Separation performance of multi-components solution by membrane technology in continual diafiltration mode

Desalination

Volumn 322, Issue , 2013, Pages 113-120

  Zhao, Liming ^a   Zhao, Hefei ^b   Nguyen, Phuongbinh ^a   Li, Aoran ^a   Jiang, Lihua ^a   Xia, Quanming ^a   Rong, Yi ^a,c   Qiu, Yongjun ^a   Zhou, Jiachun ^a  

^a EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Shanghai Qiyu Bio technique Co Ltd   (China)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diafiltration; Membrane; Retention; Soybean molasses

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL MEMBRANES; DIAFILTRATION; MASS BALANCE EQUATIONS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; RETENTION; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; SOYBEAN MOLASSES; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

EXPERIMENTS; GLUCOSE; MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; OILSEEDS; SUGAR (SUCROSE); ULTRAFILTRATION;

SEPARATION;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GLUCOSE; MEMBRANE; MODEL TEST; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RETENTION; SOLUTE; SUCROSE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 84879191006     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Fikar M., Kovacs Z., Czermak P. Dynamic optimization of batch diafiltration processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 355:168-174.
2. Goulas A.K., Grandison A.S., Rastall R.A. Fractionation of oligosaccharides by nanofiltration. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2003, 83:675-680.
3. Li W., Li J., Chen T., Chen C. Study on nanofiltration for purifying fructo-oligosaccharides I. Operation modes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 245:123-129.
4. Li W., Li J., Chen T., Zhao Z., Chen C. Study on nanofiltration for purifying fructo-oligosaccharidesII. Extended pore model. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258:8-15.
5. Luo J., Ding L., Chen X., Wan Y. Desalination of soy sauce by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66:429-437.
6. Vanneste J., Sotto A., Courtin C.M., Van Craeyveld V., Bernaerts K., Van Impe J., Vandeur J., Taes S., Van der Bruggen B. Application of tailor-made membranes in a multi-stage process for the purification of sweeteners from Stevia rebaudiana. J. Food Eng. 2011, 103:285-293.
7. Van der Bruggen B.D.B., Wilms D., Vandecasteele C. Mechanisms of retention and flux decline for the nanofiltration of dye baths from the textile industry. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 22-23:519-528.
8. Van der Bruggen B., Cornelis G., Vandecasteele C., Devreese I. Fouling of nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes applied for wastewater regeneration in the textile industry. Desalination 2005, 175:111-119.
9. Van der Bruggen L.B.B., Vandecasteele C. Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 29:23-31.
10. Martínez M.B., Van der Bruggen B., Negrin Z.R., Luis Alconero P. Separation of a high-value pharmaceutical compound from waste ethanol by nanofiltration. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18:1635-1641.
11. Mondor M., Ali F., Ippersiel D., Lamarche F. Impact of ultrafiltration/diafiltration sequence on the production of soy protein isolate by membrane technologies. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2010, 11:491-497.
12. Basso R.C., Gonçalves L.A.G., Grimaldi R., Viotto L.A. Degumming and production of soy lecithin, and the cleaning of a ceramic membrane used in the ultrafiltration and diafiltration of crude soybean oil. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 330:127-134.
13. Vegas R., Moure A., Dominguez H., Parajo J.C., Alvarez J.R., Luque S. Evaluation of ultra- and nanofiltration for refining soluble products from rice husk xylan. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:5341-5351.
14. Hua X., Zhao H., Yang R., Zhang W., Zhao W. Coupled model of extended Nernst-Planck equation and film theory in nanofiltration for xylo-oligosaccharide syrup. J. Food Eng. 2010, 100:302-309.
15. Zhao H., Hua X., Yang R., Zhao L., Zhao W., Zhang Z. Diafiltration process on xylo-oligosaccharides syrup using nanofiltration and its modelling. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 42:32-39.
16. De S., Bhattacharya P.K. Flux prediction of black liquor in cross flow ultrafiltration using low and high rejecting membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 109:109-123.
17. Paulen R., Fikar M., Kovacs Z., Czermak P. Process optimization of diafiltration with time-dependent water adding for albumin production. Chem. Eng. Process. 2011, 50:815-821.
18. Gonzalez-Munoz M.J., Paraja J.C. Diafiltration of Eucalyptus wood autohydrolysis liquors: mathematical modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 346:98-104.
19. Sun H., Qi D., Xu J., Juan S., Zhe C. Fractionation of polysaccharides from rapeseed by ultrafiltration: effect of molecular pore size and operation conditions on the membrane performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 80:670-676.
20. Karode S.K. Unsteady state flux response: a method to determine the nature of the solute and gel layer in membrane filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:9-20.
21. Wang X.-M., Waite T.D. Impact of gel layer formation on colloid retention in membrane filtration processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:486-494.
22. Kovács Z., Discacciati M., Samhaber W. Numerical simulation and optimization of multi-step batch membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:50-58.
23. Jin X., Hu J., Ong S.L. Removal of natural hormone estrone from secondary effluents using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Water Res. 2010, 44:638-648.
24. Agenson K.O., Urase T. Change in membrane performance due to organic fouling in nanofiltration (NF)/reverse osmosis (RO) applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55:147-156.
25. Bellona C., Drewes J.E. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications a pilotscale study. Water Res. 2007, 41:3948-3958.
26. Nghiem L.D., Hawkes S. Effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): mechanisms and role of membrane pore size. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 57:176-184.
27. Ellouze F., Ben Amar N., Mokhtar M.N., Zimmermann W., Deratani A. Fractionation of homologous CD6 to CD60 cyclodextrin mixture by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 374:129-137.
28. Spiegler K.S., Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes. Desalination 1966, 1:311-326.
29. Wang X.-L., Tsuru T., Nakao S.-i., Kimura S. The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 135:19-32.
30. Chaabane T., Taha S., Taleb Ahmed M., Maachi R., Dorange G. Coupled model of film theory and the Nernst-Planck equation in nanofiltration. Desalination 2007, 206:424-432.
31. Cuartas-Uribe B., Vincent-Vela M.C., Alvarez-Blanco S., Alcaina-Miranda M.I., Soriano-Costa E. Nanofiltration of sweet whey and prediction of lactose retention as a function of permeate flux using the Kedem-Spiegler and Donnan Steric Partioning models. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 56:38-46.
32. Goulas A.K., Kapasakalidis P.G., Sinclair H.R., Rastall R.A., Grandison A.S. Purification of oligosaccharides by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 209:321-335.