Integrative analysis of DNA phylogeography and morphology of the European rose chafer (Cetonia aurata) to infer species taxonomy and patterns of postglacial colonisation in Europe

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 83-94

  Ahrens, Dirk ^a,b   Fabrizi, Silvia ^a,b   Šipek, Petr ^c   Lago, Paul K ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG   (Germany)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Beetles; Cox1; Eigenshape analysis; Integrative taxonomy; ITS1

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; COX1; DNA SEQUENCE; EIGENSHAPE ANALYSIS; EUROPE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; INTEGRATIVE TAXONOMY; ITS1; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

BEETLES; COX1; EIGENSHAPE ANALYSIS; INTEGRATIVE TAXONOMY; ITS1;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EUROPE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HAPLOTYPES; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

CETONIA; CETONIA AURATA; COLEOPTERA; LONCHOCARPUS GLAUCIFOLIUS;

EID: 84879195797     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Acinas S.G., Klepac-Ceraj V., Hunt D.E., Pharino C., Ceraj I., Distel D.L., Polz M.F. Fine-scale phylogenetic architecture of a complex bacterial community. Nature 2004, 430:551-554.
2. Ahrens D., Monaghan M.T., Vogler A.P. DNA-based taxonomy for associating adults and larvae in multi-species assemblages of chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44:436-449.
3. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19:716-723.
4. Akamine M., Ishikawa K., Maekawa K., Kon M. The physical mechanism of cuticular color in Phelotrupes auratus (Coleoptera, Geotrupidae). Entomol. Sci. 2011, 14:291-296.
5. Aliquo V. Cetonia aurata sicula n. ssp. della Sicilia. Naturalista Sicil 1983, 4:35-39.
6. Allen J.R.M., Brandt U., Brauer A., Hubberten H.-W., Huntley B., Kellerk J., Kramlk M., Mackensen A., Mingram J., Negendank J.F.W., Nowaczyk N.R., Oberhänsli H., Watts W.A., Wulf S., Zolitschka B. Rapid environmental changes in southern Europe during the last glacial period. Nature 1999, 400:740-743.
7. Astrin J.J., Stüben P.E., Misof B., Wägele J.W., Gimnich F., Raupach M.J., Ahrens D. Exploring diversity in cryptorhynchine weevils (Coleoptera) using distance-, character- and tree-based species delineation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 63:1-14.
8. Avise J.C. Phylogeography 2000, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. Baraud, J., 1992. Coleopteres Scarabaeoidea d'Europe (Faune de France, 78). Federation francaise des Societes de Sciences naturelles et Societe linneenne de Lyon, Lyon.
10. Beamont M.A., Nielsen R., Robert C., Hey J., Gaggiotti O., Knowles L., Estoup A., Panchal M., Corander J., Hickerson M., Sisson S.A., Fagundes N., Chikhi L., Beerli P., Vitalis R., Cornuet J.-M., Huelsenbeck J., Foll M., Yang Z., Rousset F., Balding D., Excoffier L. In defence of model-based inference in phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:436-446.
11. Bergsten J., Bilton D.T., Fujisawa T., Elliott M., Monaghan M.T., Balke M., Hendrich L., Geijer J., Herrmann J., Foster G.N., Ribera I., Nilsson A.N., Barraclough T.G., Vogler A.P. The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding. Syst. Biol 2012, 10.1093/sysbio/sys037.
12. Blaxter M.L. The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 359:669-679.
13. Bourgin P. Les trois races de Cetonia aurata L., leurs varietes. Rev. Fr. Entomol. 1943, 9(3-4):104-126.
14. Bourgin P. Les différentes formes de Cetonia aurata L. de la Faune française (Col. Scarabaeidae). L'Entomologiste 1945, 1(36-41):113-119.
15. Brewer S., Cheddadi R., de Beaulieu J.L., Reille M., Data contributors The spread of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2002, 156:27-48.
16. Britton T., Anderson C.L., Jacquet D., Lundqvist S., Bremer K. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:741-752.
17. Brower A.V.Z. Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA Evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91:6491-6495.
18. Cardoso A., Vogler A.P. DNA taxonomy, phylogeny and Pleistocene diversification of the Cicindela hybrida species group (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:3531-3546.
19. Caubet, F., 1999. Description d'une nouvelle forme individuelle Cetonia aurata pisana Heer, 1841. Rutilans 2(2), 42, 46.
20. Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:1657-1659.
