The conditioning role of state higher education governance structures

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 506-539

  Tandberg, David A ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879395253     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2013.0026     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adams, J. S. (1976) The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. in m. dunette (Ed.), Handbook of organizational and industrial psychology (pp. 1175-1199). chicago: Rand mcNally.
2. Aldritch, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217-230.
3. Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2006). State higher education spending and the tax revolt. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 618-643.
4. Barrilleaux, C., & Berkman, M. (2003). Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policy making. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 409-417.
5. Barrilleaux, C., & Bernick E. (2003). Deservingness, discretion, and the state politics of welfare spending, 1990-96. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3(1), 1-22.
6. Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the american states, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 337-348.
7. Beyle, T. (2003). The governors. in v. Gray & R. R. hanson (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (8th ed., pp. 194-231). washington, dc: cQ press.
8. th ed., pp. 192-228). washington, dc: cQ press.
9. Borghers, E., & Wessa, P. (2006). Online econometrics textbook: Statistics-econometrics-forecasting. Retrieved from http://www.xycoon.com/
10. Brown, W. (1996). Systems, boundaries, and information fow. The Academy of Management Journal, 9(4), 318-327.
11. Carey, J. M., Niemi, R. G., & Powell, L. W. (2000). Incumbency and the probability of reelection in state legislative elections. Journal of Politics, 62, 671-700.
12. Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. (1982). The control of the campus: A report on the governance of higher education. princeton, NJ: princeton University press.
13. Chubb, J. E. (1988). Institutions, the economy, and the dynamics of state elections. American Political Science Review, 82(1), 133-154.
14. Council on Governmental Ethics laws [cGEl]. (1980-1992). Blue book. Sacramento, ca: author.
15. Council of State Governments [cSG]. (1977-2005). The book of the states. lexington, ky: author.dar, l., & Spence, m. J. (2011). partisanship, political polarization, and state budget outcomes: the case of higher education. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1577365
16. Dometrius, N. C. (1987). Changing gubernatorial power: the measure vs. reality. Western Political Quarterly, 40(2), 319-328.
17. Doyle, W. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: an event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(3), 259-285.
18. Education commission of the States. (1976-1986). State postsecondary education profles handbook. denver, colorado: author.
19. Education commission of the States. (2006). Postsecondary governance structures database. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/html/issuespS.asp
20. Fennell, M., & Alexander, J. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments, The Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 456-476.
21. Fiorina, M. (1994). Divided government in the american states: a byproduct of legislative professionalism? American Political Science Review, 88, 304-316.
22. Glenny, L. A. (1959). Autonomy of public colleges: the challenge of coordination. New york: mcGraw-hill.
23. Glenny, L. A. (1970). Institutional autonomy for whom? in G. k. Smith (Ed.), The troubled campus: Current issues in higher education (pp. 153-160). washington, dc: aahE.
24. Gove, S. K., & Carpenter, J. (1977). State lobbying for higher education. Educational Record, 58(4), 357-373.
25. Gray V., & Lowery D. (1999). The population ecology of interest representation: Lobbying communities in the American states. ann arbor, mi: University of michigan press.
26. th ed). New york: prentice hall.
27. Guston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between U.S. politics and science: the role of the offce of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29(1), 87-112.
28. Guston, D. H. (2000). Between politics and science: Credibility on the line. New york: cambridge University press.
29. Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399-408.
30. Guston, D., Jones, M., & Branscomb, L. M. (1997). The demand for and supply of technical information and analysis in state legislatures. Policy Studies Journal, 25(3), 451-469.
31. Hayes, S. P. (1996). Influences on re-invention during the diffusion of innovations. Political Research Quarterly, 49(3), 631-650.
32. Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 161-190.
33. Hearn, J. C., Griswold, C., & Marine, G. (1996). Region, resources, reason: a contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 241-278.
34. Heinz, J. P., lauman, E. O., Nelson, R. L., & Salisbury, R. H. (1993). The hollow core: Private interests in national policy making. cambridge: harvard University press.
35. Hendrick, R. M., & Garand, J. C. (1991). Expenditure tradeoffs in the U.S. states: a pooled analysis. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 1(3), 295-318.
36. Hossler, D., Lund, J. P., Ramin, J., Westfall, S., & Irish, S. (1997). State funding for higher education: the sisyphean task. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(2), 160-188.
37. Jacoby, W. G., & Schneider, S. K. (2001). Variability in state policy priorities: an empirical analysis. The Journal of Politics, 63(2), 544-568.
38. Jensen, A. N. (2003). Correlation analysis. Retrieved from http://www.csus.edu/indiv/j/jensena/mgmt105/correl01.htm
39. King, J. E. (2003). Status of the pell grant report. washington, dc: american council on Education.
40. Lowry, R. C. (2001). Governmental structure, trustee selection, and public university prices and spending. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 845-861.
