Region, resources, and reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 241-278

  Hearn, James C ^a   Griswold, Carolyn P ^b   Marine, Ginger M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030166960     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf01730117     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Astin, A. (1978). SISFAP-Study A: The impact of student financial aid programs on student college choice. Report on research supported by the Office of Planning, Budgeting, and Evaluation, U.S. Office of Education, under Contract 300-75-0382. Available as ERIC Document 187 368.
2. Becker, W. E., and Lewis, D. R. (eds.) (1992). The Economics of American Higher Education. Boston: Kluwer Publishers.
3. Bennet, W. (1987). Our greedy colleges. New York Times, February 18, p. A31.
4. Berdahl, R. O. (1971). Statewide Coordination Higher Education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
5. Berger, M. C., and Toma, E. F. (1994). Variation is state education policies and effects on student performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13(3):477-491.
6. Bowen, H. (1971). Finance and the aims of American higher education. In M. D. Orwig (ed.), Financing Higher Education: Alternatives for the Federal Government, pp. 155-170. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
7. Bowen, H. (1974). Financing higher education: The current state of the debate. In Kenneth E. Young (ed.), Exploring the Case for Low Tuition in Public Higher Education, pp. 11-31. Iowa City, IA: American Association of State Colleges and Universities, American Association of Community and Junior Colleges, and the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, in cooperation with the American College Testing Program.
8. Bowen, W., and Breneman, D. (1993). Student aid: Price discount or educational investment? Brookings Review, Winger: 95-97.
9. Brandl, J. E. (1988). The legislative role in policy making for higher education. In S. Gove and T. Beyle (eds.), Governors and Higher Education, pp. 17-20. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
10. Brimelow, P. (1987). The untouchables. Forbes, November 30, pp. 140-150.
11. Cage M. C. (1994, April 13). Holding the tuition line: Private colleges appear to be responding to public pressure to keep costs down. Chronicle of Higher Education 40(32): A31-32.
12. Callan, P. M. (1993). The California higher education policy vacuum. Report No. 93-2, California Higher Education Policy Center. San Jose, CA: California Higher Education Policy Center.
13. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1973). Higher Education: Who Pays? Who Benefits? Who Should Pay? New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education (1975). Low or No Tuition: The Feasibility of a National Policy for the First Two Years of College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1976). The States and Higher Education: A Proud Past and a Vital Future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1982). The Control of the Campus: A Report on the Governance of Higher Education. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Foundation.
17. Chronicle of Higher Education (1991). Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac 38(1): August 28. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Chronicle of Higher Education (1992, March 25). States wrestle with proposals for higher tuition. Chronicle of Higher Education 38(29): A28-29.
19. Chronicle of Higher Education (1992, March 25). States wrestle with proposals for higher tuition. Chronicle of Higher Education 38(29): A28-29.
20. Chronicle of Higher Education (1994, March 16). Ways and means. Chronicle of Higher Education 40(28): A25.
21. Clotfelter, C., Ehrenberg, R., Getz, M., and Siegfried, J. (1991). Economic Challenges in Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Committee on Economic Development (1973). The Management and Financing of Colleges. New York: Committee on Economic Development.
23. Daniere, A. (1964). Higher Education in the American Economy. New York: Random House.
24. Dressel, P. L. (ed.) (1980). The Autonomy of Public Colleges. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Evangelauf, J. (1994, October 5). Tuition rises again. Chronicle of Higher Education 41(6): A41, A49.
26. Finn, C. (1984, May-June). Trying higher education: An eight count indictment. Change 16: 29-33, 47-51.
27. Fischer, F. J. (1990). State financing of higher education: A new look at an old problem. Change 22(1): 42-56.
28. Fiske, E. A. (1987a). How tuition costs are set: An education in itself. New York Times, May 14, pp. 1-11.
29. Fiske, E. A. (1987b). Tuitions at new peak, heating cost debate. New York Times, May 12, p. 13.
30. Floyd, C. E. (1982). State Planning, Budgeting, and Accountability: Approaches for Higher Education. AAHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, No. 6. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
31. Folger, J. K. (1981). Implications of state government changes. In P. Jedamus and M. W. Peterson (eds.), Improving Academic Management: A Handbook of Planning and Institutional Research, pp. 48-64. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Friedman, M. (1968). The higher schooling in America. Public Interest, Spring: 108-112.
