Linear discriminant functions to improve the glaucoma probability score analysis to detect glaucomatous optic nerve heads: A multicenter study

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 73-79

  Iester, Michele ^a,f   Oddone, Francesco ^b   Prato, Mirko ^a   Centofanti, Marco ^b,c   Fogagnolo, Paolo ^b   Rossetti, Luca ^d   Vaccarezza, Valeria ^a   Manni, Gianluca ^b,c   Ferreras, Antonio ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^e HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Confocal scanning laser; Disc area; Discriminant analysis formula; Glaucoma; Heidelberg Retina Tomography; Stage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA PROBABILITY SCORE; HUMAN; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION FORMULA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CLASSIFICATION; GONIOSCOPY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PROBABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

AREA UNDER CURVE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL FIELD TESTS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84879455595     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31823298b3     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Coleman AL. Glaucoma. Lancet. 1999;354:1803-1810.
2. Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, et al. Prevent blindness America visual field screening study: the Prevent America Glaucoma Advisory Committee. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 40:41-44.
3. Harwerth RS, Crauford ML, Frishman LJ, et al. Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Prog Ret Eye Res. 2002;21:91-125.
4. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
5. Curcio CA, Owsley C, Skalka HW, et al. Topography of retinal cells and visual sensitivity in the same human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:777.
6. Pederson JE, Anderson DR. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;58:14-19.
7. Reus NJ, de Graaf M, Lemij HG. Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:313-318.
8. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Swindale NV, et al. ROC analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc shape measures in Glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1997;32:382-388.
9. Swindale NV, Chin A, Mikelberg FS. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1730-1742.
10. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmol. 2002;109:1072-1077.
11. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827-837.
12. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Module. Operating instructions software version 3.0. Heidelberg. Germany: Heidelberg Engineering; 2005.
13. Oddone F, Centofanti M, Rossetti L, et al. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1358-1365.
14. Oddone F, Centofanti M, Iester M, et al. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:1106-1111.
15. Ferreras A, Pajarin AB, Polo V, et al. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1981-1987.
16. Moreno-Montañés J, Antón A, García N, et al. Glaucoma probability score Versus Moorfields classification in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:360-368.
17. Ferreras A, Pablo LE, Pajarín AB, et al. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:354 -359.
18. Rao HL, Babu GJ, Sekhar GC. Comparison of the diagnostic capability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomographs 2 and 3 for glaucoma in the Indian population. Ophthalmology. 2010;117: 275-281.
19. Quigley HA II. Changes in the appearance of the optic disc. Surv Ophthalmol. 1985;30:117-126.
20. Quigley HA, Dunkelberg GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmology. 1989;107:453-456.
21. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2393-2401.
22. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Swindale NV, et al. ROC analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc shape measure in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1997;32:382-388.
23. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma. 1995;4:242-247.
24. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121-127.
25. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
26. Bowd C, Chan K, Zangwill LM, et al. Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3444-3454.
27. Iester M, Mardin CY, Budde WM, et al. Discriminant analysis formulas of optic nerve head parameters measured by confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:97-104.
28. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1145-1150.
29. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, et al. Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:466-471.
30. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, et al. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1730-1742.
31. Tsai CS, Zangwill L, Gonzalez C, et al. Ethnic differences in optic nerve head topography. J Glaucoma. 1995;4:248-257.
32. Jonas JB, Konigsreuther KA. Optic disk appearance in ocular hypertensive eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:732-740.
33. Zangwill LM, Van Horn S, De Souza Lima M, et al. Optic nerve head topography in ocular hypertensive eyes using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:520-525.
34. Iester M, Broadway DC, Mikelberg FS, et al. A comparison of normal, ocular hypertension and glaucomatous optic disc topographic parameters. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:363-370.
35. Caprioli J, Miller JM. Optic disc area is related to disc size in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1683-1685.
36. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, et al. Variability of the real dimensions of normal human optic discs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:332-336.
37. Reus NJ, Lemij HG, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic disc photographs for glaucoma: the European Optic Disc Assessment trial (EODAT). Ophtalmology. 2010;117:717-723.
38. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:545-548.
39. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008 -1015.
40. Zangwill LM, Jain S, Racette L, et al. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2653-2660.
41. Heiji A, Molder H. Optic disc diameter influences the ability to detect glaucomatous disc damage. Acta Ophthalmol. 1993;71:122-129.
42. Rolando M, Macrì A, Altieri M, et al.Morphometric analysis of the optic disc surface. The level of smoothness as a diagnostic parameter for glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 1997;20:15-20.
43. Caprioli J, Park HJ, Ugurlu S, et al. Slope of the peripapillary nerve fiber layer surface in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2321-2328.
44. Rolando M, Macrì A, Iester M. Optic disc surface smoothness and visual field indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:372-376.
45. Iester M, Zanini M, Vittone P, et al. Detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head by using Heidelberg topographic maps. Eye. 2007;21:609-613.