41. McGuinness, A. (1988-1997). State postsecondary education structures handbook. denver, colorado: Education commission of the States.
42. McGuinness, A. (2003). Models of postsecondary education and governance in the States. denver, co: Education commission of the States.
43. McLendon, M. K. (2003a). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(5), 479-515.
44. McLendon, M. K. (2003b). State governance reform of higher education: patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. in J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (vol. 18, pp. 57-143). london: kluwer.
45. McLendon, M. K., Deaton, S. B., & Hearn, J. C. (2007). The enactment of reforms in state governance of higher education: testing the political instability hypothesis. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 645-675.
46. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1-24.
47. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Mokher, C. G. (2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: the role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 686-713.
48. McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 363-400.
49. McLendon, M. K., Mokher, C. G., & Doyle, W. (2009). Privileging public research universities: the political economy of state appropriations to higher education. Journal of Education Finance, 34(4), 372-401.
50. McLendon, M. K., & Ness, E. C. (2009). The politics of state higher education governance reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), 66-88.
51. Mortenson, T. G. (2005). State tax fund appropriations for higher education 1961 to 2005. oskaloosa, ia: postsecondary Education opportunity.
52. National Association of State Budget Officers [NASBO]. (1977-2002). Budget processes of the states. denver, co: author.
53. National center for Education Statistics [NcES]. (1977-2005). Digest of Education Statistics. washington, dc: author.
54. National conference of State legislatures [NcSl]. (2006). National conference of State legislatures. Retrieved from www.ncls.org
55. Ness, E. (2010). The role of information in the policy process: implications for the examination of research utilization in higher education policy. in J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (vol. 25, pp. 1-49). london: Springer.
56. Nicholson-crotty, J., & Meier, K. J. (2003). Politics, structure, and public policy: the case of higher education. Educational Policy, 17(1), 80-97.
57. Peterson, R. G. (1976). Environmental and political determinants of state higher education appropriations policies. The Journal of Higher Education, 47(5), 523-542.
58. Rizzo, M. J. (2004). A (less than) zero-sum game? State funding for public higher education: how public higher education institutions have lost. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. ithaca, Ny: cornell University.
59. Rosenthal, A. (1991). Legislative life. New york: harper and Row.
60. Rosenthal, A. (1998). The decline of representative democracy. washington, dc: cQ press.
61. Shakespeare, C. (2008). Uncovering information's role in the state higher education policy-making process. Educational Policy, 22(6), 875-899.
62. SHEEO. (2009). State budgeting for higher education in the United States. Boulder, co: author.
63. Squire, P. (1992). Legislative professionalization and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(1), 69-79.
64. Squire, P. (2000). Uncontested seats in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25(1), 131-146.
65. Squire, P., & Hamm, K. E. (2005). 101 chambers: Congress, state legislatures and the future of legislative studies. columbus, oh: ohio State University press.
66. Tandberg, D. A. (2006). State-level higher education interest group alliances. Higher Education in Review, 3, 25-49.
67. Tandberg, D. A. (2008). The politics of state higher education funding. Higher Education in Review, 5, 1-36.
68. Tandberg, D. A. (2010a). Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51(5), 416-450.
69. Tandberg, D. A. (2010b). Interest groups and governmental institutions: the politics of state funding of public higher education. Educational Policy, 24(5), 735-778.
70. Tandberg, D. A., & Anderson, C. K. (2012). Where politics is a blood sport: Restructuring state higher education governance in massachusetts. Educational Policy, 4(26), 564-591.
71. Tandberg, D. A., & Ness E. (2011). State capital expenditures for higher education: 'where the real politics happens.' Journal of Education Finance, 36(4), 394-423.
72. Trostel, P. A., & Ronca, J. M. (2009). A simple unifying measure of state support for post-secondary education. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 215-247.
73. Truman, D. (1951). The governmental process. knopf: New york.
74. Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer and their antecedents. The Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289-305.
75. Ucla academic technology Services. (2006). Stata FAQ: How can I check for collineari-ty in survey regression? Retrieved from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/svycollin.htm
76. Volkwein, J. F., & Tandberg, D. A. (2008). Measuring up: Examining the connections among state structural characteristics, regulatory practices, and performance. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 180-197.
77. Webber, D. J. (1987). Legislators use of policy information. American Behavioral Scientist, 30, 612-631.
78. Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2006). Examining differences in state support for higher education: a comparative study of state appropriations for Research i universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 935-967.
79. Wiggins, C. W., & Browne, W. P. (1982). Interest groups and public policy within a state legislative setting. Polity, 14, 548-558.
80. Williams, R. (2005). Multicollinearity. Retrieved from http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats2/l11.pdf.
81. Zumeta, W. (1996). Meeting the demand for higher education without breaking the bank. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(4), 367-425.