33. Garms, W. I. (1986). The determinants of public revenues for higher and lower education: A thirty-year perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 8(3): 277-293.
34. Glazer, J. S. (1984). Terminating entrenched policies in educational institutions: A case history of free tuitions. Review of Higher Education 7(2): 159-173.
35. Glenny, L. A. (1959). Autonomy of Public Colleges: The Challenges of Coordination. New York: McGraw Hill.
36. Greer, D. G. (1992). Not an aid to education. AGB Reports, July/August: 10-13.
37. Griswold, C. P., and Marine, G. M. Political influences on state policy: Higher-tuition, higher-aid and the real world. Review of Higher Education (forthcoming).
38. Guerre, R. P. (1991). Financial aid in higher education: What's wrong, who's being hurt, and what's being done. Journal of College and University Law 17(4): 483-533.
39. Halstead, K. (1991). State Profiles: Financing Public Higher Education - 1978 to 1991. Washington, DC: Research Associates of Washington.
40. Hansen, W. L., and Weisbrod, B. A. (1969). Benefits, Costs, and Finance of Public Higher Education. Chicago: Markham Publishing.
41. Hauptman, A. M. (1990). The College Tuition Spiral: An Examination of Why Charges Are Increasing. Washington, DC: The American Council on Education and The College Board.
42. Healy, P. (1994, December 7). Tough choices on tuition: Public colleges hope efforts to control increases will be rewarded by lawmakers. Chronicle of Higher Education 41(15): A31, A34.
43. Healy, P. (1995, February 10). Tug of war over student aid moves to the state capitals. Chronicle of Higher Education 41(22): A30-31.
44. Hearn, J. C., and Anderson, M. S. (1989). Integrating postsecondary education financing policies: The Minnesota model. In R. H. Fenske (ed.), Studying the Impact of Student Aid on Institutions. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 62, pp. 55-73. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Hearn, J. C., and Griswold, C. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 16(2): 161-190.
46. Hearn, J. C., and Longanecker, D. (1985). Enrollment effects of alternative postsecondary pricing policies. Journal of Higher Education 56(5): 485-508.
47. Herzlinger, R. E., and Jones, F. (1981). Pricing public sector services: The tuition gap. Policy Sciences 13: 419-438.
48. Hines, E. R. (1988). Higher Education and State Governments: Renewed Partnership, Cooperation, or Competition? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, No. 5. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, George Washington University.
49. Hoenack, S. A. (1977). Direct and incentive planning within a university. Socioeconomic Planning Sciences 11: 191-204.
50. Hoenack, S.A., and Pierro, D. J. (1990). An econometic model of a public university's income and enrollments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 14: 403-423.
51. Johnson, G. P., and Leslie, L. L. (1976). Increasing public tuition in higher education: An alternative approach to the equity issue. Educational Administration Quarterly 12(1): 27-42.
52. Johnson, J. L. (1981). Designing state student-aid policies for the 1980s. In L. L. Leslie and J. Hyatt (eds.), Higher Education Financing Policies: States, Institutions, and Their Interaction, pp. 34-40. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
53. Johnstone, D. B. (1992). Tuition fees. In G. Harmon (volume ed.), B. R. Clark, and G. Neave (editors in chief), Encyclopedia of Higher Education, vol. 2, pp. 1501-1509. New York: Pergamon Press.
54. Ketter, R. L. (1975). How much centralization is enough? In R. O. Berdahl (ed.), Evaluating Statewide Boards, pp. 79-85. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 5, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Layzell, D. T., and Lyddon, J. W. (1990). Budgeting for Higher Education at the State Level: Enigma, Paradox, and Ritual. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 4. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, George Washington University.
56. Lenth, C. S. (1993). The Tuition Dilemma - State Policies and Practices in Pricing Public Higher Education. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
57. Lewis, D. R., Boyer, C. M., Bruininks, R. H., and Kallsen, L. A. (1994). The governor's modest proposal: Full-cost tuition. Review of Higher Education 18(1): 95-109.
58. López, M. (1993, April). High tuition, high aid won't work. Chronicle of Higher Education 39: B1, B2.
59. Mazzoni, T. L. (1991). Analyzing state school policymaking: An arena model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 13(2): 115-138.
60. McConnell, T. R. (1962). A General Pattern for American Higher Education. New York: McGraw Hill.
61. McGuinness, A. C., Jr. (1988). State Postsecondary Education Structures Handbook: 1988. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
62. McKeown, M. P. (1982, Summer). State policies on tuition and fees for public higher education. Journal of Education Finance 8: 1-19.
