State higher education spending and the tax revolt

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 618-644

  Archibald, Robert B ^a   Feldman, David H ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745292822     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2006.0029     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Abrams, B. A., &. Dougan, W. R. (1986), The effects of constitutional restraints on government spending. Public Choice, 49, 101-116.
2. Alesina, A. (1988) Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational voters. American Economic Review, 78, 796-805.
3. Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2004, October). Direct funding of students at public colleges and universities. NACUBO Business Officer, 27-32.
4. Bails, D., & Tieslau, M. A. (2000). The impact of fiscal constitutions on state and local expenditures. Cato Journal, 20, 255-227.
5. Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 327-348.
6. Besley, T., & Case, A. (2003). Political institutions and policy choices, evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 7-73.
7. Black, E., & Black, M. (2002). The rise of southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443-450.
9. Burdman, P. (2004, Spring). Has the state become an albatross? Some of Virginia's public universities are seeking greater freedom to set tuition. National CrossTalk, 12, 1-4.
10. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. (1973). Higher education: Who pays? Who benefits? Who should pay? New York: McGraw Hill.
11. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
12. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2000). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Friedman, M. (1968). The higher schooling in America. Public Interest, 11, 108-112.
14. Gilligan, T. W., & Matsusaka, J. G. (1995). Deviation from constituent interests: The role of legislative structure and political parties in the states. Economic Inquiry, 33, 383-401.
15. Griswold, C. P., & Marine, G. M. (1996). Political influences on state policy: Higher-Tuition, higher-aid, and the real world. The Review of Higher Education, 19, 361-389.
16. Hansen, W. L., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1969). Benefits, costs, and finance of public higher education. Chicago: Markham.
17. Hauptman, A. M. (1990). The college tuition spiral: An examination of why charges are increasing. Washington, DC: American Council of Education and the College Board.
18. Hearn, J. C., Griswold, C. P., & Marine G. M. (1996). Region, resources, and reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37, 241-278.
19. Hossler, D., Lund, J. P., Ramin, J., Westfall, S., & Irish, S. (1997). State funding for higher education: The Sisyphean task. The Journal of Higher Education, 8, 160-190.
20. Kane, T. J., Orszag, P. R., & Gunter, D. L. (2003). State fiscal constraints and higher education spending: The role of Medicaid and the business cycle (Discussion Paper No. 11). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
21. Knight, B. G. (2000). Supermajority voting requirements for tax increases: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 41-67.
22. Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (2000). State appropriations and higher education tuition: What is the relationship? Education Economics, 8, 81-89.
23. Lamis, A. (1984). The two-party South. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Lowry, R. C. (2001). The effects of state political interests and campus outputs on public university revenues. Economics of Education Review, 20, 105-119.
25. Matsusaka, J. (1995). Fiscal effects of the voter initiative: Evidence from the last 30 years. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 587-623.
26. Romer, T., & Rosenthal, H. (1978). Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice, 33, 27-43.
27. Rueben, K. (1997). Tax limitations and government growth: The effect of state tax and expenditure limits on state and local government. Unpublished manuscript, California Institute of Public Policy.
28. Russo, A. (2004, June). Varsity vouchers: Colorado has come up with a novel way to fund higher education. Send money to the students. State Legislatures, 27.
29. Shadbegian, R. J. (1996). Do tax and expenditure limitations affect the size and growth of state government? Contemporary Economic Policy, 14, 22-36.
30. Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. (1981). Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice. Public Choice, 37, 503-519.
31. Skocpol, T. (1995). Targeting within universalism, politically viable policies to combat poverty in the United States. In T. Skocpol (Ed.), Social policy in the United States: Future possibilities in historical perspective (pp. 250-274). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Tabellini, G., & Alesina, A. (1990). Voting on the budget deficit. American Economic Review, 80, 37-49.
33. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.