Total knee arthroplasties performed with a mini-incision or a standard incision. Similar results at six months follow-up

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Hernandez Vaquero, Daniel ^a,b   Noriega Fernandez, Alfonso ^b   Suarez Vazquez, Abelardo ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE OVIEDO   (Spain)

^b Hospital S Agustin   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEPHALOSPORIN; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN; PARACETAMOL; ANALGESIC AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LOCAL SORENESS; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NOCICEPTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; RATING SCALE; SATISFACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX; SHORT FORM 12; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALGESICS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77949419123     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-27     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: principles and technique. EM Goble DF Justin, Orthop Clin North Am 2004 35 227 234 10.1016/S0030-5898(03) 00113-5 15062708
2. Minimally invasive total knee replacement using a mini-mid vastus incision technique and results. RS Laskin, Surg Technol Int 2004 13 231 238 15744695
3. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. JN Insall LD Dorr RD Scott WN Scott, Clin Orthop 1989 248 13 14 2805470
4. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee Replacement. PN Baker JH van der Meulen J Lewsey PJ Gregg, J Bone Jt Surg Br 2007 89-B 893 900 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091
5. Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Outcome Assessments. PHJ Bullens J van Loon Corme MC de Waal Malefijt RFJM Laan RPH Veth, J Arthroplasty 2001 16 740 747 10.1054/arth.2001.23922 11547372
6. Early patient outcomes after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study. RC Hartley NG Barton-Hanson R Finley RW Parkinson, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002 84 994 999 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12607 12358393
7. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. SJ MacDonald KD Charron RB Bourne DD Naudie RW McCalden CH Rorabeck, Clin Orthop 2008 466 2612 2616 10.1007/s11999-008-0430-1 18800216
8. Comparison of the Vastus-Splitting and Median Parapatellar Approaches for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study Surgical Technique. MJ Kelly MN Rumi M Kothari MA Parentis KJ Bailey WM Parrish VD Pellegrini, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 80 92 10.2106/JBJS.F.01190 17332127
9. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Radiologic Outcomes of Conventional and Minimally Invasive Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty. CPL Chin LS Shen Foo KY Yang SJ Yeo NN Lo, J Arthroplasty 2007 22 800 806 10.1016/j.arth.2006.10.009 17826268
10. Clinical Experience Using a Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Early Results of a Prospective Randomized Study Compared to a Standard Approach. FR Kolisek PM Bonutti WJ Hozack J Purtill PF Sharkey SB Zelicof PS Ragland M Kester MA Mont RH Rothman, J Arthroplasty 2007 22 8 13 10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.004 17197302
11. Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach. A prospective randomized clinical and radiological trial. KT Karachalios D Giotikas N Roidis L Poultsides K Bargiotas KN Malizos, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90-B 584 591 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20122
12. Clinical outcome and rate of complications after primary total knee replacement performed with quadriceps-sparing or standard arthrotomy. Y-H Kim J-S Kim D-Y Kim, J Bone Jt Surg Br 2007 89B 467 470
13. Minimally Invasive versus Standard Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Y Tashiro H Miura S Matsuda K Okazaki Y Iwamoto, Clin Orthop 2007 463 144 150 17960677
14. Simultaneous Bilateral MIS-TKA Results in Faster Functional Recovery. I Han SC Seong S Lee JH Yoo MC Lee, Clin Orthop 2008 466 1449 1453 10.1007/s11999-008-0216-5 18351423
15. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach. PM Bonutti MA Mont MA Kester, Orthop Clin North Am 2004 35 217 226 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.02.001 15062707
16. Minimally invasive surgery - total knee arthroplasty. JB Reid D Guttmann M Ayala JH Lubowitz, Arthroscopy 2004 20 884 889 15483555
17. Short-Term Results of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties Performed with a Mini-Incision or a Standard Incision. Y Hoo Kim KS Sohn JS Kim, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 712 718 10.1016/j.arth.2005.09.001 16877158
18. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use. RS Laskin, Clin Orthop 2005 440 54 59 10.1097/01.blo.0000186562.08685.a2 16239784
19. Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty. PM Bonutti MA Mont M McMahon PS Ragland M Kester, J Bone Jt Surg Am 2004 86A 26 32
20. Early Clinical Outcome of Minimally Invasive Quadriceps-Sparing Total Knee Arthroplasty Report of a 2-Year Follow-Up. H Hsuan-Ti Huang J Yuan Su Je-Ken Chang Chung-Hwan Chen Gwo-Jaw Wang, J Arthroplasty 2007 22 1007 1012 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.021 17920473
21. Computer Navigation-assisted versus Minimally Invasive TKA. Benefits and Drawbacks. PM Bonutti D Dethmers SD Ulrich TM Seyler MA Mont, Clin Orthop 2008 466 2756 2762 10.1007/s11999-008-0429-7 18815850
22. Early recovery after total knee arhroplasty performed with and without patellar eversion and tibial translation. A prospective randomized study. DF Dalury BD Mulliken MJ Adams C Lewis RR Saunder JA Bushey, J Bone Jt Surg Am 2009 91 1339 1343 10.2106/JBJS.H.00435
23. The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques on Early Range of Motion After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. AC McAllister JD Stepanian, J Arthroplasty 2008 23 10 18 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.011 18165022
24. Minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing TKA: results of a comprehensive pathway for outpatient TKA. RA Berger S Sanders E D'Ambrogio K Buchheit C Deirmengian W Paprosky CJ Della Valle AG Rosenberg, J Knee Surg 2006 19 145 148 16642894
25. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. SB Haas S Cook B Beksac, Clin Orthop 2004 428 68 73 10.1097/01.blo.0000147649.82883.ca 15534521
26. Avoiding the potential pitfalls of minimally invasive total knee surgery. KR Berend AV Lombardi, Orthopedics 2005 28 1326 1330 16295190
27. Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Traditional Total Knee Arthroplasty Assessment of the Learning Curve and the Postoperative Recuperative Period. J King DL Stamper DC Schaad SS Leopold, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 1497 1503 10.2106/JBJS.F.00867 17606788