63. McPherson, M. S., and Schapiro, M. O. (1991). Keeping College Affordable: Government and Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
64. Millard, R. M. (1980). Power of state coordinating agencies. In P. Jedamus and M. W. Peterson (eds.), Improving Academic Management: A Handbook of Institutional Planning and Research, pp. 65-95. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65. Millett, J. D. (1975). State coordinating boards and statewide governing boards. In R. O. Berdahl (ed.), Evaluating Statewide Boards, pp. 61-70. New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 2(1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66. Millett, J. D. (1984). Conflict in Higher Education: State Government Coordination Versus Institutional Independence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67. Mingle, J. R. (1992). Low tuition, progressive taxation. AGB Reports, pp. 9-13.
68. Mortimer, K. R., and McConnell, T. R. (1982). Sharing Authority Effectively. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1992a). Digest of Education Statistics, 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
70. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1992b). State Higher Education Profiles, 4th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
71. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1994) The Condition of Education -1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
72. National Commission on Responsibilities for Financing Postsecondary Education (1993). Making College Affordable Again: Final Report. Washington, DC: National Commission on Responsibilities for Financing Postsecondary Education.
73. O'Keefe, M. (1987). Where does the money really go? Change, November/December: 12-34.
74. Ornstein, C. (1994, June 15). States spent $2.5 billion on student aid this year, the most ever. Chronicle of Higher Education 40(41): A28.
75. Palola, E. B., Lehmann, T., and Blischke, W. R. (1970). Higher Education by Design: The Sociology of Planning. Berkeley: University of California.
76. Pechman, J. A. (1970). The distributional effects of public higher education in California. Journal of Human Resources 5(3): 361-370.
77. Peltzman, S. (1973, January-February). The effect of government subsidies-in-kind on private expenditures: The case of higher education. Journal of Political Economy 81: 1-27.
78. Polsby, Nelson W. (1984). Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
79. Reeher, K. R., and Davis, J. S. (1990). National Association of State Scholarship and Grant Programs 20th Annual Survey Report. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency.
80. Reich, R. B. (1991). The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism. New York: Knopf.
81. Rusk, J. J., and Leslie, L. L. (1978). The setting of tuition in public higher education. Journal of Higher Education 49(6): 531-547.
82. St. John, E. P. (1992). Changes in pricing behaviors during the 1980's. Journal of Higher Education 63(2): 165-187.
83. Savage, Robert L. (1978). Policy innovativeness as a trait of American states. Journal of Politics 40 (1):212-224.
84. Stampen, J. (1980). The Financing of Public Higher Education: Low Tuition, Student Aid, and the Federal Government. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
85. State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) (1988). Survey on Tuition Policy, Costs and Student Aid. Denver, CO: SHEEO.
86. Tuma, N. B., and Hannan, M. T. (1984). Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
87. Volkwein, J. F. (1987). State regulation and campus autonomy. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 3, pp. 120-154. New York: Agathon Press.
88. Walker, Jack L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review 63 (3): 880-899.
89. Wallace, T. P. (1992). The inequities of low tuition. AGB Reports, May/June: 24-27.
90. Werth, B. (1988). Why is college so expensive?: Maybe America wants it that way. Change, March/April: 13-25.
91. Whitehead, J. S. (1973). The Separation of Church and State: Columbia, Dartmouth, Harvard, and Yale, 1776-1876. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
92. Wildavsky, A. (1986). Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes, 2nd rev. ed. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
93. Wilson, R. F., and Miller, J. L., Jr. (1980). Private College Participation in Planning and Program Review Activities of Forty-five State-level Higher Education Agencies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Study of Higher Education.
94. Young, K. E. (1974). Exploring the Case for Low Tuition in Public Higher Education. Iowa City, IA: American Association of State Colleges and Universities, American Association of Community and Junior Colleges, National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges, in cooperation with the American College Testing Program.
95. Zapler, M. (1994, November 2). Tuition and training are top college issues in gubernatorial races. Chronicle of Higher Education 41(10): A54.
96. Zumeta, W. (1992). State policies and private higher education. Journal of Higher Education 63(4): 363-417.
97. Zumeta, W. (1994). Emerging choices in state financing policies for higher education: A national perspective. Paper presented at the annual research conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Chicago, October, 1994.