Explaining intention to use an enterprise resource planning system: A replication and extension;Objašnjenje namjere primjene sustava za planiranje resursa poduzeća: Ponavljanje i proširenje

Tehnicki Vjesnik

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 397-405

  Soto Acosta, Pedro ^a   Ramayah, Thurasamy ^b   Popa, Simona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Communication; Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP); Perceived ease of use; Perceived usefulness; Project champion; Shared beliefs in the benefit of ERP; Training

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING (ERP); ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS; INFORMATION FLOWS; INFORMATION TRANSACTION; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PROJECT CHAMPIONS; STRATEGIC DECISIONS;

COMMUNICATION; ENGINEERING; PERSONNEL TRAINING;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 84879271151     PISSN: 13303651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Adams, D. A.; Nelson, R. R.; Todd, P. A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, (1992), pp. 227-247.
2. Agarwal, R.; Karahanna, E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, (2000), pp. 665-694.
3. Agarwal, R.; Prasad, J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 2(1999), pp. 361-391.
4. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 2(1991), pp. 179-212.
5. Aladwani, A. M. Change management strategies for successful ERP implementation. Business Process Management, 7, 3(2001), pp. 266-275.
6. Al-Mashari, M.; Zairi, M. BPR implementation process: An analysis of key success and failure factors. Business Process Management Journal, 5, 1(1999), pp. 87-112.
7. Amoako-Gyampah, K. Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: An empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 3(2007), pp. 1232-1248.
8. Amoako-Gyampah, K.; Salam, A. F. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41, 6(2004), pp. 731-745.
9. Ardichvili, A.; Page, V.; Wentling, T. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, (2003), pp. 64-77.
10. A. Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. Journal of Management and Information Systems, 19, 1(2002), pp. 211-241.
11. Brown, C.; Vessey, I. ERP implementation approaches: Toward a contingency framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, (1999), pp. 411-416.
12. Calisir, F.; Calisir, F. The relations of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 4(2004), pp. 505-515.
13. Carter, F. J.; Jambulingham, T.; Gupta, V. K.; Melone, N. Technological innovations: A framework for communicating diffusion effects. Information & Management, 38, (2001), pp. 277-287.
14. Chan, S.; Lu, M. Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior. A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Global Information Management, 12, 3(2004), pp. 21-44.
15. Chau, P.; Hu, P. Investigating healthcare professionals' decision to accept telemedicine technology. Information & Management, 39, 4(2002), pp. 231-297.
16. Chen, I. J.; Popovich, K. Understanding customer relationship management (CRM). People process and technology. Business Process Management Journal, 9, 5(2003), pp. 672-688.
17. Colomo-Palacios, R.; Casado-Lumbreras, C.; Soto-Acosta, P.; García-Peñalvo, F. J.; Tovar-Caro, E. Competence gaps in software personnel. A multi-organizational study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2(2013), pp. 456-461.
18. Colomo-Palacios, R.; Fernandes, E.; Soto-Acosta, P.; Sabbagh, M. Software product evolution for intellectual capital management: The case of Meta4 PeopleNet. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 4(2011), pp. 395-399.
19. Colomo-Palacios, R.; Soto-Acosta, P.; García-Peñalvo, F. J.; García-Crespo, A. A study on the impact of global software development in packaged software release planning. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19, 18(2012), pp. 2646-2668.
20. Davis, F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, (1989), pp. 983-1003.
21. Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; Warshaw, P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 8(1989), pp. 982-1003.
22. Davis, F. D. A technology acceptance for empirically testing new end user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
23. Delak, B.; Bajec, M. Framework for the delivery of information system due diligence. Information Systems Management, 30, 2(2013), pp. 137-149.
24. Ellis, D.; Allen, D.; Wilson, T. Information science and information systems: Conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 12(1999), pp. 1095-1107.
25. Falkowski, G.; Pedigo, P.; Smith, B.; Swanson, D. A recipe for ERP success. Beyond Computing, (1998), pp. 44-45.
26. Fishbein, H.; Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. Reading/MA, 1975.
27. Gordon, S. R.; Tarafdar, M. How do a company's information technology competences influence its ability to innovate? Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20, 3(2007), pp. 271-290.
28. Guriting, P.; Ndubisi, N. O. Borneo online banking: Evaluating customer perceptions and bahavioural intention. Management Research News, 29, 1/2(2006), pp. 6-15.
29. Hoyle, R. H.; Harris, M. J.; Judd, C. M. Research Methods in Social Relations, 7th ed., Wadsworth: Pacific Grove, CA, 2002.
30. Hsu, M. H.; Chiu, C. M. Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems. 38, 3(2004), pp. 369-381.
31. Huang, S.-M.; Chang, I.-C.; Li, S.-H.; Lin, M.-T. Assessing risk in ERP projects: Identify and prioritize the factors. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104, 8(2004), pp. 681-688.
32. Ignatius, J., & Ramayah, T. An empirical investigation of the Course Website Acceptance Model (CWAM). International Journal of Business and Society, 6, 2(2005), pp. 69-82.
33. Kydd, C. T. Understanding the information content of MIS management tools. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3(1999), pp. 276-290.
34. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007.
35. Lederer, A. L.; Maupin, D. J.; Sena, M. P.; Zhuang, Y The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, 3(2000), pp. 269-282.
36. Lee, Y.; Kozar, K. A.; Larsen, K. R. T. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the AIS, 12, (2003), pp. 752-780.
37. Liu, S. H.; Liao, H. L.; Peng, C. J. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online e-learning users' acceptance behavior. Issues in Information Systems, 6, 2(2005), pp. 175-181.
38. Lo, C. H.; Tsai, C. H.; Li, R. K. A case study of ERP implementation for Opto-Electronics Industry. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13, 1(2005), pp. 13-30.
39. Lucio-Nieto, T.; Colomo-Palacios, R.; Soto-Acosta, P.; Popa, S.; Amescua-Seco, A. Implementing an IT service information management framework: The case of COTEMAR. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 6(2012), pp. 589-594.
40. Mandal, P.; Gunasekaran, A. Application of SAP R/3 in online inventory control. International Journal of Production Economics, 75, (2002), pp. 47-55.
41. Mathieson, K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), (1991), pp. 173-191
42. Mirani, R.; Lederer, A. L. An instrument for assessing the organizational benefits of IS projects. Decision Sciences, 29, 4(1998), pp. 803-838.
43. Nah, F.; Lau, J.; Kuang, J. Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal, 7, 3(2001), pp. 285-296.
44. Nah, F.; Zuckweiler, K. M.; Lau, J. ERP implementation: chief information officers perceptions of critical success factors. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 1(2003), pp. 5-22.
45. Ndubisi N.; Jantan M.; Richardson S. Is The Technology Acceptance Model Valid For Entrepreneurs? Model Testing And Examining Usage Determinants. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 6, 2(2001), pp. 31-54.
46. Parr, A.; Shanks, G. Critical success factors revisited: A model for ERP project implementation. In G. Shanks, P. B. Seddon, and L. P. Willcocks (Eds.), Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2003), pp. 196-219.
47. Pavlou, P. A.; Fygenson, M. Understandings and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1(2006), pp. 115-143.
48. Pinto, J. K. The project implementation profile: A tool to aid in project tracking and control. International Journal of Project Management, 8, 3(1990), pp. 173-182.
49. Ramayah, T. Course website usage among distance learning business students: The role of prior experience. International Journal of Learning, 11, (2005), pp. 1507-1517.
50. Ramayah, T. Course website usage: Does prior experience matter. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science & Applications, 2, 2(2006), pp. 299-306.
51. Ramayah, T. Interface characteristics, perceived ease of use and intention to use an online library in Malaysia. Information Development, 22, 2(2006), pp. 123-133.
52. Ramayah, T.; Aafaqi, B. Role of Self-Efficacy in e-Library usage among Students of a Public University in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 9, 1(2004), pp. 39-57.
53. Ramayah, T.; Jantan, M. Internet usage among Malaysian students: The role of demographic and motivational Variables. PRANJANA: The Journal of Management Awareness, 7, 2(2004), pp. 59-70.
54. Ramayah, T.; Lo, M. C. Impact of shared beliefs on perceived usefulness and ease of use in the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system. Management Research News, 30, 6(2007), pp. 420-431.
55. Ramayah, T.; Ignatius, J.; Aafaqi, B. PC usage among students in a private institution of higher learning: The moderating role of prior experience. Educators and Education Journal, 20, (2005), pp. 131-152.
56. th October 2002.
57. st ed.). Free Press, New York, NY, 1962.
58. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. New York, The Free Press, 2003.
59. Sharratt, M.; Usoro, A. Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 2(2003), pp. 1-12.
60. Shehab, E. M.; Sharp, M.W.; Supramaniam, L.; Spedding, T. A. Enterprise resource planning. Business Process Management Journal, 10, (2004), pp. 359-386.
61. Shen, Y. H.; Hsu, P. Y. ERP implementation effect not up to expectations? Data and Computers, (2002), pp. 52-57.
62. Song, S.; Song, J. Collaborative electronic media usage for information sharing: Technology competence and social ties. Eighth Americas Conference on information Systems, (2002), pp. 1139-1142.
63. Straub, D.; Keil, M.; Brenner, W. Testing the Technology Acceptance Model across Cultures: A three country study. Information and Management, 33, 1(1997), pp. 1-11.
64. Szajna, B. Empirical evaluation of the revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science, 42, (1996), pp. 85-92.
65. Taylor, S.; Todd, P. Assessing IT usage: The Role of Prior Experience. MIS Quaterly, 19, 4(1995), pp. 561-570.
66. Teo, T.; Lim, V.; Lai, R. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 27, 1(1999), pp. 25-37.
67. Travica, B. Of disobedience, divinations, monsters and fumbling: Adopting a self-service system. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 2, (2007), pp. 15-29.
68. Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F. D. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 2(2000), pp. 186-204.
69. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1(2000), pp. 115-139.
70. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; Davis, F. D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (2003), pp. 425-478.
71. Vosburg, J.; Kumar, A. Managing dirty data in organizations using ERP. Lesson from A case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101, 1(2001), pp. 21-31.
72. Zhang, P.; Li, N.; Sun, H. Affective Quality and Cognitive Absorption: Extending Technology Acceptance Research. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Kauai, Hawaii, 2006.