Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 Diagnostic Accuracy across Disc Sizes and Glaucoma Stages. A Multicenter Study

Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Oddone, Francesco ^a   Centofanti, Marco ^a,b   Rossetti, Luca ^c   Iester, Michele ^d   Fogagnolo, Paolo ^a   Capris, Elisabetta ^d   Manni, Gianluca ^a,b  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANALYZER; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LINEAR SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETINA; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 48149093162     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Miglior S., Guareschi M., Albe' E., et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol 136 (2003) 26-33
2. Miglior S., Guareschi M., Zanchi S., et al. Diagnostic value for glaucoma of a new HRT analysis correcting for disc size. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 236 (2002) 44
3. Reus N.J., de Graaf M., and Lemij H.G. Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 91 (2007) 313-318
4. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., and Weinreb R.N. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 827-837
5. Andreou P.A., Wickremasinghe S.S., Asaria R.H., et al. A comparison of HRT II and GDx imaging for glaucoma detection in a primary care eye clinic setting. Eye 21 (2007) 1050-1055
6. Iester M., Mikelberg F.S., Swindale N.V., and Drance S.M. ROC analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc shape measures in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 32 (1997) 382-388
7. Ferreras A., Pajarin A.B., Polo V., et al. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg retina tomograph 3 classifications. Glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 1981-1987
8. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 1008-1015
9. Zangwill L.M., Jain S., Racette L., et al. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg retina tomograph glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 (2007) 2653-2660
10. Mardin C.Y., and Horn F.K. Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236 (1998) 641-645
11. Iester M., Mikelberg F.S., and Drance S.M. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 104 (1997) 545-548
12. Burgansky-Eliash Z., Wollstein G., Bilonick R.A., et al. Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 466-471
13. Pueyo V., Polo V., Larrosa J.M., et al. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph, optical coherence tomograph, and scanning laser polarimeter in open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 16 (2007) 173-177
14. Zhou X.H. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy. Stat Methods Med Res 7 (1998) 337-353
15. Medeiros F.A., Ng D., Zangwill L.M., et al. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 (2007) 214-222
16. Garway-Heath D.F., and Hitchings R.A. Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology. Br J Ophthalmol 82 (1998) 986
17. Harizman N., Zelefsky J.R., Ilitchev E., et al. Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph-III. Br J Ophthalmol 90 (2006) 1390-1392
18. Coops A., Henson D.B., Kwartz A.J., and Artes P.H. Automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 5348-5355
19. Ford B.A., Artes P.H., McCormick T.A., et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1145-1150
20. Deleon-Ortega J.E., Arthur S.N., McGwin Jr. G., et al. Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 3374-3380
21. Kesen M.R., Spaeth G.L., Henderer J.D., et al. The Heidelberg retina tomograph vs clinical impression in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 133 (2002) 613-616