Complications After Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty as Compared With Traditional Incision Techniques. A Meta-Analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 29-35

  Gandhi, Rajiv ^a   Smith, Holly ^a   Lefaivre, Kelly A ^b   Davey, J Rod ^a   Mahomed, Nizar N ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complications; Knee; Minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DELIRIUM; FEMALE; FRACTURE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INCISION; ISCHIALGIA; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE STIFFNESS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATELLA TENDON; PERONEUS NERVE PARALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RISK; SKIN NECROSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TENDON INJURY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78650043091     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bonutti P.M., Mont M.A., McMahon M., et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2004, 86:26.
2. Rees J.L., Price A.J., Beard D.J., et al. Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional results at one year and the effect of surgical inexperience. Knee 2004, 11:363.
3. Chauhan S.K., Norris M., Bonutti P. MIS total knee arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or more information soon. Knee 2006, 13:417.
4. Laskin R.S., Beksac B., Phongjunakorn A., et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:74.
5. Hoffman A.A., Plaster R.I., Murdock L.E. Subvastus (southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 269:70.
6. Tenholder M., Clarke H.D., Scuderi G.R. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: the early clinical experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:67.
7. Laskin R.S. Mini-incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary in opposition. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:19.
8. Haas S.B., Cook S., Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:68.
9. Schroer W.C., Diesfeld P.J., Reedy M.E., et al. Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:19.
10. Tria A.J., Coon T.M. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 416:185.
11. Chen A.F., Alan R.K., Redziniak D.E., et al. Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement: the initial experience with results at two to four years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006, 88-B:48.
12. Han I., Seong S.C., Lee S., et al. Simultaneous bilateral MIS-TKA results in faster functional recovery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:1449.
13. Boerger T.O., Aglietti P., Mondanelli N., et al. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:82.
14. Dalury D.F., Dennis D.A. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase the risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 440:77.
15. Barrack R.L., Barnes C.L., Burnett S.J., et al. Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:489.
16. Detsky A.S., Naylor C.D., O'Rourke K., et al. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:255.
17. Deeks MJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. BMJ 2001;285.
18. Hedges L.V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press 1985, 108.
19. Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327:557.
20. Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M., et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997, 315:629.
21. Aziz O., Rao C., Panesar S.S., et al. Meta-analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery. BMJ 2007, 334:617.
22. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986, 7:177.
23. Karachalios T., Giotikas D., Roidis N., et al. Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008, 90:584.
24. Karpman RR, Smith HL. Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:681.
25. Kolisek F.R., Bonutti P.M., Hozack W.J., et al. Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:8.
26. Chin P.L., Foo L.S., Yang K.Y., et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:800.
27. Luring C., Beckmann J., Haibock P., et al. Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:928.
28. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S., Kim D.Y. Clinical outcome and rate of complications after primary total knee replacement performed with quadriceps-sparing or standard arthrotomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007, 89-B:467.
29. Tashiro Y., Miura H., Matsuda S., et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 463:144.
30. King J., Stamper D.L., Schaad D.C., et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg 2007, 89:1497.
31. Tria A.J. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2003, 26:s859.
32. Aglietti P., Baldini A., Sensi L. Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:106.
33. Niki Y., Mochizuki T., Momohara S., et al. Is minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty really minimally invasive surgery?. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:499.
34. Vavken P., Gruber M., Dorotka R. Outcomes after minimally invasive total knee replacement-a meta-analysis. Z Orthop Unfallchir 2008, 146:768.
35. McAllister C.M., Stepanian J.D. The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:10.
36. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., Chang J.K., et al. The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1007.
37. Dalury D.F., Dennis D.A. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2005, 440:77.
38. Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., et al. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:57.
39. Holt G., Wheelan K., Gregori A. The ethical implications of recent innovations in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2006, 88:226.