICS; NUTRITION; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; NUTRITIONAL HEALTH; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSONALIZED NUTRITION; REVIEW; TRUST;

EID: 84879686320     PISSN: 15558932     EISSN: 18653499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12263-013-0337-7     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Ahlgren J, Nordgren A, Perrudin M, Ronteltap A, Savigny J, van Trijp H, Görman U, Nordström K (2013) Consumers on the internet - ethical and legal aspects of commercialization of personalized nutrition. Genes Nutr (this issue)
2. Becker LC (1996) Trust as noncognitive security about motives. Ethics 107:43-61
3. Bouwman LI, Hiddink GJ, Korthals M, Vam't Veer P, van Woerkum C (2005) Personalized nutrition communication through ICT application: how to overcome the gap between potential effectiveness and reality. Eur J Clin Nutr 59:108-116
4. Cullati S, Courvoisier DS, Charvet-Berard AI, Perneger TV (2011) Desire for autonomy in health care decisions: a general population survey. Patient Educ Couns 83(1):134-138
5. Dawson TL, Gabrielian S (2003) Developing conceptions of authority and contract across the lifespan: two perspectives. Dev Rev 23(2):162-218
6. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1973) Attribution of responsibility: theoretical note. J Exp Soc Psychol 9(2):148-153
7. Gast HL (1983) The relationship between stages of ego development and developmental stages of health self care operations. Texas Woman's University, Texas
8. Görman U (2006) Ethical issues raised by personalized nutrition based on genetic information. Genes Nutr 1(1):13-22
9. Görman U, Mathers JC, Grimaldi KA, Ahlgren J, Nordström K (2013) Do we know enough? A scientific and ethical analysis of the basis for genetic based personalized nutrition. Genes Nutr (this issue)
10. Juth N (2005) Genetic information: values and rights. The morality of presymptomatic genetic testing. Acta Philosophica Gothoburgensia, Göteborg
11. Juth N, Munthe C (2011) The ethics of screening in health care and medicine - serving society or serving the patient?. Springer, Dordrecht
12. Kajanne A (2003) Structure and content: the relationship between reflective judgment and laypeople's viewpoints. J Adult Dev 10(3):173-188
13. Kajanne A, Pirttila-Backman A-M (1999) Laypeople's viewpoints about the reasons for expert controversy regarding food additives. Pub Underst Sci 8(4):303-315. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/303
14. Kjellström S (2005) Ansvar, hälsa och människa: en studie av idéer om individens ansvar för sin hälsa (Responsibility, health and the individual: a study of ideas on personal responsibility for health). Linköping University, Linköping
15. Kjellström S, Ross SN (2011) Older persons reasoning about responsibility for health: variations and predictions. Int J Aging Human Dev 72(2):99-124
16. Komduur RH, Korthals M, te Molder H (2009) The good life: living for health and a life without risks? On a prominent script of nutrigenomics. Br J Nutr 101:307-316
17. Lewis JD, Weigert A (1985) Trust as a social reality. Soc Forces 63(4):967-985
18. Locke J [1689] (1988) Two treatises of government. In: Laslett P (ed) Cambridge University Press, New York
19. Loevinger J, Blasi A (1976) Ego development: conceptions and theories, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
20. Mantler J, Schellenberg EG, Page JS (2003) Attributions for serious Illness: are controllability, responsibility, and blame different constructs? Can J Behav Sci 35(2):142-152
21. Marckmann G (2010) Präventionsmaßnahmen im Spannungsfeld zwischen individueller Autonomie und allgemeinem Wohl (Prevention: the ethical tension between individual autonomy and population health). Ethik Med 22(3):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s00481-010-0077-9
22. Meijboom FLB (2007) Trust, food and health. Questions of trust at the interface between food and health. J Agric Env Ethics 20(3):231-245
23. Meijboom FLB (2008) Problems of trust: a question of trustworthiness. An ethical inquiry of trust and trustworthiness in the context of the agricultural and food sector. Utrecht University, Utrecht
24. Mill JS [1859] (1974) On liberty. Penguin Books, Suffolk
25. Nordström K (2009) Autonomie und Erziehung. Eine ethische Studie (Autonomy and education. An ethical study). Karl Alber, Freiburg
26. Sacks G, Veerman GL, Moodie M, Swinburn B (2011) 'Traffic-light' nutrition labelling and 'junk-food' tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. Int J Obes 35:1001-1009
27. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R (2006) Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns 60(2):102-114
28. Shiloh S (1996) Decision-making in the context of genetic risk. In: Marteau T, Richards M (eds) The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 82-103
29. Smed S (2012) Financial penalties on foods: the fat tax in Denmark. Brit Nutr Found Nutr Bull 37:142-147
30. Stewart-Knox BJ, Bunting BP, Gilpin S et al (2009) Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers. Br J Nutr 101:982-989
31. Tiffin R, Arnoult M (2011) The public health impacts of a fat tax. Eur J Clin Nutr 65:427-433