21. Crandall K.A., Bininda-Emonds O.R.P., Mace G.M., Wayne R.K. Considering evolutionary process in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15:290-295.
22. Davis A.L.V., Brink D.J., Scholtz C.H., Prinsloo L.C., Deschodt C.H. Functional implications of temperature-correlated colour polymorphism in an iridescent, scarabaeine dung beetle. Ecol. Entomol. 2008, 33:771-779.
23. Dellacasa, G., 1973. Materiali per lo studio delle forme italiane della Cetonia aurata. Boll. G.E.L., Genova, vol. 8, pp. 3-9.
24. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7.
25. Dupanloup I., Schneider S., Excoffier L. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:2571-2581.
26. Excoffier L., Smouse P., Quattro J. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 1992, 131:479-491.
27. Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinf. Online 2005, 1:47-50.
28. Ezard, T., Fujisawa, T., Barraclough, T., 2009. SPLITS: Species' Limits by Threshold Statistics. Rpackage Version 1.0-11/r29. <>. http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/splits/.
29. Fitzpatrick B.M. Power and sample size for nested analysis of molecular variance. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:3961-3966.
30. Gómez-Zurita J., Petitpierre E., Juan C. Nested cladistic analysis, phylogeography and speciation in the Timarcha goettingensis complex (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:557-570.
31. Guidon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:696-704.
32. Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., DeWaard J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. B 2003, 270:313-321.
33. Hebert P.D.N., Ratnasingham S., DeWaard J.R. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. B 2003, 270(Suppl.):S96-S99.
34. Hebert P.D.N., Penton E.H., Burns J.M., Janzen D.H., Hallwachs W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:14812-14817.
35. Heller K.M. Über die corsicanischen Varietäten der Cetonia aurata L. Ent. Nachr. 1900, 26:54-57.
36. Henrotte, J.-G., Bernardi, G., Thi Hong, Nguyen, Franck-Riquer, G., Santarromana, M., 1984. Facteurs génétiques de variabilité de la teneur en magnésium chez Cetonia aurata et Potosia cuprea. C. r. séances Acad. sci., Sér. 3, Sci. vie 299, 339-342.
37. Huson D.H., Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23(2):254-267. (Software available from http://www.splitstree.org).
38. Knowles L.L., Maddison W.P. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:2623-2635.
39. Krajcik, M., 1998. Cetoniidae of the world. Catalogue Part I. Typos Studios Most, 132pp.
40. Krieger, J.D., 2006. Eigenshape v2.6. Available at Morpho Tools web site: <>. http://morpho-tools.net.
41. Kurachi M., Takaku Y., Komiya Y., Hariyama T. The origin of extensive colour polymorphism in Plateumaris sericea (Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera). Naturwissenschaften 2002, 89:295-298.
42. Kuratorium Insect of the year 2000. Der Goldglänzende Rosenkäfer. Insekt des Jahres 2000.
43. Leplat J. Une nouvelle forme individuelle de Cetonia aurata (Linne). Rev. Ass. Roussillonaise Entomol. 1996, 5(1):15.
44. Lim G., Balke M., Meier R. Determining species boundaries in a world full of rarity: singletons, species delimitation methods. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:165-169.
45. Lisa R. Considérations sue Cetonia aurata L. en particulier sur les aberrations chromatiques des sous-espèces italiennes, ssp. pisana Heer, 1841 et ssp. sicula Aliquo, 1983. Rev. Ass. Roussillonaise Entomol. 1999, 8(2):33-42.
46. Lisa, R., 2001. Cetonia aurata Linneo 1761 e sue sottospecie con riferimento alle aberrazioni cromatiche (Coleoptera, Scrabaeidae). Firenze, 19pp.
47. Lohse K. Can mtDNA Barcodes Be Used to Delimit Species? A Response to Pons et al. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:439-442.
48. MacLeod N. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 1999, 25(1):107-138.
49. MacLeod N., Rose K.D. Inferring locomotor behavior in Paleogene mammals via eigenshape analysis. Am. J. Sci. 1993, 293:300-355.
50. Mico E., Moron M.A., Sipek P., Galante E. Larval morphology enhances phylogenetic reconstruction in Cetoniidae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) and allows the interpretation of the evolution of larval feeding habits. Syst. Entomol. 2008, 33:128-144.
51. Moritz C. Defining 'Evolutionarily Significant Units' for conservation. Tree 1994, 9:373-375.
52. Moritz C., Cicero C. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:1529-1531.
