Induced fit docking, and the use of QM/MM methods in docking

Drug Discovery Today: Technologies

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Xu, Mengang ^a   Lill, Markus A ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTUM MECHANICS; REVIEW;

DRUG DISCOVERY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEINS; QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 84879224111     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17406749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2013.02.003     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. H.A. Carlson Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6 2002 447 452
2. M.L. Teodoro, and L.E. Kavraki Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design Curr. Pharm. Design 9 2003 1635 1648
3. M. Totrov, and R. Abagyan Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 18 2008 178 184
4. C. Beier, and M. Zacharias Tackling the challenges posed by target flexibility in drug design Expert Opin. Drug Dis. 5 2010 347 359
5. C. Rao Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications Drug Discov. Today 14 2009 394 400
6. C.A. Sotriffer Accounting for induced-fit effects in docking: what is possible and what is not? Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 11 2011 179 191
7. J.H. Lin Accommodating protein flexibility for structure-based drug design Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 11 2011 171 178
8. F.N. Novikov CSAR scoring challenge reveals the need for new concepts in estimating protein-ligand binding affinity J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 2011 2090 2096
9. R.D. Smith CSAR Benchmark Exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 2011 2115 2131
10. M.A. Lill Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations Biochemistry 50 2011 6157 6169
11. M. Dietzen On the applicability of elastic network normal modes in small-molecule docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 2012 844 856
12. M. Xu, and M.A. Lill Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 2011 693 706
13. X. Barril, and S.D. Morley Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures J. Med. Chem. 48 2005 4432 4443
14. G. Bottegoni Systematic exploitation of multiple receptor conformations for virtual ligand screening PLoS One 6 2011 e18845
15. O. Korb Potential and limitations of ensemble docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 2012 1262 1274
16. R.E. Amaro An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 22 2008 693 705
17. E.S. Bolstad, and A.C. Anderson In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: pruning ensembles of receptor structures for increased efficiency and accuracy during docking Proteins 75 2009 62 74
18. M. Xu, and M.A. Lill Utilizing experimental data for reducing ensemble size in flexible-protein docking J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52 2012 187 198
19. S. Leis, and M. Zacharias Efficient inclusion of receptor flexibility in grid-based protein-ligand docking J. Comput. Chem. 32 2011 3433 3439
20. D.M. Kruger Target flexibility in RNA-ligand docking modeled by elastic potential grids ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2 2011 489 493
21. S. Kazemi Elastic potential grids: accurate and efficient representation of intermolecular interactions for fully flexible docking ChemMedChem 4 2009 1264 1268
22. T. Zhou, and A. Caflisch High-throughput virtual screening using quantum mechanical probes: discovery of selective kinase inhibitors ChemMedChem 5 2010 1007 1014
23. S.K. Burger Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics strategies for docking pose refinement: distinguishing between binders and decoys in cytochrome C peroxidase J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51 2011 93 101
24. S.A. Hayik A mixed QM/MM scoring function to predict protein-ligand binding affinity J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6 2010 3079 3091
25. P. Soderhjelm Ligand affinities estimated by quantum chemical calculations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6 2010 1726 1737
26. P. Fong Assessment of QM/MM scoring functions for molecular docking to HIV-1 protease J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 2009 913 924
27. A. Ciancetta A QM/MM study of the binding of RAPTA ligands to cathepsin B J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 25 2011 729 742
28. P. Soderhjelm Calculation of protein-ligand interaction energies by a fragmentation approach combining high-level quantum chemistry with classical many-body effects J. Phys. Chem. B 113 2009 11085 11094
29. K. Raha, and K.M. Merz Jr. A quantum mechanics-based scoring function: study of zinc ion-mediated ligand binding J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 2004 1020 1021
30. J. Fanfrlik A reliable docking/scoring scheme based on the semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6-DH2 method accurately covering dispersion and H-bonding: HIV-1 protease with 22 ligands J. Phys. Chem. B 114 2010 12666 12678
31. X. Zhang Quantum mechanical pairwise decomposition analysis of protein kinase B inhibitors: validating a new tool for guiding drug design J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50 2010 651 661
32. T. Zhou Is quantum mechanics necessary for predicting binding free energy? J. Med. Chem. 51 2008 4280 4288
33. K. Kitaura Fragment molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for large molecules Chem. Phys. Lett. 313 1999 701 706
34. D.W. Zhang, and J.Z.H. Zhang Molecular fractionation with conjugate caps for full quantum mechanical calculation of protein-molecule interaction energy J. Chem. Phys. 119 2003 3599 3605
35. H. Watanabe Incorporation of solvation effects into the fragment molecular orbital calculations with the Poisson-Boltzmann equation Chem. Phys. Lett. 500 2010 116 119
36. Sawada Role of the key mutation in the selective binding of avian and human influenza hemagglutinin to sialosides revealed by quantum-mechanical calculations J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 2010 16862 16872
37. K. Yamagishi Flexible ligand recognition of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 2010 3344 3347
38. K. Yamagishi Interactions between 1 alpha, 25(OH)(2)D-3 and residues in the ligand-binding pocket of the vitamin D receptor: a correlated fragment molecular orbital study J. Steroid Biochem. 121 2010 63 67
39. M.P. Mazanetz Prediction of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 inhibitor potency using the fragment molecular orbital method J. Cheminf. 3 2011 2
40. P. Soderhjelm Accuracy of typical approximations in classical models of intermolecular polarization J. Chem. Phys. 128 2008 014102