Critical Review of Minimally Invasive Approaches in Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Knee Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 41-50

  Costa, Christopher R ^a   Johnson, Aaron J ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a   Harwin, Steven F ^b   Bonutti, Peter M ^c  

^a Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Bonutti Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Mini Incision; Minimally invasive; Review; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATIVE TIME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84879307493     PISSN: 15388506     EISSN: 19382480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313751     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Kelly MA, Clarke H.D. Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404): 51-57
2. Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stöckl B. Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(3): 293-297
3. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Murray D.W. Acritique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(12): 1628-1631
4. Insall J. A midline approach to the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971 ; 53(8): 1584-1586
5. Suda AJ, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG, Krueger M, Clarius M. Are patients'expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics 2010; 33(2): 76-80
6. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron K.D. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(1): 57-63
7. Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth I.D. Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? Knee 2007; 14 (6): 417-423
8. Dickstein R, Heffes Y, Shabtai EI, Markowitz E. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients' self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Gerontology 1998; 44(4): 204-210
9. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, Vandenborne K, Snyder-Mackler L. Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(5): 1047-1053
10. Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Pratt JA, McClung CD, Schmalzried T.P. Knee strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(5): 605-611
11. Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis K.B. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (431): 157-165
12. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(Supplement 2): 26-32
13. Bonutti PM, Neal DJ, Kester M.A. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics 2003; 26(9): 899-903
14. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, et al. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed April 19, 2011
15. Tria AJ Jr, Coon T.M. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (416): 185-190
16. Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr A.R. Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (1): 19-25
17. Lüring C, Beckmann J, Haibock P, Perlick L, Grifka J, Tingart M. Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16(10): 928-934
18. Keblish P.A. The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991 ; (271): 52-62
19. Buechel F.F. A sequential three-step lateral release for correcting fixed valgus knee deformities during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (260): 170-175
20. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Sensi L. Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 106-111
21. Boerger TO, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, Sensi L. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440: 82-87
22. Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, Seyler TM, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty using the contralateral knee as a control group: a case-control study. Int Orthop 2010; 34(4): 491-495
23. Chin PL, Foo LS, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo N.N. Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(6): 800-806
24. Han I, Seong SC, Lee S, Yoo JH, Lee M.C. Simultaneous bilateral MIS-TKA results in faster functional recovery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(6): 1449-1453
25. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Noriega-Fernandez A, Suarez-Vazquez A. Total knee arthroplasties performed with a mini-incision or a standard incision. Similar results at six months follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 27
26. Huang HT, Su JY, Chang JK, Chen CH, Wang G.J. The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(7): 1007-1012
27. Karachalios T, Giotikas D, Roidis N, Poultsides L, Bargiotas K, Malizos K. N. Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(5): 584-591
28. Kolisek FR, Bonutti PM, Hozack WJ, et al. Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(1): 8-13
29. Lin WP, Lin J, Horng LC, Chang SM, Jiang C.C. Quadriceps-sparing, minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(7): 1024-1032
30. Pan WM, Li XG, Tang TS, Qian ZL, Zhang Q, Zhang C.M. Mini-subvastus versus a standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Int Med Res 2010; 38(3): 890-900
31. Varela-Egocheaga JR, Suárez-Suárez MA, Fernández-Villán M, González-Sastre V, Varela-Gómez JR, Rodríguez-Merchán C. Minimally invasive subvastus approach: improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(5): 1200-1208
32. Bridgman SA, Walley G, MacKenzie G, Clement D, Griffiths D, Maffulli N. Sub-vastus approach is more effective than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee 2009; 16(3): 216-222
33. Juosponis R, Tarasevicius S, Smailys A, Kalesinskas R.J. Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Int Orthop 2009; 33(5): 1233-1237
34. Kashyap SN, van Ommeren JW. Clinical experience with less invasive surgery techniques in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16(6): 544-548
35. Kim YH, Kim JS, Kim D.Y. Clinical outcome and rate of complications after primary total knee replacement performed with quadriceps-sparing or standard arthrotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(4): 467-470
36. Tsuji S, Tomita T, Fujii M, Laskin RS, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Is minimally invasive surgery-total knee arthroplasty truly less invasive than standard total knee arthroplasty? A quantitative evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(6): 970-976
37. Chotanaphuti T, Ongnamthip P, Karnchanalerk K, Udombuathong P. Comparative study between 2 cm limited quadriceps exposure minimal invasive surgery and conventional total knee arthroplasty in quadriceps function: prospective randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91(2): 203-207
38. Kim JG, Lee SW, Ha JK, Choi HJ, Yang SJ, Lee M.Y. The effectiveness of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty to preserve quadriceps strength: a randomized controlled trial. Knee 2011; 18(6): 443-447
39. Tashiro Y, Miura H, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y. Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 463: 144-150
40. Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Hakozaki A, Kanagawa H, Toyama Y, Suda Y. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty through a lateral approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19(6): 973-979
41. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams J.B. Minimally Invasive Surgery Is Not a Risk Factor of Early Total Knee Arthroplasty Failure. Semin Arthroplasty 2010; 21(2): 92-96
42. Karpman RR, Smith H.L. Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(5): 681-688
43. Bonutti PM, Zywiel MG, Ulrich SD, Stroh DA, Seyler TM, Mont M.A. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(3): 575-582
44. Walter F, Haynes MB, Markel D.C. A randomized prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on the early functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(4): 509-514
45. Dalury DF, Mulliken BD, Adams MJ, Lewis C, Sauder RR, Bushey J.A. Early recovery after total knee arthroplasty performed with and without patellar eversion and tibial translation. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(6): 1339-1343
46. Gandhi R, Smith H, Lefaivre KA, Davey JR, Mahomed N.N. Complications after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty as compared with traditional incision techniques: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(1): 29-35
47. Cheng T, Liu T, Zhang G, Peng X, Zhang X. Does minimally invasive surgery improve short-term recovery in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(6): 1635-1648
48. Seyler TM, Bonutti PM, Ulrich SD, Fatscher T, Marker DR, Mont M.A. Minimally invasive lateral approach to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(7, Supplement 3): 21-26
49. Mont MA, Zywiel MG, McGrath MS, Bonutti P.M. Scientific evidence for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2010; 59: 73-82
50. Khanna A, Gougoulias N, Longo UG, Maffulli N. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40(4): 479-489, viii
51. Smith TO, King JJ, Hing C.B. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes following minimally invasive to conventional exposure for total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2012; 19(1): 1-7
52. Martin A, Sheinkop MB, Langhenry MM, Widemschek M, Benesch T, von Strempel A. Comparison of two minimally invasive implantation instrument-sets for total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18(3): 359-366
53. Wülker N, Lambermont JP, Sacchetti L, Lazaro JG, Nardi J. A prospective randomized study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92(7): 1584-1590
54. Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim J.S. Short-term results of primary total knee arthroplasties performed with a mini-incision or a standard incision. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(5): 712-718