Effects of scientific information format on the comprehension self-monitoring processes: Question generation;Efectos del formato en que se presenta la información científica sobre la autorregulación de los procesos de comprensión: La generación de preguntas

Revista de Psicodidactica

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 293-311

  Sanjosé, Vicente ^a   Torres, Tarcilo ^b   Soto, Carlos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Experimental devices; Question generation; Science education; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879513854     PISSN: 11361034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.4623     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barsalou, L.W. (2012). The human conceptual system. En M. J. Spivey, K. Mcrae, y M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp 239-258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Chandler, P., y Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.
3. Chin, C. (2002). Student-generated questions: Encouraging inquisitive minds in learning science. Teaching and Learning, 23(1), 59-67.
4. Chin, C., y Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. doi:10.1080/03057260701828101.
5. Chinn, C. A., y Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218. doi: 10.1002/sce.10001.
6. Costa, J., Caldeira, M. H., Gallástegui, J. R., y Otero, J. (2000). An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 602-614. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736 (200008)37: 6<602::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-N.
7. Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 197-210. doi:10.1080/0022027880200301.
8. Dillon, J. T. (1990). The practice of questioning. New York: Routledge.
9. Echevarría, M. A. (2006). ¿Enseñar a leer en la Universidad? Una intervención para mejorar la comprensión de textos complejos al comienzo de la educación superior. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 11(2), 169-188.
10. Ferguson, E. L., y Hegarty, M. (1995). Learning with real machines or diagrams: application of knowledge to real-world problems. Cognition and Instruction, 13(1), 129-160. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1301_4.
11. Flammer, A. (1981). Towards a theory of question asking. Psychological Research, 43, 407-420. doi: 10.1007/bf00309225.
12. Gangoso, Z. (2004). Un modelo para el proceso de resolución de problemas en Física. Actas II Jornadas de Investigación en Resolución de Problemas en Física. Córdoba (Argentina).
13. García-Ros, R., y Pérez-González, F. (2011). Validez predictiva e incremental de las habilidades de autorregulación sobre el éxito académico en la universidad. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 16(2), 231-250.
14. Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H., y Emerson, M. (1987). Students' passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181-199. doi: 10.2307/2112275.
15. Graesser, A. C., y Bertus, E. L. (1998). The construction of causal inferences while reading expository texts on science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 247-269. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_4.
16. Graesser, A. C., y Olde, B. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 524-536. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.524.
17. Graesser, A. C., y Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137. doi:10.3102/00028312031001104.
18. Graesser, A. C., y Zwaan, R. A. (1995). Inference generation and the construction of situation models. En C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, y C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Strategies and processing revisited. Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 117-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Greeno, J. G. (1989). Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. En D. Klahr, y K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon (pp. 285-318). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Höffler, T. N., y Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013.
21. Hofstein, A., y Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106.
22. Ishiwa, K., Sanjosé, V., y Otero, J. (2012). Questioning and reading goals: Information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions. Accepted for publication in the British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02079.x
23. Llorens, A. C., y Cerdán, R. (2012). Assessing the comprehension of questions in task-oriented reading. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 17(2), 233-252. doi: 10.1387/rev.psicodidact.4496.
24. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. En R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Millis, K., y Graesser, A. (1994). The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 583-599. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1028.
27. Miyake, N., y Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357-364. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90200-7.
28. Otero, J. (2009). Question generation and anomaly detection in texts. En D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, y A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 47-59). New York: Routledge.
29. Otero, J., y Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 143-175. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_01.
30. Otero J., Ishiwa, K., y Sanjosé, V. (2008). Readers' questioning: Some hints for automated question generation. Workshop on the question generation shared task and evaluation challenge. September 25-26, NSF, Arlington, VA.
31. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., y Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221. doi:10.3102/00346543066002181.
32. Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. En R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Torres, T., Duque, J. K., Ishiwa, K., Sánchez, G., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., y Sanjose, V. (2012). Preguntas de los estudiantes de educación secundaria ante dispositivos experimentales. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(1), 49-60.
34. Trabasso, T., y Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287. doi:10.1080/01638539609544959.
35. Van der Meij, H. (1990). Question asking: To know that you do not know is not enough. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 505-512. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.505.
36. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., y Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249-294. doi: 10.3102/00346543063003249.
37. Watts, M., Gould, G., y Alsop, S. (1997). Questions of understanding: categorising pupils, questions in science. School Science Review, 79(286), 57-63.
38. Woolnough, B. E., y Allsop, T. (1985). Practical work in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.