Clinical Assessment of Stereoscopic Optic Disc Photographs for Glaucoma: The European Optic Disc Assessment Trial

Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 717-723

  Reus, Nicolaas J ^a   Lemij, Hans G ^a   Garway Heath, David F ^b   Airaksinen, P Juhani ^c   Anton, Alfonso ^d   Bron, Alain M ^e   Faschinger, Christoph ^f   Holló, Gábor ^g   Iester, Michele ^h   Jonas, Jost B ⁱ   Mistlberger, Andrea ^j   Topouzis, Fotis ^k   Zeyen, Thierry G ^l  

^a ROTTERDAM EYE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^d Institut Catala de Retina   (Spain)

^e DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^g SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^h UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^j Private Clinic   (Austria)

^k ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^l UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EUROPE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 77949875422     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.026     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Varma R., Steinmann W.C., and Scott I.U. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 99 (1992) 215-221
2. Abrams L.S., Scott I.U., Spaeth G.L., et al. Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 101 (1994) 1662-1667
3. Greaney M.J., Hoffman D.C., Garway-Heath D.F., et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 140-145
4. Wollstein G., Garway-Heath D.F., Fontana L., and Hitchings R.A. Identifying early glaucomatous changes: comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 2272-2277
5. Girkin C.A., McGwin Jr. G., Long C., et al. Subjective and objective optic nerve assessment in African Americans and whites. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 2272-2278
6. Reus N.J., de Graaf M., and Lemij H.G. Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 91 (2007) 313-318
7. Hodapp E., Parrish II R.K., and Anderson D.R. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma (1993), Mosby, St. Louis, MO 52-61
8. Weinreb R.N., Dreher A.W., Coleman A., et al. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 108 (1990) 557-560
9. Reus N.J., and Lemij H.G. Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx VCC for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1860-1865
10. Weinreb R.N., Dreher A.W., and Bille J.F. Quantitative assessment of the optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Int Ophthalmol 13 (1989) 25-29
11. Wollstein G., Garway-Heath D.F., and Hitchings R.A. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 1557-1563
12. Bathija R., Zangwill L., Berry C.C., et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma 7 (1998) 121-127
13. Altman D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research (1991), Chapman and Hall, London 406-407
14. DeLong E.R., DeLong D.M., and Clarke-Pearson D.L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44 (1988) 837-845
15. Tielsch J.M., Sommer A., Katz J., et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 266 (1991) 369-374
16. Mitchell P., Smith W., Attebo K., and Healey P.R. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 103 (1996) 1661-1669
17. Leske M.C., Connell A.M., Schachat A.P., Hyman L., and Barbados Eye Study Group. The Barbados Eye Study: Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 112 (1994) 821-829
18. Coffey M., Reidy A., Wormald R., et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol 77 (1993) 17-21
19. Dielemans I., Vingerling J.R., Wolfs R.C., et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands: the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 101 (1994) 1851-1855
20. Wong E.Y., Keeffe J.E., Rait J.L., et al. Detection of undiagnosed glaucoma by eye health professionals. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1508-1514
21. Topouzis F., Coleman A.L., Harris A., et al. Factors associated with undiagnosed open-angle glaucoma: the Thessaloniki Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 145 (2008) 327-335
22. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., and Weinreb R.N. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122 (2004) 827-837