53. Mulsant, M.E., 1842. Histoire Naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Lamellicornes, Pectinicornes. Maison Libraire, Paris; Imprimerie de Dumoulin, Ronet et Sibuet, Lyon, 626 pp.
54. Nedelkov N. Peti prinos kumo entomologitschnata fauna na Bulgaria. Sbornik Narodni Umortv. Nauka i Kniznina 1909, 25:3-37.
55. Padial J.M., Castroviejo-Fisher S., Köhler J., Vilà C., Chaparro J.C., De La Riva I. Deciphering the products of evolution at the species level: the need for an integrative taxonomy. Zool. Scr. 2009, 38:431-447.
56. Padial J.M., Miralles A., De La Riva I., Vences M. The integrative future of taxonomy. Front. Zool. 2010, 2010(7):16.
57. Paetkau D. Using genetics to identify infraspecifi conservation units: a critique of current methods. Conserv. Biol. 1999, 13:1507-1509.
58. Panchal M., Beaumont M.A. The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Evolution 2008, 61:1466-1480.
59. Papadopoulou A., Anastasiou I., Vogler A.P. Revisiting the insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-Aegean trench calibration. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:1659-1672.
60. Petit R.J. On the falsifiability of the nested clade phylogeographic analysis method. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:1404.
61. Pons J., Barraclough T.G., Gomez-Zurita J., et al. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:595-609.
62. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinf. Appl. Note 1998, 14:817-818.
63. Posada D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
64. Rataj K. New knowledge concerning certain genera of the family Cetoniidae (Coleoptera). Annot. Zool. Bot. 2000, 222:1-18.
65. Rohlf, F.J., 2006. TPSDig 2.1. Ecology & Evolution, SUNY at Stony Brook. <>. http://www.life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
66. Schlick-Steiner B.C., Steiner F.M., Seifert B., Stauffer C., Christian E., Crozier R.H. Integrative taxonomy: a multisource approach to exploring biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55:421-438.
67. Schmitt T. Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front. Zool. 2007, 4:11.
68. Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., et al. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1994, 87:651-701.
69. Smetana A. Cetoniinae. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera 2006, vol. 3:283-313. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 690 pp.
70. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
71. Tautz D., Arctander P., Minelli A., Thomas R.H., Vogler A.P. DNA points the way ahead in taxonomy. Nature 2002, 418:479.
72. Templeton A.R. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7:381-397.
73. Templeton A.R. Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10:779-791.
74. Templeton A.R. Nested clade analysis: an extensively validated method for strong phylogeographic inference. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:1877-1880.
75. Templeton A.R. Why does a method that fails continue to be used? The answer. Evolution 2009, 63:807-812.
76. Templeton A.R. Statistical hypothesis testing in intraspecific phylogeography: nested clade phylogeographical analysis vs. approximate Bayesian computation. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:319-331.
77. Templeton A.R., Crandall K.A., Sing C.F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 1992, 132:619-633.
78. Templeton A.R., Routman E., Phillips C.A. Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotype in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics 1995, 140:767-782.
79. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D.G. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 1997, 25:4876-4882.
80. Vogler A.P., deSalle R. Diagnosing units of conservation management. Conserv. Biol. 1994, 2:354-363.
81. Vogler A.P., deSalle R. Evolution and Phylogenetic Information Content of the ITS-l Region in the Tiger Beetle Cicindela dorsalis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1994, 11(3):393-405.
82. Vogler A.P., Monaghan M.T. Recent advances in DNA taxonomy. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2007, 45:1-10.
83. Wiens J.J., Penkrot T.A. Delimiting species using DNA and morphological variation and discordant species limits in spiny lizards (Sceloporus). Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:69-91.
84. Will K.W., Mishler B.D., Wheeler Q.D. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:844-851.
85. Zahn C.T., Roskies R.Z. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1972, 21:269-281.