Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty using the contralateral knee as a control group: A case-control study

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 491-495

  Bonutti, Peter M ^a   Zywiel, Michael G ^b   Seyler, Thorsten M ^b   Lee, Seung Yong ^c   McGrath, Mike S ^b   Marker, David R ^b   Mont, Michael A ^b  

^a Bonutti Clinic   (United States)

^b SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^c Hallym University Medical Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE STRENGTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; RANGE OF MOTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; KINETICS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUADRICEPS MUSCLE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950917954     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0775-4     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. PM Bonutti MA Mont MA Kester 2004 Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach Orthop Clin North Am 35 2 217 226 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.02.001 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.02.001 15062707 (Pubitemid 38438348)
2. PM Bonutti MA Mont M McMahon, et al. 2004 Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A Suppl 2 26 32 (Pubitemid 39628344)
3. FF Buechel Sr 2002 Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement Clin Orthop Relat Res 404 40 50 10.1097/01.blo.0000036529.46246.88 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00008 12439236 (Pubitemid 35351047)
4. PH Bullens CJ van Loon MC de Waal Malefijt, et al. 2001 Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments J Arthroplasty 16 6 740 747 10.1054/arth.2001. 23922 10.1054/arth.2001.23922 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvpvVWrsA%3D%3D 11547372 (Pubitemid 32803640)
5. DF Dalury WA Jiranek 1999 A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 14 1 33 37 10.1016/S0883-5403(99) 90199-7 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90199-7 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7isVWnsg%3D%3D 9926950 (Pubitemid 29042741)
6. R Dickstein Y Heffes EI Shabtai, et al. 1998 Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients' self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively Gerontology 44 4 204 210 10.1159/000022011 10.1159/000022011 1:STN:280:DyaK1czitFaquw%3D%3D 9657080 (Pubitemid 28305941)
7. MC Dixon RR Brown D Parsch, et al. 2005 Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 3 598 603 10.2106/JBJS.C.00591 10.2106/JBJS.C.00591 15741628 (Pubitemid 40315012)
8. FC Ewald 1989 The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 9 12 2805502 (Pubitemid 20204774)
9. DE Font-Rodriguez GR Scuderi JN Insall 1997 Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 345 79 86 10.1097/00003086- 199712000-00012 9418624 (Pubitemid 28007489)
10. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott, et al. 1989 Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 13 14 2805470
11. EM Keating PM Faris JB Meding, et al. 1999 Comparison of the midvastus muscle-splitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 14 1 29 32 10.1016/S0883-5403(99) 90198-5 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90198-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7isVWguw%3D%3D 9926949 (Pubitemid 29042740)
12. EM Keating JB Meding PM Faris, et al. 2002 Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements Clin Orthop Relat Res 404 34 39 10.1097/01.blo.0000030485.77561.57 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00007 12439235 (Pubitemid 35351046)
13. MA Kelly HD Clarke 2002 Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 404 51 57 10.1097/01/blo.0000030486.77561.8c 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00009 12439237 (Pubitemid 35351048)
14. A Maestro MA Suarez L Rodriguez, et al. 2000 The midvastus surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty Int Orthop 24 2 104 107 10.1007/ s002640000116 10.1007/s002640000116 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fislaksw%3D%3D 10894381 (Pubitemid 30342739)
15. NN Mahomed MH Liang EF Cook, et al. 2002 The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty J Rheumatol 29 6 1273 1279 12064846
16. V Pavone F Boettner S Fickert, et al. 2001 Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup Clin Orthop Relat Res 388 18 25 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00005 11451118 (Pubitemid 32595002)
17. RE White Jr JK Allman JA Trauger, et al. 1999 Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches Clin Orthop Relat Res 367 117 122 10.1097/00003086-199910000-00014 10546605